01:39:26 it seems that ofrnxmr's sugar daddy is back 02:52:22 who's that? 02:58:05 https://kuno.anne.media/fundraiser/recb/ lmao 03:02:42 rotten will you commit to taking computer literacy classes if I donate 04:18:27 <3​21bob321:monero.social> Nate has failed you rotten 04:18:51 <3​21bob321:monero.social> All that time in TNO room and this happens -.- 04:26:18 but they were KYC-free, p2p scammers! 09:41:52 monerobull: I have removed the the hardware wallet support from the CCS as requested 09:42:23 I have also removed the atomic swap feature, as some requested also 09:42:38 So it focuses more on Haveno 09:43:07 https://repo.getmonero.org/monero-project/ccs-proposals/-/merge_requests/489 09:50:57 cool 12:46:07 geonic I'm sure you have never got gotten by scammers, and possess a PhD in "computer literacy", prestigious film maker. Defending your kind, scammer. 13:39:38 what 13:39:50 is geonic the CCS proposer for the movie with monero? 13:44:37 SyntheticBird the scammer. 13:44:47 Let's bring Monero to the oscars! 😂 13:45:17 I wont lie the notification read: SyntheticBird, the scammer. I was almost going to bring weapons on this one 13:49:25 SyntheticBird You are a scammer. 13:49:32 Bring the big guns out boyo. 14:10:04 I am having troubles with initial daemon local pruned sync - it got stuck a few times at the same height block. I restarted daemon to no avail, I deleted data.mdb too but eventually it would stall again. Any ideas ? 14:12:08 Screenshot 2024-08-20 at 17.11.15.png 14:12:19 Are you on a hard drive or an ssd? Did you open port 18080 on your router? How big is the drive that you are trying to download the blockchain to? 14:13:00 For me when I did the first 3 it worked but then I found out that 240gb isn't enough even for the pruned blockchain and that my drive was failing so I had to resort to a remote node 14:13:49 ssd port not opened the partition on the drive is 120 GB 14:13:58 You may also just have to wait really long, give it a day or two just in case you did everything and it still gets stuck 14:14:13 maybe there isn't enough space? How much gb do you have left rn with it stuck 14:14:17 I understand pruned size should be ~40-50 GB 14:14:33 volkodav97: Try `sync_info` in the monerod console 14:14:59 It should be but for me it ended up eating 120gb and became insanely slow to snyc so I gave up and used a remote node 14:15:38 Is the drive external with a USB connection or inside the machine? If it is an external USB drive, it will be slower, but it shouldn't stop completely. 14:16:18 internal 14:16:37 how long did you wait 14:16:52 It is at 22 Gb now with 54.9 % as you can see 14:17:09 last time it took about 4 hours 14:17:37 I started this journey about 30 hours ago 14:17:47 It stayed overnight with no results 14:18:23 Try #monero-support:monero.social 14:18:34 I have 92 Gb free on this partiton 14:29:37 file 1000036463.mp4 too big to download (2365686 > allowed size: 1000000) 14:29:39 1000036463.mp4 14:29:45 Screenshot 2024-08-20 at 17.25.55.png 14:43:12 no idea about the pruned size but it is significantly bigger tha 50GB 14:44:18 92 should be good if it is indeed all available, but close 14:44:57 all IRC gets is Screenshot 2024-08-20 at 17.25.55.png 14:45:04 lol :( 14:48:04 nioCat skill issue 14:48:08 just come to matrix side 14:48:10 we have: 14:48:22 - bad encryption (still better than no encryption) 14:48:26 Mind sharing a remote node? 14:48:28 - spams 14:48:35 - shitty interface (but still better than yours) 16:18:23 https://moneroworld.com/#nodes this website lists out nodes 16:23:10 monero.fail? 16:24:34 That too 17:09:37 Why does encryption in our messaging platform matter when all logs are public? 