02:17:39 Nah, just a moron. 11:08:30 communist manifesto 11:18:02 Jokeman203 #monero-offtopic 12:02:12 2 days ago, zcash received the latest discussion results from Binance Exchange. Does the token ZEC need not be delisted if it passes the review? :Update: We have received confirmation from Binance that we have successfully passed their compliance review and can proceed with implementing the new address type. Binance did not indicate a preference between the TEX Address and Traceab 12:02:12 le Unified Address options, so I’ve reached out to inquire about their position. If they do not express a preference, we will need to quickly decide which implementation approach to take. 12:02:13 I am going to schedule a meeting for early next week with Hanh, Kris, Daira, and Pacu to discuss implementation details and create a project plan. We also need to determine the most effective methods for coordinating with wallet developers, exchanges, and other relevant parties to ensure a smooth integration process. Following the meeting, I will update the community with our plan 12:02:13 ned course of action. 12:03:45 jessica_77 why are you asking us about ZEC , they have their own forum 12:13:27 <123bob123:matrix.org> https://hbr.org/2022/03/dear-manager-youre-holding-too-many-meetings 12:15:54 the perfect prelude to announcing the meeting in 2hr45 mins https://github.com/monero-project/meta/issues/956#issue-2080509163 12:22:19 for the disband core meta issue: i floated the idea of a mock/pilot general fund workgroup: collect all the recent GF donations, noting the % given and the type of proposal. then using this to put ccs proposals forward with a % taken off the total to come from the GF. e.g. developer requests 10 xmr, their proposal is approved but the general fund workgroup decide to donate 20% to 12:22:19 it, so it goes to funding at 8xmr, and then we can tell everyone how amazing/active the general fund is (because things are funded to quick and we still need people to donate to the GF). but nioCat said no :((( 12:24:05 <123bob123:matrix.org> Cat has spoken 12:24:12 <123bob123:matrix.org> This is the way 12:31:40 <123bob123:matrix.org> The fluffy’s bluff is working so far with the disbanding 12:32:02 Fk yur ideas 12:32:06 Core isnt disbanding :D 12:32:18 Cat has spoken. 12:32:35 Plowsof doing the most to appease weirdos 12:33:03 Please stop entertaining such noise 12:34:54 Core disbaning lol. Core has been "disbanded" for years. what are we really talking about. larping about making shit pudding out of a shitty situation. 12:35:16 Core will fix it, right nioCat? 12:38:55 the general fund workgroup stood out to me as we definitely dont have anything like that atm and in the last few transparency reports for the GF - nothing can be contributed to. so from an outside perspective the GF just sits there (even though it is actively being used to pay for infrastructure) all this just happens quietly 12:38:58 <123bob123:matrix.org> https://github.com/monero-project/meta/issues/232 12:38:58 <123bob123:matrix.org> Close, i am central controller now 12:40:07 most of the other stuff 'exists' but is done by trusted volunteers 12:40:18 need oversight comitte 12:40:25 Not generalfund workgroup 12:40:50 Need multisig GF, not a workgroup 12:41:09 look at events / monerkon 🤣 12:41:22 Yeah right, like i want 17 monkeys doing our finances 12:42:04 (offence pointed at 2023's accounting and wild template billing signed off, i mean, eubber stamped by many people) 12:43:11 The problem is that core is weak, not that core is broken 12:47:36 <123bob123:matrix.org> Some of the meta issues should be closed been there for 2 yrs and nothing 12:48:22 <123bob123:matrix.org> Closed = meeting kpi 12:48:43 cant just close em 12:49:08 Meta is a place for focused discussions. Not everything meta is a closeable issue 12:49:17 close 3 times in a row, if they appear again then we have to take them seriously 12:49:24 Like the matrix tasklist can continue to change in scope 12:49:52 Can close things that are resolved, not possible, or that have been answered elsewhere sincd etc 12:50:40 Like, if theres a meta issue, and an active bounty, can close the meta. If theres a meta issue, but now the project exists on its own repo or doesnt exist, close. 