02:53:41 <TrasherDK[m]> <nioc> "can I get paid for quitting my..." <- I had a good hard laugh, back when I read that CCS proposal.
02:53:41 <TrasherDK[m]> Like, I didn't get elected, and my other side-hustles hasn't generated as much as I hoped for, so please guys, gimme your neros 😂
03:05:43 <DanIsnotthemanBr> Gotta take the good with the bad.
03:06:04 <DanIsnotthemanBr> Gets funded what can you do
03:07:34 <TrasherDK[m]> Did it get funded? Holy shit 🤣
03:10:36 <DanIsnotthemanBr> Dougs one?
03:49:53 <TrasherDK[m]> Yep, that one.
05:20:28 <DanIsnotthemanBr> Yeah funded year ago
05:22:57 <TrasherDK[m]> The linked CCS displayed no funding info and zero milestones.
05:46:05 <DanIsnotthemanBr> Its in funded just no milestone submitted.
05:46:18 <DanIsnotthemanBr> So 💰💰
05:46:28 <DanIsnotthemanBr> * So no 💰💰
06:52:14 <plowsof11> "milestones of what we intend on achieving in 6 months" but the actual payout criteria is listed as simply being the passing of time - ms1 = months 1+2 and so on
07:12:41 <DanIsnotthemanBr> I get that but been 6months so you would think he could claim all.
07:18:18 <TrasherDK[m]> Shouldn't some kind of metric be used to indicate success or failure?
07:23:46 <DanIsnotthemanBr> I think someone asked that
07:27:24 <nikg83[m]> He hasn’t left his job or followed up with the ccs if my info is correct
07:33:07 <plowsof11> Correct nik83 , ive not reached out to him about it but have seen him mention "ill have to get around to that ccs sometime" 
07:34:13 <DanIsnotthemanBr> Lol
07:34:14 <DanIsnotthemanBr> Island time
07:34:58 <DanIsnotthemanBr> I get there when i get there
07:36:14 <plowsof11> Original comments here https://repo.getmonero.org/monero-project/ccs-proposals/-/merge_requests/250
07:40:45 <DanIsnotthemanBr> A bit hard to quantify if milestones are meet after each month. Might have to disregard month by month and look at the final outcome. Ie youtube subs.
08:05:39 <TrasherDK[m]> Cool, so the more bucks he make on the tube, the more qualified he is to get a payout from this CCS, right?
08:17:45 <DanIsnotthemanBr> I use piped sucker muahahah
08:20:28 <TrasherDK[m]> I'm assuming a "pied piper" reference : `one that offers strong but delusive enticement.`
09:19:10 <ofrnxmr[m]> <DanIsnotthemanBr> "A bit hard to quantify if..." <- No
09:19:40 <ofrnxmr[m]> doug is more than entitled to claim the entire amount
09:20:29 <ofrnxmr[m]> Theres used to be a lot of ccs that were merged by fanboy-ism and not professionalism. Thats monero's fault, not dougs
09:22:42 <ofrnxmr[m]> Even the movie ccs from geo - he got 24k to submit the movie
09:30:03 <ofrnxmr[m]> as far as im concerned, if we merged a ccs for "do whatever it is you want for 6 months"
09:30:18 <ofrnxmr[m]> You cant have buyers remorse.
09:30:58 <ofrnxmr[m]> Next time people should read ccs' before yolo merging em
09:32:09 <DanIsnotthemanBr> Not saying it shouldn’t be claimed, just saying maybe they should of put more  thought in quantifying progress in that scenario.
09:32:27 <DanIsnotthemanBr> Probably should of used growth percentage
09:32:37 <DanIsnotthemanBr> Not final humber
09:35:23 <ofrnxmr[m]> DanIsnotthemanBr: ^ communities job
09:35:49 <ofrnxmr[m]> Doug could write a blank ccs - if nobody reads it.. fair game
09:37:25 <DanIsnotthemanBr> Claim it!!!!!!!!!¡
09:38:01 <DanIsnotthemanBr> Makes it look good on revenue statement.
09:42:22 <ceetee[m]> you can have buys remorse, but no returns accepted
09:42:30 <ceetee[m]> learn for the next time
09:49:27 <DanIsnotthemanBr> No refunds, no take backs
16:34:52 <veggiemaven[m]> The Buy Ticket link seems to be dead
16:37:18 <veggiemaven[m]> Wrong chat