17:09:46 Just for the DMs? 17:10:05 We dont use encryption on matrix rooms 17:11:23 Dm's, yes, otherwise the server admin (and others) can read your past and present private messages 17:20:38 I trust dan not usingmy credit card number i let on an unencrypted channel 17:24:05 xmr.nowhere.moe 17:25:00 thanks 17:44:37 Is it worth using Tor for Monero stuff but not for much else? 17:44:39 Or is that useless/bad/leaky? 17:46:24 I use Tor for everything ngl 17:50:24 Too slow and unnecessary when you don't mind your IP address getting leaked (I.e. VoIP calls with family) 18:15:00 Has anyone tried orangefren.com? 18:15:01 trocador.app doesn't support buying xmr with fiat anymore 18:18:57 use simplex for family calls 18:18:59 better privacy than tor 18:20:45 I'll recommend simpleX to my family when they'll have a native UI instead of their current web crap 18:31:32 whats the problem with apps? 18:34:30 are there any kind of list/docs for monero or privacy related discontinued projects? 18:34:31 the ones that could be beneficial to the ecosystem if its picked up again 18:35:04 please take farcaster 18:35:06 are there any kind of list/docs for monero or privacy related discontinued projects? 18:35:07 the ones that could be beneficial to the ecosystem if its get picked up again 18:35:11 this is a cry for help 18:36:35 is that the only one? 18:37:11 No 18:37:38 Yooo 18:37:51 do you have a list or something? 18:39:49 WIP ccs list 18:40:06 More than a couple unfinished projects 18:40:18 It would help if we had an active todo list sort of thing for volunteers looking for an opportunity to help 18:40:32 Do you mind if i ask 18:40:33 What is farcaster 18:40:50 https://ccs.getmonero.org/work-in-progress/ 18:40:55 start at the bottom 18:41:25 Some of these arent "dead" 18:41:50 > > *Decentralizing Molly.im to support Monero payments* 18:42:08 nostalgia 18:43:55 https://github.com/plowsof/ccs-wip-list#other 18:45:09 is it worth it though? 18:46:31 Need to do ccs coordination some time and update the list 18:46:35 Theres cryptogrampy's hotshop 18:47:05 Still WIP sar. 18:47:11 afaik from the last meeting farcaster is technically and featurely superior to comit 18:48:07 is it really? 18:48:13 It was tough enough getting them on Signal. My dad has SXC installed though 18:50:20 It 100% is. 18:50:36 it's been so long I thought they abandoned it fr 18:50:45 I know you pay attention to the nonsensical, permanent heckling, pulled and twisted half truths of ofrn. 18:51:03 What did i do now 18:51:10 How can you say it's been abandoned if the other proposal just got a milestone completed and PR merged to monero's repository? 18:51:13 LMAO 18:51:16 Its 100% the trjth 18:51:27 that i wrote your responses 18:51:31 Are you retarded? 18:51:33 I didn't even know ofrnxmr said that rotten 18:51:44 What you laughing at? You high? 18:52:08 He is online 24/7 making shit up and heckling even inanimate objects. 18:52:19 Really satisfied having him muted in all apps and protocols. 18:52:22 did they completely abandoned it or there is some hope? 18:52:48 ??? There was another proposal 18:52:50 Can keep driving you guys insane with his bs. My screens and sanity are preserved. 18:52:55 idk rotten say they didn't 18:54:33 You are judging Molly and Oscar for the first proposal which is stagnant and contingent upon completing the second because coming up with payments on signal, as Molly, needs an Android SDK. 18:54:36 Molly? Its regularly updated but no monero progress in > a year 18:55:08 Its a signal fork, and i dont even like/use signal anymore so 🤷‍♂️ 18:55:14 Ofrn's unnecessary heckling and twisting truths to manipulate newcomers is absolutely nonproductive. This is just one clear example of many. 18:55:23 (Signal blocked me for using tor via molly) 18:55:35 But alas, luigi's BFF had to overrule unban. 🤷‍♂️ 18:55:54 bff? 18:55:59 Broski, ill share the posts where 18:56:18 The mere fact that the 2nd milestone of such 2nd proposal was completed and PR merged to monero, tells you he is working on them still. 