04:14:02 How is m​idipoet: `The most the community loses is the XMR amount associated with that milestone.` even in the conversation? 04:14:02 Sponsors funds should never be put at risk. 06:50:22 Because a seed was created with barely any entropy, and sent half via superPrivateChat.apk , the rest via carrier pigeon. Then an evil maid ignored a windows machine with other crypto wallet(s). This is why community funds should be put at risk 07:00:24 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> E2ee carrier pigeon ? 07:59:44 trasherdk: sponsors funds are evidently at risk with DF or escrow, as we have have seen. 08:11:51 Remember to volunteer to organise our assembly at the forthcoming CCC Congress in case a Monero presence is welcome there. 08:11:53 For participation at the Cryptocurrency Hackers assembly contact me here or on events. 11:04:21 m​idipoet: The loss of funds had nothing to do with the CCS system. It was solely caused by one persons negligence aka. Total fuck-up. 11:12:18 trasherdk: so what you're saying is that a single party escrow system poses no risk? 12:01:59 But GF is 👌? 12:08:47 "we musnt risk rhe $5 12:09:18 " 12:09:18 "sir, what about the 5m?" 12:09:19 "what about it?" 12:09:19 "... nvm" 12:10:05 > m​idipoet: The loss of funds had nothing to do with the CCS system. It was solely caused by one persons negligence aka. Total fuck-up. 12:10:05 Agreed 12:11:16 I'm saying that the existing CCS system have a long record of success. 12:11:16 The direct funding system has zero, as shown by proponents of DF wanting exposure through the CCS. 12:12:21 Why u gotta tell the truth, trasher? 12:12:21 people prefer their comfort zones 12:12:59 escrow = what your employer does 12:13:09 Bursting bubbles is my favorite pastime. 12:13:14 But, does your employer disappear on payday? 12:14:04 im going to go ask my boss at work for DF 12:14:44 Aint that called "being a stripper" 12:15:02 Good luck with that. They are going to laugh their asses of while kicking you out the door. 12:15:12 My ass is phat 12:15:42 Theyll be throwing dollars to see the door hit it omw out! 12:15:55 DF = best funding 12:15:55 (im jkn) 12:18:25 https://matrix.monero.social/_matrix/media/v1/download/monero.social/GOPcvSHfkqrsQVKCbttIfIoq 12:20:16 This is what the 68 Mustang I'm restoring. You can buy it now, paying 1000 XMR. It'll be ready for pickup in about 2 months. 12:20:16 How does that sound? 12:20:55 This is what the 68 Mustang I'm restoring is going to look like 💯 12:29:51 pinky promise you wont run off? 12:38:52 Suuure 💯 12:43:40 GF also poses a risk to sponsors/donors funds, as it is also (as I understand it) a single party escrow system 12:44:14 we haven't really learned anything new with this exchange, apart from trasher liking Fords 12:47:54 It was an example of reputational direct funding. Something the OG devs with the longstanding reputation doesn't want. 12:52:41 Midipoet is a slow learner 12:52:49 "we" hehe 12:53:27 DF is for larping or for those who dont need ccs 12:54:10 And larp is an acronym for live action role play.. its not an insult, its an observation 13:02:48 Hello everyone, what’s the process for introducing and approving changes to Monero? I apologise for the newbie question, maybe there’s some documentation I missed 13:11:21 Changes can be submitted via a pull request on github (or a patch pasted/shared on IRC). It's then reviewed/approved by the relevant devs 13:14:13 Eventually merged into a release branch 13:22:23 Thank you! 13:22:23 So in a practical sense the reviewers are encumbered with deciding whether or not some changes are accepted? If so, how are those devs selected? 13:24:07 I am still working on a physical, dedicated Monero wallet with a touchscreen 13:25:09 airgapped device, 800x480 matte IPS display 13:25:12 5" 13:25:30 its gona b kewl 13:26:24 megamind1337: Do you want to suggest some specific changes, or are you just curious about the process? The process is different for different kinds of changes. 13:26:35 Users decide what software they are going to run. So users decide. 13:30:23 No suggestions, just learning how it works, is this the wrong channel? 13:30:27 Community devs and community reviewers review your suggestions or PRs 13:31:28 This is the right channel. It's a question with a complicated answer 13:31:40 Monero has no BIP-like process. 13:32:21 A consensus-level change has much more discussion, review, and scrutiny than s simple wallet bug fix, for example. 13:32:57 Some big changes start here: https://github.com/monero-project/research-lab/issues 13:36:45 Sorry to change the subject 13:36:53 https://nitter.net/watchfund/status/1732391070216908886 13:37:03 But ive decided not to buy my jet yet 13:37:21 I understand, there’s always a balance in these things that has no strictly right or wrong answers; i appreciate the answers though! 14:22:49 binaryFate check general fund for a donation? 14:23:24 Plowsof, you brought your parachute? 