12:51:09 Anyway 12:51:18 The better issue right now is this one... 12:51:54 good idea, reg bounties linked to meta-issues.. i could add a meta-issue tag to the bounties site also 🤔 12:51:54 https://github.com/monero-project/monero-site/pull/2223 12:52:00 <123bob123:matrix.org> https://github.com/monero-project/meta/issues/412 12:52:00 <123bob123:matrix.org> Email- monero communications department 12:53:23 <123bob123:matrix.org> How many media request does core get from journalist ? 12:53:25 Our 2 finest mods, polluting meta and leaving dor 4yrs 12:54:09 How many yrs does it take them to unban spirobel, rotten, or update their work 12:55:00 <123bob123:matrix.org> Soon™️ 12:55:45 <123bob123:matrix.org> Or 12:55:45 <123bob123:matrix.org> https://github.com/monero-project/meta/issues/237 12:55:45 <123bob123:matrix.org> Just a dig at community 12:57:28 Wheres anonimal now? Lol @ kovri 12:58:01 ooo123 laughed for years about that 12:59:53 <123bob123:matrix.org> https://github.com/monero-project/meta/issues/164 12:59:53 <123bob123:matrix.org> Or this is linked to another merged? 13:05:08 Seriously: https://github.com/monero-project/monero-site/pull/2223 13:05:37 Idk why plowsof put "discussion" label. Binance aint special. But here - lets discuss 13:06:52 Selsta and binaryfate were given 24hrs to give an official response whether we would comply with turning xmr into btc 13:07:27 <123bob123:matrix.org> I can answer ? 13:07:37 Clearly flying high on acid if they thought they could make such a request, or that selsta and binaryfate were capable of complying 13:08:15 Now, these idiots. Binance can comply. Lets email them and give them 72hrs to officially announce whether they will be delisting monero 13:08:35 <123bob123:matrix.org> As the great elmo elon says “ Go fck yourself” 13:08:42 And when they dont comply, we can all laugh at how we DONT have a business relationship, and they can do whatever they want. 13:09:02 Otherwise, binance, you can be listed on getmonero.org for 100k/mth 13:09:10 You have 72hrs. 13:09:20 <123bob123:matrix.org> Please donate to ccs 13:09:53 They already do, but they want to manipulate the market and bend over backwards and slander our project 13:10:03 <123bob123:matrix.org> Rav found missing data on binance i said it was ccs donation blip 13:10:23 There was no response about what we will or will not do. I havent seen binance come to a meeting and answer to community 13:10:35 Yeah, missing data was a few hrs after they reenabled withdrawals 13:10:48 <123bob123:matrix.org> Send email 13:11:18 need to borrow one of msvb's emails 13:11:39 <123bob123:matrix.org> Dear doj, i mean binance ,plz attend community meeting, i’ll bring the cookies 13:11:53 Without the noise, i think delisting them from getmonero should have been our official response 13:12:01 Selsta and bf coukd have just said "idk, ask community" 13:12:06 Then sent link to the or 13:12:08 Pr 13:12:35 <123bob123:matrix.org> First shot fired 13:13:58 <123bob123:matrix.org> And no cookies for you 14:09:41 What’s the proposed reason for disbanding? 14:11:13 https://github.com/monero-project/meta/issues/921 14:40:23 Anybody tried BTC-XMR Atomic Swaps on Samourai? 