18:56:34 You will not see any progress in first proposal till 2nd is all done. 18:56:37 I wrote youe response that gkt you unbanned, and where you asked me to attack geonic for you (and i declined) 18:57:04 I dont have to twist any truths 18:57:08 SyntheticBird Best friend forever. 18:57:17 Can y'all plz get a room 18:57:20 I didnt say anything about molly 18:57:29 I posted 2 links to a WIP list 18:58:19 jeffro256: 18:58:48 jeffro, real_glitch asked for list, i shared list and now rotten is going crazy for some reason. Idk how i got dragged into this. I'm blaming plowsof 18:59:37 are there any kind of list/docs for monero or privacy related discontinued projects? 18:59:39 the ones that could be beneficial to the ecosystem if it gets picked up again 19:01:10 Grampy's hotshop could use some improvements 19:03:03 Anyways. Celebrate. WIP. https://github.com/monero-project/monero/pull/9436 19:03:08 https://xcancel.com/monero/status/1825963024458375308 19:03:53 Kastelo, SolOptXMR, Kovri, etc come to mind 19:04:26 why Kovri over basic i2p 19:04:46 kovri is a unicorn 19:04:52 i was going to ask that 19:04:56 Eh with that one I was more listing "discontinued" versus "useful" 19:04:58 Job creation 19:05:12 jeffro256 :) 19:05:41 Creation? More like overtake... 19:05:43 Soloptxmr is "complete" according to mh 19:05:45 Job overtake. 19:06:24 And kastelo is 80% complete last i heard 19:06:44 And kastelo = msvb still giving stuff away for it 19:06:53 Monero Hardware 19:06:55 Are these projects on github 19:07:41 https://repo.getmonero.org/monero-project/ccs-proposals/-/issues/69 19:07:55 soloptxmr yes 19:07:57 kovri rip 19:07:59 kastelo js a hardware wallet Monero Hardware and hardware⊙go 19:08:38 They're part of the universe. 🌈 19:08:49 They're on our hearts. ❤️ 19:09:22 Why fund these project if they’re not maintained 19:09:35 Is there value in the dead codes 19:10:33 they werent funded after they died 19:11:39 Are there any community funded projects that were successful and still alive 19:11:54 Besides monero 19:12:03 yes. Monero 19:12:07 Hahah 19:12:56 Gupax 19:13:13 Gupaxx now 19:13:26 How long would gupax live without anyone supporting it 19:13:32 Unstoppableswaps 19:13:45 Feather wallet 19:13:59 Maybe that’s the bar that should be held to a ccs. When you stop working on it, how long can it fly off the cliff 19:15:53 <3​21bob321:monero.social> Put safety rails 19:16:06 gupax relies on p2pool and xmrig 19:16:20 Tuck a new rule for the CCS! 19:16:33 KISS philosophy or gtfo! 19:17:41 Would anyone be interested in a docker image that has a web gui and xmrig bundled together? A simple solo miner to place on your server. 19:18:09 Are there any community funded projects that were successful and still alive <== my movie :) 19:18:14 gupax 19:18:18 Unless it already exists. Maybe have a button to turn in and off 19:18:26 Gupax isn’t a server based miner 19:18:35 your movie wasnt funded by ccs 19:18:39 This would be like a self host service with a web gui 19:18:41 And it failed to win an oscar 19:19:38 Genomics movie will last forever. The dead code projects are worthless 19:20:31 wasn’t aware winning an oscar was a deliverable 19:20:38 <3​21bob321:monero.social> Vik 19:20:39 snowman agreed 19:21:09 <3​21bob321:monero.social> Via VHS 19:22:14 I discovered the bounties website and I think it is a much better mechanism for funding than ccs 19:22:58 " wasn’t aware winning an oscar was a deliverable" << the only deliverable was "submit to 100 festivals" and "win at one of them" 19:23:01 It’s very demand driven. The more demand, the more funding. It seems to be less susceptible to grifters 19:23:55 Geonics movie isnt available with a permissive license... and doesnt feature monero 19:24:24 The ccs was for marketing. And the marketing is done 19:24:33 <3​21bob321:monero.social> Arent ccs proposals meant to be open sauce ??? 