14:25:38 Lol 14:26:09 Ofrnxmr the only one paying attention around here 14:31:05 did we get our ccs money back? 14:31:49 <0​xfffc:matrix.org> Lol 14:32:10 "paying" attention 14:32:10 (did you catch the pun?? Did ya?) 14:32:25 <0​xfffc:matrix.org> Can we verify this? 14:32:46 PlowsofAI is in verification mode 14:32:50 But hes running on an hdd 14:32:59 Might take little while 14:33:24 I have GF synced, +2696.72 XMR (might be change) 14:33:41 ( polar9669: posted first. Also paying attn) 14:33:50 GF1 gets swept to GF2, it can't be change 14:34:03 Luigi1111 14:36:07 SGP could see if there are any plausible paths back to the CCS theft txs. (no, I'm not jealous 🥲 ) 14:36:31 I just don't have my Monero data set up to quickly analyze the paths. 14:37:36 We can finally buy monero dot com!!! /S 14:39:13 that tx has the oldest of 16 ring members created on October 25th. Either it was churned, or it's not directly from the CCS hack 14:41:54 It only has a single input, too. 14:42:38 Single input is typical after you do sweep_all 14:43:29 Sweep, churn, churn, regret, donate 14:44:09 regret is a powerful mistress 14:59:45 sech1: Did you read SGP's https://moonstoneresearch.com/2023/11/03/Postmortem-of-Monero-CCS-Hack.html ? 15:01:25 The theft occurred in multiple txs because the CCS wallet had so many unspent outputs. Then the thief may have sent a PocketChange tx to themself. 15:03:08 The single-input donation tx doesn't mean it was or wasn't related to the theft. Just interesting that a single output would have so much XMR. 15:05:53 What's the txid? 15:06:01 never mind, sorry still waking up 15:13:02 Until they are confirmed swept to GF2 , those moneros don't exist 15:15:09 It was a social experiment to test loyalty to Core 15:18:00 Cheeky wink on the tweet and everything 15:30:08 The tweets arent a bot? 15:31:12 A few others have the wink too 15:31:23 And a tiny donation has 🐋🚨 15:33:37 If amount contains 69 OR 420 add wink 15:34:00 If amount < 1 cent trigger whale alert 15:35:59 WTF 15:36:06 Who, how 15:37:02 ah 15:37:10 nvm 15:45:32 Wat 15:46:18 dis 15:46:19 image.png 15:46:52 luigi1111 sum1 donated about 2.6k xmr to GF1 15:47:35 Pick the red phone up and call bF so it can be swept to GF2 rhanks 15:48:12 Wind it up first (not even connected to the grid. So secure is it) 15:48:35 I just did 15:49:23 Wow 15:49:49 see? 15:50:06 Thanks 15:50:39 bF tells.the pilot to land at the nearest flat piece of land 15:51:39 Not a mark on her 15:51:52 even filled it up with gas 15:56:42 X'D 15:57:24 <0​xfffc:matrix.org> Maybe not correct time, but I still think we should make this whole GF wallets more secure. 15:57:54 Nah we need to delay the entire monero project and work on the ccs wallet first 16:00:32 Multisig out of experimental state with UX improvements in 3 months , lets go 16:01:38 It is a proposal please don't knock it I have a very fragile ego 16:09:03 Just long enough to force urgency. I like your proposal +1 16:10:00 My ego is now even more fragile that ive made someone mention their own fragile ego. Please forgive me 16:10:18 > Nah we need to delay the entire monero project and work on the ccs wallet first 16:10:18 💯 lmao 16:11:28 "Plowsof with an ego" Hopefully one day 🤞 16:13:07 Goals for 2024! 16:17:17 just start every sentence with "listen bro, [...]" 16:19:20 For 2023* lfg 16:20:03 Im jk. I read something plowsof wrote last week 16:20:07 And i was like "atta boy" 16:22:36 (in my head) 16:22:36 and somebody else replied "its not like you to be so direct" or similar. 16:22:36 Plowsof's ego is growing up 🔥 16:23:08 ofrnxmr better tread lightly in 2024 16:24:42 If im not tired then I don't have to go to bed i said (stamped my foot after it) 17:53:01 I moved the fat donation to GF2 17:53:47 It's real woohoo thank you 17:55:49 So it's real? We have the same amount as before, basically? 17:55:56 More 17:56:21 Oh man. 17:57:15 2,675.73 stolen and 17:57:22 Somehow hard to believe. Maybe just a glitch in the universe simulation :) 17:57:58 where was nioc's cat today 17:58:25 selsta: I might have to check her wallet 17:58:41 21 extra rbrunner, if the whale would like a refund please email bF xD 18:13:30 <0​xfffc:matrix.org> https://youtu.be/gHFuXe-glRY 18:13:30 <0​xfffc:matrix.org> Welcome to the real world! 18:24:44 (this was all a ploy by core to speedup multisig) 18:47:09 0xFFFC: found my autobiography 18:49:30 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Lol hacker shit themselves? 18:52:04 https://youtu.be/Nbb1OQohuMQ 18:52:38 Skip to :35 18:54:09 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Everyone back to insecure setups plz. It was over hyped. 18:54:41 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> #ban youtube links# 18:54:53 It's that brax video about the HTTPS scam 18:55:11 https://yewtu.be/watch?v=Nbb1OQohuMQ 18:55:40 oh lol 18:56:21 I just watched a Brax video and apparently the EU is going to force a "EU" root certificate in everyone throat. 