03:14:18 <Orpheus[m]> > <@carrington:monero.social> Yes
03:14:18 <Orpheus[m]> >  https://matrix.to/#/#monerospace:monero.social
03:14:18 <Orpheus[m]> thank you
14:45:09 <freestatemag[m]> any update on the monero decentralized exchange that was in the works?
14:45:41 <Rucknium[m]> freestatemag: ask in #haveno:haveno.network 
15:25:50 <atomfried[m]> what specs should a notebook have in order to run a p2pool + monerod node to serve other miners?
15:26:14 <atomfried[m]> i have an old pc with a core2duo and 4gb RAM would this be enought or is it to slow?
15:27:33 <sech1> should be enough if you run p2pool with "--light-mode" parameter
15:39:53 <atomfried[m]> oh it does not need a monerod instance?
15:42:50 <sech1> it needs monerod instance, but it can run on another machine
15:43:21 <sech1> p2pool+monerod can fit in 4 GB together even on the same machine
15:44:56 <atomfried[m]> ah ok nice and a cpu such as a core2duo is enought for block verfication?
15:45:27 <sech1> yes, if you run 64-bit OS
15:45:36 <sech1> but it will be slow because no hardware AES
15:48:06 <atomfried[m]> i only want to use this machine to serve some other machines which will be mining 
15:48:25 <atomfried[m]> do you think that will be enought?
15:50:41 <sech1> yes
15:50:57 <sech1> People run monerod+p2pool even on Raspberry Pi
16:04:18 <xmrscott[m]> -space meeting in 1 hour: https://github.com/monero-project/meta/issues/628
17:32:15 <Monero101> X-P
17:57:12 <carrington[m]> Monero-events meeting in minutes
17:57:13 <carrington[m]> https://github.com/monero-project/meta/issues/629
17:57:22 <carrington[m]> 3 minutes*
18:10:43 <sgp_> Fluorine Fermi won the condorcet 0.18 naming poll https://forum.monero.space/d/151-what-to-name-the-next-monero-release-018/11
18:11:38 <msvb-lab> Great news, thanks for managing the naming poll sgp.
18:46:15 <crypto_grampy[m]> selsta: What are your thoughts on bevanoff and I going through the Monero GUI issue list and adding labels to everything where appropriate? 
21:40:52 <selsta> crypto_grampy[m]: if you can make a list, sure
22:33:58 <crypto_grampy[m]> <selsta> "crypto_grampy: if you can make a..." <- How would you want this list structured?  spreadsheet with issue number and labels in a separate column or something?  Would it be easier if a comment was left on each issue?
22:38:12 <selsta> spreadsheet would be best, you can also create new labels
22:38:19 <selsta> if they don't exist yet
22:59:11 <crypto_grampy[m]> any in particular that you've been wanting to add?