19:26:11 Tssk tssk or questionable merges in the CCS repo tssk tssk tesla tssk tssk Locha net tssk tssk... 19:26:18 Bounties and ccs are completely different ways of attacking a problem. A bounty might exist for something that will never happen 19:26:29 What is locha 19:26:44 I could do tssk tssk till fluffy gets invited back to Core and Monero becomes legal tender in USA... 19:27:04 some mesh network that raised a lot of money from xmr, rhen went to go do the same to bch 19:27:30 <3​21bob321:monero.social> Project hoping 19:27:40 snowman A retarded CCS proposal that got merged for documenting how to use monero for a meshnet device. Just the documentation. No coding, no actual device working. We paid for that. Documentation. Because it was good for marketing! 19:27:43 <3​21bob321:monero.social> SHOW ME THE MONEY!! 19:27:52 "mesh network" << some pictures of wifi extenders and some marketing 19:28:03 And the guy was big in BTC community! 🤣 19:28:37 150 XMR and we didn't get a working device, nor support for XMR in it. 😂😂😂 19:28:40 https://ccs.getmonero.org/proposals/randybrito-locha-mesh.html 19:28:48 We got docs! 19:30:05 how much did you pay back to monero from your movie sales? 19:30:54 Can I create a ccs and take money for writing laser based Monero transmission documentation 19:31:19 You actually need to build the device yourself to read the docs 19:35:04 I like that the bounty site only pays out on completion. There’s a race for funding, but project ccs proposals look like they are grifted both in future maintenance, deliverables and no real need to complete before Monero goes parabolic 19:36:32 You get markdown, I get future xmr reward points 19:46:11 What about disallowing upfront payment entirely? 19:46:49 (excluding Research CCS for financing audits) 19:49:24 it seems like it fine for any ongoing developer funding. It looks like it's just the random code projects that really need the scrutiny. 19:51:19 I think it's kinda dangerous for random code projects tho. I agree on the trust aspect, but i really went to predictable way: 19:51:21 one project got upfront payment -> other wish to have upfront payment -> it happened one project failed -> blame CCS -> continue to wish for upfront payment 19:55:40 imho we should allow upfront payment for CCS if: 19:55:41 - The proposer have already completed two CCS 19:55:43 - The upfront payment does not exceed 20% of the total cost 19:55:45 - The upfront payment does not exceed the total amount of XMR earned through the CCS by the proposer 19:55:47 imho we should allow upfront payment for CCS if: 19:55:49 - The proposer have already completed two CCS 19:55:51 - The upfront payment does not exceed 20% of the total cost 19:55:53 - The upfront payment does not exceed the total amount of XMR earned through the CCS by the proposer 19:55:55 imho we should allow upfront payment for CCS if: 19:55:57 - The proposer have already completed two CCS 19:55:59 - The upfront payment does not exceed 20% of the total cost 19:56:01 - The upfront payment does not exceed the total amount of XMR earned through the CCS by the proposer 19:56:03 fuck sry for spam 19:56:05 Fractal is so bugged 19:56:07 <3​21bob321:monero.social> Rip nioc 19:56:22 <3​21bob321:monero.social> Better then before 19:56:40 true 19:57:16 but yeah i think these three rules make perfect sense for upfront payment 20:05:15 What is 20% of 1 million xmr 20:06:32 plowsof idk I can't read 20:07:47 me neither :( the ccs is designed in a way so that a large % of decisions have a certain number of people disagree with them 20:08:10 Every decision is wrong 20:09:57 The community make the rules in whatever moment of time the proposal is up for discussion , something about removing the red tape 20:10:08 If community says no to a proposer, its no. I have no issues with up front payments depending on the situation and project. 