15:00:04 Meeting time https://github.com/monero-project/meta/issues/956 15:00:31 Feels like its been almost 2 weeks. Hi 15:00:46 greetings, what has been happening? News: [Monero Observer](https://www.monero.observer/) - [Revuo Monero](https://revuo-xmr.com/) - [The Monero Standard](https://localmonero.co/the-monero-standard) - [Monero Moon](https://www.themoneromoon.com/) 15:01:01 Revuo >> getmonero.org pr 15:01:56 Hi 15:02:20 the BCH<>XMR atomic swaps flipstarter was funded https://atomic-flip.pat.mn/en , further progress can be followed here https://gist.github.com/mainnet-pat/267fe6f0111ce2198559b3e19040ba26 . Rucknium is offering a reward for anyone to verify the implementation . as shown in the last comment on the related bounty https://bounties.monero.social/posts/37/18-921m-bch-xmr-atomic-swaps 15:02:46 Some further discussion on the matter in #monero-community-dev 15:02:52 i was asked if any atomic swap implementation has been "verified" (e.g. the steps kayabanerve detailed to verify the XMR<>BCH swaps in #community-dev). would this be of interest to raise funds for if it turns out to be needed? 🤷 15:02:58 <0xfffc:matrix.org> Hi everyone. 15:04:18 My intention was for kayaba to "verify" at the same level of thoroughness that he verified the ETH<>XMR atomic swap. 15:04:34 basicswapdex doesnt support bch. I think id ask them to verify it 15:04:44 Hello. 15:04:45 They use htlc and adaptor sigs too 15:05:02 He said the cryptography passed the sniff test. I may just accept that if there is no one else capable and interested in verifying that part. The BCH script contract has already been verified. 15:05:04 "Anybody tried BTC-XMR Atomic Swaps on Samourai?" -> yes, COMIT swaps in the palm of your hand... gingeropolous commented on reddit something to the effect of needing enough people to sell their monero for dirty btc. and, if anyone in #unstoppableswap:matrix.org noticed, a swap provider needing to go offline because of the high fees 15:05:40 Ruchnium - you dont think the particl team would do it? Theyre going to integrate bch 15:06:33 Maybe they would, but when? I don't know how to contact them 15:06:42 I'll contact them 15:06:59 #basicswap:matrix.org is their matrix room right? 15:07:18 pokkst said that he would like to look at the BCH<>XMR atomic swap implementation once the Samourai BTC<>XMR swap beta was launched. So he could look at it now I guess. 15:08:15 Ok. Right now I have set the "bounty" for verification of the cryptography at the "token appreciation" level of 1 BCH. But that could be negotiable. 15:08:19 comit swaps are abandonware and one way* im assuming the bch xmr swaps are both ways? 15:08:22 Rucknium: I'd pay out the bounty yet note obviously, it wasn't audited. 15:08:54 Yes, I did not intend to require a full code audit. Just a basic check 15:09:26 All swaps are both ways. Just some swap implementations only allow the limit order on one side of the book. 15:09:30 basicswap gets around it / (perhaps plans to get around it) by using their smsg system to automate the initiation of the transfer by whatever side has to initiate it 15:10:01 But the BCH<>XMR atomic swap implementation only allows the limit orders on one side like COMIT 15:10:30 not abandonware - low fees - one way, an improvement still 15:10:34 The Samourai swaps use the COMIT protocol. So it has been abandoned, put in the orphanage, and adopted. I guess. 15:10:42 lol 15:11:01 its 2 way if you use bch or another layer to automate the transfer intiation 15:11:15 s/bch/bsx 15:11:29 Bsx uses comit too 15:11:57 Farcaster ccs is marked as "completed" btw 15:12:11 nobody using it? :( 15:12:48 pokkst said he wanted to use COMIT instead of Farcaster for Samourai swaps because COMIT is a tested protocol. 15:13:35 let's test Farcaster :) 15:14:01 their web-ui works* it all works* 15:14:08 "FWIW, I think Taproot is cool in theory, and I even wrote the Taproot implementation for the ExtLibJ library SW uses (that isn't used for much atm/yet). But COMIT has been pretty well-tested and it works, and looks like a P2WSH multisig except in the cases of an adversarial swap, and in the future it's entirely possible to implement other protocols if/when they're ready. Not to m 15:14:08 ention most of Taproot is used for jpegs and shit anyway, last I checked, which don't look like normal, single-sig spends." https://nitter.net/pokkst/status/1748134805269569709#m 15:14:20 The protocol appears to have the proper cryptography from a knowledgeable source and appears to use it where appropriate to implement the swap protocol. 