18:57:20 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> I need to pee pee brb 18:57:42 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> I know france is doing something with browsers 19:00:20 Eu will force a root certificate and will make it illegal for browser to blacklist it 19:00:20 To make it simple, they are crying because all traffic is https and they want to see it all 19:00:33 https://therecord.media/eu-urged-to-drop-law-website-authentication-certificates 19:01:57 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Lol 19:02:02 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Stiff shit 19:02:04 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Problem is it will be in all countries 19:02:14 yep 19:02:15 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Lets go to an eu country to decrypt 19:16:42 21 extra rbrunner, if the whale would like a refund please email bF xD <= referencing 21m something or other surely 19:17:10 No 19:17:30 Referencing the amount of days plowsof has been volunteering 19:17:53 21m is meaniingless around here 19:17:55 Ah ha 19:18:44 Im the whale tho 82X4L9o1DjGXuB6eGCAuW2UvG2pusRwZ754QLMqoYk1rhRBP1VUKGWtPsjhFV8ragbHG4SSe7H9srJgxzxBkoKhu8Zcw3aw 19:18:49 Please refund the surplus. Thx 19:19:04 Im also satoshi unless anybody wants to prove otherwise 19:20:24 And yes, i shredded the wallet already. As you can imagine, i didnt want any proof to exist that i had the stolen money 19:21:21 21 is cleary 777, as much luck as you can get 19:24:13 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Chmod 777 19:26:01 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Hacker can send email to hardware⊙go😉 19:29:33 Real hacker can send email _from_ hardware⊙go 19:30:24 :D 19:31:18 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> And the connecting email client is a m$ machine 😳 19:31:49 where were the ~2600 XMR sent? to the same wallet that was drained? 19:32:07 The General Monero Fund 19:32:38 The garage door is closed like ofrn said so they got to park it somewhere else 😂 19:36:36 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Probably a pegasus link in tx_extra 19:36:37 And it is confirmed to not be change? 19:38:07 yes, it wasn't a change 19:38:16 bF already moved it 19:38:53 But anon and no information on source? 19:40:13 No one claimed it yet 19:41:00 cool beans 19:41:39 I claimed but nobody believes me 19:42:52 then you can just share the tx private key to prove it 19:43:24 then everyone can check it in "Prove sending" tab in https://www.p2pool.io/explorer/tx/d6f518d8131472aac362f1f22a99da46fc93aed53af8c83baf637f62193c4f11 19:47:33 Note don't do that unless you have a timestamp 19:48:40 Did someone discuss the Moonstone "tracking" results from the fund drain? 19:49:11 It looked like they could make some initial educated guesses due to Monerujo Pocketchange, but not much after that - is that the gist of it? 19:52:23 maybe pocketchange 19:53:23 Sure, maybe pocketchange. 19:53:30 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Guessitmate 19:54:04 > then you can just share the tx private key to prove it 19:54:05 I just said i shredded that 19:54:11 > And yes, i shredded the wallet already. As you can imagine, i didnt want any proof to exist that i had the stolen money 19:54:12 ^ 19:54:41 Trust me 19:54:41 tm 19:55:46 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Recover from snapshot 20:48:38 <0​xfffc:matrix.org> Evidence: trust me bro 21:40:32 hey is this the real monero merch? https://moneromerch.com/ and if it is why isnt it on getmonero.org 21:49:37 The real monero merch as in? 21:53:22 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Will the real monero please stand up 21:54:12 Seems to be the correct URL. 2 months ago i notified them that the ccs wallet has public private viewkeys of they ever want to prove their % donations https://www.reddit.com/r/Monero/comments/1792r91/comment/k55klqd/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3 21:54:39 To the old / haxd wallet (rip) 22:29:06 Hi guys, does anyone know more about the DAO discussion for monero? i remember reading about it a while back....any new update? 22:32:43 Dao? 22:32:54 Maybe 0xmonero 22:33:38 Whats next, we unionize? 22:34:38 (thats my "what is the state of DAO's in Monero, as per ofrnxmr") 22:35:52 Hopefully that answers your question. I also hope others agree (were not looking into forming a dao) 22:39:03 yes a DAO, i will see if i find it...and its not really a bad thing to be honest for ensuring devs are funded 22:39:49 🚮 22:40:32 if dev want money, dev come say "i want money" dev work, dev get paid 22:40:45 what do i need an NFT for 22:40:57 (a gimmick) 22:41:41 Need multisig, not politicians 22:41:43 ahh maybe it was connected to the thread by fluffy :D 22:42:05 https://github.com/monero-project/meta/issues/921 22:44:49 What is then the consensus around "disbanding" monero Core as the post talks about? 22:52:30 That was a bit rushed by fp imo. I think the sentiment of core being more irrelevant is good, but it's not completely realistic to decentralize certain things 22:53:30 Although that's partially orthogonal I guess to the workgroup question. 23:17:13 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Funds were returned…maybe…not sure. Return to your normal viewing pleasure