03:46:12 chesterfield: A general comparison like what LM knowledge base did would be fantastic 03:47:06 Kivojo[m]: http://localmonero.co/nojs/knowledge/why-monero-is-better 03:48:01 Even firo boys have this comparison and they constantly update it 03:49:07 Kivojo[m]: not to mention they were the main propagandists of "MOONEGRO is nOt aUdiTaBle" 03:51:04 s/MOONEGRO/moONegRo/ 03:52:06 Firo has a bright future if they stop being toxic 03:58:34 * Even firo boys have this comparison and they constantly update it 03:58:34 https://web.archive.org/web/20210127203406/https://firo.org/guide/privacy-technology-comparison.html 03:58:41 * Even firo boys have this comparison and they constantly update it 03:58:41 https://firo.org/guide/privacy-technology-comparison.html 03:59:25 Anyone here knows how to contact orangefren.com? 04:00:10 I know it have a reddit account assigned to it, but something like XMPP or Matrix is nice. 04:01:06 s/have/has/ 04:01:19 * I know it has a reddit account assigned to it, but something like XMPP or Matrix would be nice. 04:05:00 Considering ring signatures only use previous addresses on the blockchain as dummies, isn't it trivial to determine which address a transaction was sent from if the sending address has never been used before? 04:05:06 If not, what do I misunderstand? 04:05:28 s/isn't/can/, s/it/you/, s/trivial to// 04:06:46 lberrymage[m]: Decoy selection algorithm in Monero is a tricky one, and in the past it has been exploited to deanonymize people. 04:07:30 * deanonymize people (they've been patched). 04:13:08 Does the issue I mentioned exist though? 04:26:53 "Does the issue I mentioned exist..." <- I don't know. I didn't understand that algorithm ever. 04:54:11 https://stockhead.com.au/cryptocurrency/a-20-spike-in-90-minutes-privacy-coins-monero-zcash-surge-ahead-of-bidens-crypto-order/ 04:54:24 nakhy[m]: What caused this? 05:06:16 It says at the top of the article: 05:06:16 > possibly prompted by news reports that Joe Biden will shortly sign an executive order regulating cryptocurrency 08:29:55 Seth For Privacy: how often does your docker node reset? It works perfectly fine but throws out my peer and rate limits 08:29:59 After a few days 08:32:08 Wouldn't be a problem with fiber but 500kb/s up causes real problems on my slow ass internet 😅 13:49:06 "Seth For Privacy: how often does..." <- Weekly for image updates, but you can choose to not run the Watchtower container alongside it and only manually upgrade when desired. 13:49:27 If you do that then it won't restart at all (unless it hits an error or something and monerod crashes, but I've never seen that happen in years of running a node). 13:58:33 Limit_up 100 13:58:34 ? 13:58:42 in_peers 50 13:59:45 Within 14:01:02 I don't touch it, followed Seth's tutorial 14:03:01 Just normal docker run i believe 14:05:35 So i stop the container and restart it with that? 14:10:38 Ok thx, for the flag, do i need to watch out for anything? 14:10:49 --limit-rate-up 100 14:10:56 Would that work or is the space wrong? 14:11:44 Got it, thanks for the help :) 14:13:31 chesterfield: This won't mess with the Blockchain data itself, right? 14:14:42 Ok nice 14:17:20 Went well, stuff is applied and running 14:19:31 Neat, loads of progress today, got the node fixed and vnstat configured so I can log how much data it's sending:) 15:00:44 something must be wrong with the bridge, all I see is monerobull[m] talking to himself 15:04:34 Or you have the other person in your ignore list 15:04:40 It looks fine from my side 15:04:55 Oh, wait, you're on Libera right? 15:07:50 yes on IRC 15:08:08 I have no ignore list :) 15:09:06 do people on IRC see the emoji reactions to comments? 👀 15:09:36 I do 15:10:02 probably depends on the system used 15:10:18 not sure 15:11:11 thanks , just checking 17:00:18 -xmr-pr- [meta] Rucknium opened issue #672: Monero Research Lab Meeting - Wed 09 March 2022 @ 17:00 UTC 17:00:18 -xmr-pr- > https://github.com/monero-project/meta/issues/672 22:48:04 "escapethe3ra: not sure if it was..." <- if you're referring to the mobile version, they yes it was intentional 22:48:10 s/they/then/