15:14:20 This is not a full check of exact compliance nor guarantee. 15:14:20 cc Rucknium: 15:14:44 Because scripts are not possible on blockchains like XMR, there are currently constraints on which coin can initiate a swap on BSX. To trade Monero for Bitcoin, for example, only the BTC-owning side can *initiate* a transaction. 15:14:44 Yet, because advance planning can be done consistent with atomic swapping, it is conceptually possible for both sides to effectively originate a swap: 15:14:44 If I have XMR and want, say, BTC, one could simply post a desire to do a trade as their offer. The BTC owner could then initiate the current, more formal process, still risk free. This process can be automated and be all but invisible to the front-end user experience, and is a major and very exciting upcoming item on the BSX roadmap. 15:14:47 Thanks for your cursory check, kayaba :D 15:14:54 https://particl.news/atomic-swap-style-showdown/ 15:15:03 That's really not valid commentary IMO :/ 15:15:16 (the above commentary on Taproot) 15:15:27 pokkst's commentary? Ok you can tweet at him 15:16:01 hot take on pokssts commentary 1/12 👇️ 🧵 15:16:12 Pokkst is on simplex too 15:16:29 I don't care to develop such an argument due to how one of their people called to lynch Seth. 15:16:43 oh 15:17:05 You mean s*th (taboo name) 15:17:19 If you say it 3 times in the mirror.. 15:17:57 Btw, while kaya is here 15:18:39 On cake's twitter space, kaya noted that he has been working on FCMP lately 😁 15:18:56 Continued work* on 15:19:08 Seth retweeted a teaser from the passport hardware wallet account (so Monero support confirmed then?.. i don't know) 15:20:02 any other recent highlights to discuss? 15:20:11 (Sgp since youre here - spirobels ban ended a long time ago) 15:21:38 spirobel is in policy asking for someone's ban 15:22:20 Calling for sgp's ban (just read) 15:22:30 ha 15:22:45 sigh 15:22:45 causing quite the stir on the reddits 15:22:58 I wouldnt go that far. But sgp banned hin for 1 week and hasnt unbanned hin afaik 15:23:35 We have an agenda. Next is... 15:23:39 this banning/unbanning process looks arbitrary. 15:23:41 plowsof: don't make me go to red it please 15:23:47 we can circle back to the juicy stuff later on, my perception is terrible.. i forgot he was banned myself , can be resolved 15:23:48 5. [CCS updates](https://ccs.getmonero.org/) 15:24:07 - Animated Videos: Nodes script [gitlab comment](https://repo.getmonero.org/monero-project/ccs-proposals/-/merge_requests/412#note_23203) - VostoEmisio 15:24:07 - [Boog900](https://repo.getmonero.org/monero-project/ccs-proposals/-/merge_requests/405#note_23183) 15:24:08 - [plowsof](https://repo.getmonero.org/monero-project/ccs-proposals/-/merge_requests/418#note_23209) 15:25:49 matrix users sorry for unclickable ehh.. animated videos have received some feedback already in here, vostoemisio is probably going ahead with the script linked above, and boog900 and plowsof have given updates for their ccs' this past week 15:26:37 I think I will be able to submit my proposed new decoy distributions for OSPEAD milestone 2 by January 31. More realistic is first week of February (I set an internal deadline of Jan 31 but I forgot to tell everyone who was contributing data, so we may be later 😅) 15:27:30 if think the eventual multisig signers for the ccs wallet should be a GH issue in itself, but so far, gingeropolous and jwinterm have publicly agreed to offer themselves up. them both being in the US was raised as a concern so other signers should be from [another place] ? 