20:10:09 example: ccs that require paying for things 20:11:24 You can't require someone to go to the bank to get a loan to purchase goods or pay developers, then promise to reimburse them. 20:11:39 ofrnxmr the problem is that the community as you call it have disagreed and still disagree as of today on proposals. I'm not against flexibility, but for me these are reasonable improvments 20:11:54 Even geonics ccs, it needed money up front as the whole milestone 0 was to pay for submissions 20:12:29 mhm 20:12:30 mhm 20:12:34 oh no spam 20:12:54 2 prior proposals is also not realistic, unless the proposals are related 20:13:08 I would be tempted to say that if they are new comer and need funds upfront then CCS is not the system they want 20:13:26 More important than # of proposals is whether the community trusts the proposer to deliver 20:13:54 postpaid doesnt stop ANYONE from doinng 2/3 milestones and running away and delivering nothing 20:14:07 this is to avoid the: *Make an excellent first CCS to gain trust* then *Steal the 30% and go away* 20:14:22 We actually had a period where we were (are?) Against POSTPAID (lol.) 20:14:40 This is what milestones are 20:14:42 that's fair 20:15:08 And proposers _all the time_ "complete" 2 milestones and then leave the project in shambles 20:15:43 so what you say is if we don't trust we should abolish milestones all together? 20:16:38 i dont think milestones solve much, which is why a lot of proposers do them by month 20:17:38 at my understand month milestones only applys on open work CCS. not final product *development* 20:18:13 haveno and unstoppable are both month 1 2 3 etc 20:18:30 No real measure of what they have to accomplish in those timeframes 20:18:33 yes there are what I call open work CCS 20:18:46 the product already exist 20:18:51 it's just improvement/maintenance 20:19:21 im fine with these one 20:19:34 if they stop working on it, they stop being paid 20:19:38 some ccs have very clear milestones. Basically itemized billing 20:20:15 Which leaves the projects unmaintained and unfinished 20:20:24 Like haveno ui 20:20:33 yes? 20:20:39 but if it happen it'll happen 20:20:51 important is we didn't throw monero out of the window 20:21:13 donor's monero 20:21:35 We dkd throw money out the window of the projects are never finished, kr worse, never possible to finish them 20:21:53 dkd? kr? 20:22:11 The _leftover_ monero can be put to good use, but the spent monero is gone 20:22:17 Did* or* 20:22:28 s/of/if 20:22:45 yes exactly. that's the whole thing 20:22:59 the whole reason we're fighting over what proposals to accept in meetings 20:23:41 Retroactive proposals should be encouraged as long as they come with maintenance 20:23:52 retroactive? 20:23:56 Retroactive is basically m0 20:24:13 Up front payment for work already completed 20:24:45 like you mean: *I did something now I ask to be paid* 20:25:12 Kaya had 2 ccs, 300xmr and 900xmr 20:25:13 the 300xmr was retro. the work was completed and he was asking for payment in full. We didnt merge the ccs for like 6 months (because of ccs hack) 20:26:34 be precise. when you mean retroactive ccs, you mean work that have been done during the CCS approval phase or CCS opened after a work have been done. The later have an obvious problem 20:27:04 Yes. Like: _i made a service that turns pizza into monero. Pay me for it_ instead _im going to create a service that turns pizza into monero. First milestone is to make pizza and eat it. I promise ill finish milestone 3_ 20:27:35 Work that was done before the proposal was made 20:28:17 I dont see why yall prefer "trustmebro" over having someone actually deliver a poc 20:29:08 I disagree on this one. Why would we want to fund a project that someone started without funding. He did it already, unless you mean the CCS is to encourage on maintaining it 20:29:59 lets say i want to create a new ui for haveno 20:30:12 I think the whole no upfront payment purpose is that we don't have to "trustmebro" over someone. Milestones