04:45:24 sooo CCS is soon™ back? 05:23:16 For christmassss 08:15:59 Update on MoneroKon: crowdfunding campaign to form a nonprofit ends on New Years: https://funding.monerokon.com 08:16:34 We've raised enough to pay for immediate expenses.. big thank you to all donors! 08:16:56 any unraised amount by the deadline will be rolled into general operation costs of MoneroKon 2024 09:43:17 It would let us see if n1oc hasn't given up on checking the funding required page 09:54:36 I asked the outreach/social media department for a catchy title and after some brainstorming they offered "Do they know it's CCS'mas time again?" 10:19:40 <4​rkal:monero.social> https://4rkal.eu.org/posts/coldstorage/ 10:20:00 <4​rkal:monero.social> https://4rkal.eu.org/posts/feathernero/ 10:20:15 <4​rkal:monero.social> Feather X Anonero 10:20:46 <4​rkal:monero.social> Complete guide on how to use featherwallet with anonero for cold storage. Using only animated QR codes! 10:31:35 Nice 4rkal, Thanks! The joys when projects decide on a UR standard for transferring monero tx data. A useful guide .. one day the MoneroSeedSigner will be compatible 10:54:07 <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Soon™️ 16:14:00 would 0.001 xmr be enough to subsidise 3 months of ccs tx fees? 16:19:55 I dont think so. Consolidations if the donations probably cost more 16:20:00 Of* 16:23:52 Maybe .004 is ~300 donations and 27 payouts 16:23:54 If 16:24:05 i was thinking about flexing on BTC with a test milestone for x transactions 16:24:17 as milestone 1 for this test ccs proposal... or 16:25:28 .004 is only 71c for 27 transactions 16:31:15 suspiciously close to 69 cents 16:44:59 open for suggestions / corrections https://repo.getmonero.org/monero-project/ccs-proposals/-/merge_requests/427 16:45:16 e.g. maybe the details of the new wallet setup are incorrect luigi1111 16:51:10 CCS fundraiser for 0.004 xmr :D 16:52:53 Yeah 0.004 too low prob 16:53:32 when are proposals being moved to funding required? 16:53:32 Make it 0.069 16:53:42 Waiting on confirmation of backend change 16:53:49 thx 16:54:15 sounds perfect , will do . "feed the devs" sound track for this proposal https://yewtu.be/watch?v=j3fSknbR7Y4 16:57:52 amounts fixed luigi1111 16:59:24 details pending review 18:24:27 bridge is restarting in a few minutes to add Townforge channels 18:49:04 Hi, i have lost all my saved money to FTX jews around 20000 dollars. 18:49:05 Please help me live. Please help me. 18:49:05 BTC :   bc1q9vfmfwj6av9pxj50r6xyl652mwhqvw5ds86nw2 18:49:06 xmr: 44QNNugXXCWUcUGi7UGsRM4pqnKKmn4zYjcZT3BnNHWBWyXRoe4mfLwT5L67kGyTLu76c1hmPV7QKZESP9w7bQ7m8Y1VUgx 19:50:13 Cleanup in aisle everychat 19:52:09 Did FTX even list monero? .. wheres telegrambot admin when you need to mass delete stuff 19:53:05 non 19:53:58 So this person didnt even lose any xmr 19:54:08 Just 20k worth of gambling 19:54:23 (im playing devils advocate) 19:59:25 they posted it all over libera.chat, they just took most of large channels 19:59:37 including official channels 19:59:52 under different nicks 22:40:04 is using pools a bad idea? 22:42:20 Define bad :D lol 22:42:27 Large pools > definitely bad 22:45:07 ? 22:45:31 The msgs were deleted. A spammer 22:48:10 is it possible to mine without a pool? 22:48:38 Yea 22:49:04 you can 22:49:04 solo or p2pool 22:49:34 are big pools a problem? 22:49:42 Easy p2pool setup see: GUPAX 22:49:47 Yes 22:50:02 are they an immediate threat to monero? 22:50:40 69% of the top 2 pools 22:50:49 on* 22:51:28 is monero fucked? 22:51:38 no 22:51:47 why not? 22:52:29 Because were not fighting back yet 22:53:00 ? 22:53:21 Adding too much hr to any any pool (to balance it out), lowera profitability 22:53:33 So normal folks will actually stop mining and its counterproductive 22:54:06 ahh 22:57:47 I would like to see "good actor" pools split their pools up and limit their max hash 22:59:25 well the issue seems to fix itself 22:59:53 in theory 23:00:54 for redundancy :P 23:00:54 it be nice if supportxmr @ 25% "autoswitching you to our other pool, supportxmr 2" 23:00:54 At that point we'd be trusting support to actually split the pools, instead of trusting miners to not use a pool to try to 51% 23:02:25 If 30% of nanos miners move to support, support will have 50%. Support could probably limit that on their end if they wanted to 23:03:34 We need to build a better x5 23:04:14 Call it "x5 pro" 23:39:37 But if the same entity controls them, it makes no difference 23:40:30 The point is that different people control different pools 23:42:28 Large pools already have a "distributed" infrastructure - can't put all that load on a single node, plus they want multiple nodes across the world to ensure low ping for all their miners