11:05:15 <NorrinRadd> sgp[m]  would you be able to help out in the dev channel? someone is reporting an issue but needs some questions answered and i don't dev on monero 
15:34:55 <dEBRUYNE> fr33_yourself[m]: You can simply move the chain to another drive after the initial sync: https://monero.stackexchange.com/questions/7225/how-do-i-move-the-blockchain-data-mdb-to-a-different-directory-during-or-afte
15:40:30 <binaryFate> Looking for a copywriter familiar with Monero, what's the best way to post job offer or find someone these days?
16:04:34 <plowsof> off the top of my head, the only person i know who is familiar with copyright 'advice' is apotheon of copyfree.org .  sgphave any recommendations? 
16:09:35 <binaryFate> plowsof: I mean https://www.indeed.com/hire/job-description/copywriter
16:10:02 <binaryFate> I don't know where the term comes from, I find it misleading :)
16:15:07 <dEBRUYNE> r/Monero maybe?
16:15:08 <dEBRUYNE> ^ binaryFate 
16:20:30 <apotheon[m]> <binaryFate> "Looking for a copywriter..." <- It's possible I'd take a job like that.
16:21:02 <apotheon[m]> I won't take the kind of workload I had the last time I wrote English for a living, though.  Fourteen articles a month was excessive.
16:24:01 <plowsof> well there's the first application 😁 as for spreading the word, a post on r/Monero is enough and we can handle the rest 
16:28:45 <apotheon[m]> binaryFate: Let me know what kind of requirements you have, if you're interested in me as a candidate.  I was lead/"host" security writer for TechRepublic for several years, and also wrote articles for two other topic areas (open source software and software development) for TR at the same time.  I also co-wrote a TTRPG supplement for publisher Raging Swan, where basically every review was positive and reviewers quoted sections I
16:28:45 <apotheon[m]> wrote as examples of what they liked.
22:33:38 <DiegoSalazar[m]> https://github.com/monero-project/monero-site/pull/2081
22:39:16 <plowsof> so it's 'production ready'? or are there going to be many updates in quick succession in the next coming weeks with still some things to be ironed out? 
22:41:32 <DiegoSalazar[m]> Probably one more update with several bug fixes.
22:41:42 <DiegoSalazar[m]> in between now and exiting beta
22:41:44 <DiegoSalazar[m]> not ever :P
22:43:33 <ofrnxmr[m]> Diego Salazar: I think a bit premature
22:44:15 <DiegoSalazar[m]> Elaborate?
22:44:37 <DiegoSalazar[m]> If you've got compelling arguments, I will withdraw the PR.
22:46:14 <ofrnxmr[m]> Not quite ready for wide release yet, couple bugs
22:47:06 <plowsof> i support adding stack to getmonero ofcourse, the reason i ask is to maybe avoid 'egg on your face' if something is broken and you're inundated with reports . but then again, which wallet on the list doesn't have bugs already ^^ 
22:48:19 <ofrnxmr[m]> The last thing a new wallet needs is a bad rap off the jump
22:48:19 <DiegoSalazar[m]> Fair points. I'll add Do not merge! then
22:49:22 <DiegoSalazar[m]> but the PR is there and the "work" is done for addition, so when it's ready, it can be merged.
22:49:22 <plowsof> it will be added , no question there, its your call 'when' 
22:49:23 <DiegoSalazar[m]> Thanks for being real.
22:49:44 <ofrnxmr[m]> There's always a question
22:49:44 <ofrnxmr[m]> Monero.com was blocked in part due to the fiat api. Is stalled for the same reason 
22:50:31 <DiegoSalazar[m]> https://github.com/monero-project/monero-site/pull/2007
22:50:32 <DiegoSalazar[m]> reading now
22:51:07 <plowsof> how could i forget the monero.com wallet wars 
22:51:31 <DiegoSalazar[m]> I was actually going to ask if while I'm at it, I should add monero.com cuz I noticed they were absent. :P
22:54:32 <DiegoSalazar[m]> lol ofrnxmr https://github.com/cake-tech/cake_wallet/issues/280
22:54:52 <ofrnxmr[m]> That is moi
22:55:00 <DiegoSalazar[m]> ye, I figured.
22:55:43 <ofrnxmr[m]> Monero wallets themselves were making external calls pre v18 as well 🫶
22:56:00 <DiegoSalazar[m]> fwiw, I do think monero.com should be added
22:56:56 <ofrnxmr[m]> I do as well. I see no issue with adding it - only had an issue with the politics surrounding the data collection on an app that may be mistaken for an officially endorsed app due to the name
22:57:55 <DiegoSalazar[m]> ofrnxmr: in regards to deleting default Stack nodes, would you find it acceptable if in the Advanced Settings, there's a "Restore Default Stack Nodes" button? Reason being if a noob accidentally deletes a Stack node, they won't know how to add one of their own and they won't be able to use their wallets anymore.
22:58:09 <ofrnxmr[m]> Of course 
22:58:19 <DiegoSalazar[m]> Or perhaps only allow deletion of a Stack node if/when another node has been added to ensure proper function.
22:58:40 <DiegoSalazar[m]> If Stack Node is only node, don't allow delete. If another node exists, allow deletion.
22:59:14 <ofrnxmr[m]> I was going to say that earlier :P (always require minimum 1 node. Any node can be deleted unless it is the last/only one)
22:59:16 <ofrnxmr[m]> Sounds good