are a valid concern tho 20:30:31 Would you prefer i never do it? Or would you prefer if i did it, and delivered it and asked to be psid for the work i did? 20:31:15 its the same as a milestone, except the proposer is dispelling all doubt by delivering the milestone immediately 20:31:33 Either we can hope and pray that molly is finished 20:31:45 Or molly can add monero, then come and ask for funding 20:32:08 So basically I can do this super app I did, I keep it proprietary and then ask the monero community to pay for disclosing source code. That's kinda scammy ngl 20:32:25 no 20:32:33 it has to be open source in the idea stage 20:33:00 wait 20:33:03 so 20:33:28 Hello I've an idea: I want to make an Haveno UI 20:33:29 *it got accepted* 20:33:31 *finish the haveno UI* 20:33:33 *no I want to get paid* 20:33:45 so yes, anyone can "steal it" as soon as it is proposed 20:35:28 Again, I don't see why anyone would want to fund a project that started without notice unless it is for the dev to keep the good work. 20:35:41 Whats the difference between 20:35:43 1. Finish work and hide jt 20:35:45 2. Make proposal 20:35:47 3. Slowly release the finished work 20:35:49 4. Get paid 20:36:14 Literally ^ 20:36:15 why would you slowly release the finished work, if its already finish 20:36:46 and 20:36:47 1. Finish work and reveal it 20:36:49 2. Make proposal 20:36:51 3. get paid 20:36:53 4. Continue to work on it 20:37:11 ok so later is what I said 20:37:21 they god paid for keeping the good work 20:37:23 Because youd call me a scammer if i showed you the finished product before it was funded 20:37:26 Pay me to open source it vs pay me to complete it 20:37:39 If you dont incriminate yourself 20:37:55 but i can lie about The state of the project 20:38:16 I can claim its not started yet, and be lying 20:38:20 Example: janakas websjte 20:39:04 Janaka could have NOT started, and we'd have merged and funded the proposal 20:39:24 Because janaka already started, were treating the work done as out of scope 20:41:19 I dont have any issue with someone who completes the project before proposing. Its politics anyway. 20:41:21 6 in one hand, half a dozen in the other 20:41:24 sometimes I think we dont manage to communicate. With what you're saying me right now, the way I get it, is: You want CCS to fund an already existing project, or fund the dev to keep the good work over an accomplished project 20:45:09 This sounds scammy tho. The whole spirit of CCS is: 20:45:11 - I have an idea 20:45:13 - I need funding for working it 20:45:15 - When I accomplish the work it makes me receive the funds 20:45:17 - The community profits from my work 20:45:19 But when someone accomplish it before the funding. It just prove you didn't need the funding in the first place. So why would we want to donate to someone that doesn't need funding to work on it. 20:45:55 sounds like what plowsof said: Pay me to open source it 20:46:24 it's just a marketplace basically, and the only buyer is the community on the behalf of the monero project 20:46:41 i mean, im not against it 20:46:52 but its not what CCS strives for 20:48:24 lets invite all the ideas guys, and deter the get shit done guys 20:50:14 wdym. why would the original ccs purpose deter the *get shit done guys* 20:53:55 We’re assuming everyone is well informed of the CCS process and if not then though luck? :) 20:56:24 if not then don't accept the proposal 20:56:53 maybe it's time to judge the proposer beyond the the proposal 20:57:08 Like I kind of understood the bounty process for example, but didn’t know about the CCS process til later 20:57:47 That why I started work in my particular case 20:58:21 yeah the bounty process is straightforward. Incencitive to accomplish work. Get the shit done, get paid 20:58:41 Then half way through i realise that the terms are very specific and might not yield what i was expecting to I raise CCS to be specific. 