08:55:46 <ErCiccione> carrington: I would prefer to see somebody new moderate next meeting, but if nobody is available, i can do it.
16:13:13 <bevanoff[m]> Do y'all know what's gonna be on the agenda. I think it'd be nice to be a little more structured in the future. eg confirm with somebody from some work group that they will be giving a report before hand (there's a lot of them) or get an idea of who will be doing CCS reports/proposals before hand to save some time.
16:17:45 <bevanoff[m]> Also do we want the next meeting to be dedicated to MRL/dev funding discussion? If so I would give a vote to Keiji as chair and i think another co-host could be nice
16:42:56 <carrington[m]> I think MRL funding should be it's own dedicated meeting really
16:43:03 <carrington[m]> It's a big issue
17:13:05 <carrington[m]> <bevanoff[m] "Do y'all know what's gonna be on"> This would definitely be a lot of work, it may be better to just publicize more frequently and widely
22:31:43 <mcfranko[m]> I was thinking (and I was wondering if anyone had any thoughts about this) that because RandomX mining is much cheaper, electricity wise, the block reward could be reduced to a lot less, and still maintain the same security as bitcoin for example? Security here would be defined as how much it costs to buy the equipment necessary to 51 attack the network. I'm not suggesting the block reward to be reduced (It's farrrrr too late to
22:31:43 <mcfranko[m]> change emission schedule), I'm just curious about this for application to other projects.
22:31:43 <mcfranko[m]> 5000$ worth of monero mining equipment uses farrr less energy than 5000$ worth of bitcoin mining equipment (ASIC would use like 3000 watts, PC with good cpu would use maybe 800 max). My point being, the ongoing cost is much less, so you don't need to reward miners nearly as much to get the same amount of hardware backing it