15:27:35 thanks for the update Rucknium 15:28:28 Lol 15:28:30 Next 15:29:00 Ty ruck 15:29:10 onto the ideas then 15:29:26 a. [hinto-janai - full-time work on Cuprate (3 months)](https://repo.getmonero.org/monero-project/ccs-proposals/-/merge_requests/422) 15:29:49 most recent change diffs can be seen here https://repo.getmonero.org/monero-project/ccs-proposals/-/merge_requests/422/diffs?diff_id=6494&start_sha=4598b1281af59f5a282720edd9f94ba06f8fa823 15:30:14 after my comment initiated some feedback / responses https://repo.getmonero.org/monero-project/ccs-proposals/-/merge_requests/422#note_23204 15:30:35 the proposal now has 5 updoots 15:30:50 Ill reserve my comments and leave my vote out 15:30:51 Also in monero-research and nwlb 15:31:05 I support hinto's CCS 15:31:49 lgtm 15:31:57 "Only people who care about this proposal are 1) re-write it in rust people 2) other cuprate devs and 3) kayabanerve (who wants a rust node that his serai dex can fall back on) / obtain pull requests from cuprate devs." 15:32:08 most of this has been responded / rebutted in the comments, what do you think about number 3 kayabanerve 15:32:12 Thats an unfair comment 15:32:19 Where is that quote from 15:32:25 myself / comment 15:33:01 we we tangentially funding serai dex without any kickbacks like we get from haveno (soon)? 15:33:16 it seems a bit pricey just for the database piece and then it's not clear how much further one person hours would be needed to finish cuprate I guess 15:33:17 I wanted monero-serai as a more functional Rust library for Monero. It has revealed multiple bugs in Monero now and Seraphis related work upcoming. 15:33:19 No. Were funding cuprate 15:33:29 Another node, in any language, will help identify bugs with the protocol and help standardize it. 15:33:39 and haveno kickbacks? Your believe erc's scamming ass? 15:33:45 whats wrong with LMDB hyc? why do cuprate have to redesign something 15:33:57 I have a CoI due to the fact I receive PRs. I have a personal preference for the usage of Rust. I don't want a Rust node though. I want another node. 15:34:07 We are using LMDB .... 15:34:12 Haveno is a private, for profit project 15:34:20 For Bitcoin, I'm considering a JS and/or Go node re: client diversity which proves your #3 is invalid. 15:34:46 LMDB has some problems, but thats coming up 15:35:03 Hinto doesnt seem to be working ON lmdb, just around it 15:36:04 FYI, the fact Monero will generate seeds it can't read back was a byproduct of monero-serai. Then, fingerprints in the rewritten RingCt wallet under koe's Seraphis work were identified. 15:36:55 Those are the most recent things I can chime in on. 15:37:38 Polyseed was also so broken, unfortunately :/ 15:38:51 the 5 voters (mostly other cuprate devs want it merged) , im not jumping to say merge atm nor do i want to close 15:39:10 Oh. monero-serai also caused a fingerprint fix in Monero itself re: sweeps having different fees, in extreme theory. 15:39:32 I'm not a Cuprate dev and advocate for it for the health and diversity of the Monero protocol. 15:39:35 its not a 3 month investment for the community, its more for several years 15:40:03 we can fund fixes in the monero protocol without funding cuprate 15:40:31 One thing to confirm, this doesnt effect gupax right 15:41:03 work on cuprate seems to have unearthed one or two issues in monero protocol, though. without that work, how would you know that you needed to fund fixes? 15:41:29 my work on Cuprate allows me to spot issues, I would be less likely to find them just be looking at the code 15:41:47 Tobtoht can you comment 15:42:44 It also helps detect accidental protocol changes. 15:42:54 I like this proposal, but I don't feel strongly about it. AFAIK, the database work probably won't uncover any subtle Monero bugs....but cuprate won't work without a database, so it's necessary for overall cuprate development. 