00:48:07 <BusyBoredom[m]> On the security of 0-conf: are double spends detected by the daemon before the daemon includes them in the txpool? So if I request "/get_transaction_pool" from my daemon over http, I can be reasonably confident that the results don't contain double spends? 
00:59:14 <nikg83[m]> <BusyBoredom[m]> "On the security of 0-conf: are..." <- Afaik, yes deamon will reject double spend
01:27:47 <pigeons> but you don't know that someone won't mine a double spend before the one you see in the transaction pool
12:10:23 <BusyBoredom[m]> Awesome, that's what I was hoping. I briefly looked through cryptonote_core to double check and it looks like you're right, transactions are checked for double spends before being added to the daemon pool :) 
12:10:23 <BusyBoredom[m]> pigeons, that's OK, I just wanted to know that a trustworthy daemon won't knowingly include double spends in /get_transaction_pool results. 
12:10:47 <BusyBoredom[m]> before being added to the daemon's tx pool* 
17:10:57 <crypto_grampy[m]> https://travala-dashboard.com/
17:11:53 <crypto_grampy[m]> This has detailed crypto usage stats- how many tx's per coin in case anyone is interested. 
17:27:39 <crypto_grampy[m]> * usage stats for travala- how