15:43:05 Tobtoht is the best example 15:43:13 i echo jwinterms comment about it being pricey for just the database part 15:43:19 We fund feather 15:43:34 I echo the pricy part too 15:43:40 A bit way too pricy lol 15:43:45 But im not voting. 15:43:49 If cuprate can reduce or eliminate database corruption and/or pull output public keys faster to prepare for possible larger ring sizes, then that would be wonderful. 15:44:03 Back when I was doing my own crypto, I impl'd it in Nim (a thing of the time) and Python to ensure I didn't add impl-specific bugs. 15:44:33 I even made sure they didn't share libs (barring RandomX, which I didn't re-impl). 15:44:54 any other concerns to be put up for rebuttal on this? 15:45:22 You stare at the abyss. FCMPs stare back. 15:45:22 Roll for perception to see if you'll have a revelation. 15:45:31 :p 15:45:51 FCMP is still under development and we don't know if it will work 15:46:02 I'd support any node in any other language if I believed the team competent, as I do here. 15:46:16 I support the node impl 15:46:28 i think we have a full picture now of hintos proposal? wait for hintos response to this meeting then move forward with a decision? 15:47:20 it doesnt appear to be 8hrs a day or whatever its priced at 15:48:05 lets move on 15:48:10 The original CCS was for 3 months with the database being to goal but the potential to move onto other things 15:48:11 b. [0xfffc-2024Q1-(3 months, February, March, April, 2024)](https://repo.getmonero.org/monero-project/ccs-proposals/-/merge_requests/429) 15:48:37 so should hinto change it back? 15:49:25 because I feel we are just finding more and more things to delay this proposal 15:49:49 I blame my ban on your delay 15:50:06 Was on a roll getting shit done. Lol. Sorry 15:50:26 Random tuesday merge coming soon 15:50:43 a few concerns about price where raised in this meeting 15:51:03 the proposal was in a haystack, my comment has kick started engagement for the proposal 15:51:50 first time 0xFFFC has been mentioned in a meeting , thoughts? 15:52:15 has support from selsta/hyc (those mentioned in the proposal) 15:52:16 0xfffc has been working on repo with selsta for a couple months now 15:52:35 Is working with hyc on actually fixing lmdb issues 15:53:21 C++ work on the protocol is technical and hard to evaluate by people who have not worked on the protocol. The people who have worked on the protocol support 0xfffc's proposal, so +1 merge from me. 15:53:37 +1 from me 15:54:12 also the price is ridiculously low 15xmr/mth * 3 months = 45xmr 15:54:18 i dont see anyone else working on lmdb and we can use more devs. rates are more than acceptable and is already working 15:55:45 +merge from me 15:55:55 https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9378#c14 15:56:18 example of some of the work done with hyc 15:56:31 thanks for linking 15:57:12 thanks for attending 0xFFFC 15:57:14 Also yesterday, during review. Spotted a better fix and helped jeffro256 fix tobtohts old pr 15:57:51 <0xfffc:matrix.org> My pleasure, to be part of Monero community. 15:58:14 moving on with a few mins left 15:58:40 +1 15:58:49 c. [escapethe3RA Monero Observer maintenance (2024 Q1)](https://repo.getmonero.org/monero-project/ccs-proposals/-/merge_requests/430) 15:59:08 most recent update from his previous ccs: https://repo.getmonero.org/monero-project/ccs-proposals/-/merge_requests/414#note_23123 15:59:19 +1. We just did this retroactive. This is the current one, right? 15:59:27 yes 15:59:33 +1 Monero Observer 16:00:05 +1 consistency and quality 16:01:14 if anyone would like to share an update of what theyre working on / wish to see worked on please mention it 16:01:28 BSX 16:01:58 i assume their install instructions are why liquidity is so bad. so going to fix. 16:02:07 repo.getmonero.org was getting an .onion URL. Is this still the case? 16:02:14