20:59:05 Then half way through i realise that the terms are very specific and might not yield what i was expecting so I raise CCS to be specific. 20:59:57 I don’t think it was straightforward 🤷‍♂️ 20:59:59 im sorry I don't understand *what I raise CCS to be specific* mean 21:00:26 oh nvm i got it 21:00:31 sorry i'm tired 21:00:41 Me too lol I’m speaking shorthand 21:00:56 find out who the coordinator is and they should be able to help 21:01:02 yeah thats fair. if the bounty don't suit then make a ccs 21:03:27 It think it depends on the circumstances ultimately 21:03:30 (brb) 21:05:32 ? 21:06:12 The circumstances of who is requesting funds for they work and why 21:07:02 ah yes 21:07:20 The circumstances of who is requesting funds for their work and why 21:17:58 mother monero just wants to be improved 21:34:05 Can monerod run in an iOS swift app 21:35:08 I should also ask if it can be built to run on the iOS cpu 21:37:38 next step of my life: understanding apple toolchain for developers. (this seems like madness) 21:41:29 is it possible to view an incoming transfer before it has been confirmed by the network? 21:41:54 Yes 21:42:27 in most wallet you'll find it in the transaction tab and in Unconfirmed (if there is) or (sometimes) Locked balance 21:43:18 what is the function in the wallet rpc? 21:44:23 I suppose I can use get_transfers with pool=True ? 21:45:04 sorry i'm not kownledgeable on the wallet RPC 21:52:25 https://www.getmonero.org/resources/developer-guides/wallet-rpc.html#get_transfer_by_txid 21:53:26 monero-wallet-rpc has a --tx-notify flag to run a script passing certain params to it 21:56:23 yeah, but you need the transaction id. 21:56:34 I want to scan a subaddress for transactions. 22:02:24 maybe --tx-notify passes it 22:04:40 plowsof: I remember that this was not recommended when I was writing script for Bitcoin, I don't know how good that would be with Monero. 22:05:32 get_transfers does not seem to show transactions made within the same wallet/account. 22:05:57 --tx-notify is one of the only things that works in the rpc (i joke) 22:06:22 triggers on mempool.. and on 1st conf (or this behaviour can be configured to e.g. only on mempool) 22:06:48 you dont have to poll get_transfers or something else 22:09:26 will it sends notification during a resync after being off for a while? 22:15:36 yes, when wallet rpc is started after inactivity - it will send the tx id of new trasactions it see's. so in your script you'd have to account for this. e.g. if we're only concerned with mempool tx's then we check its number of confirms.. or we check our database that we've added all seen tx's to 22:17:45 depends what you want to do really. maybe something exists for it. there is an apprise monero fork (maybe apprise is wrong, as i couldnt find the repo immedietely but it adds notifs for all kinds of platforms (with --tx-notify at its heart) 22:18:34 neglected for years, not sure if working https://github.com/apprises/apprise-transactions 22:18:58 oh, I'm good with working with the official programs. 22:20:09 so using --tx-notify would be better than calling get_transfers? 22:20:39 Tx-notify takes a script an arguement 22:20:56 It will do whatever you tell it to when it sees a new tx 22:21:01 calling get_transfers over and over while rpc is doing that work for you under the hood is redundant 22:21:08 As an* argument 22:22:40 does monero docs explain --tx-notify 😅 there are several options , available in the monero-wallet-rpc help menu iirc 22:22:48 any documentation for --tx-notify besides --help ? 22:23:00 or rtfsc. 22:23:13 See the link that plowsof sent for an example 22:23:38 ive made a guide somewhere .. some python thing, a fun tutorial for beginners but im senile and dont know anymore 22:24:43 `Run a program for each new incoming transaction, '%s' will be replaced by the transaction hash` 22:24:51 btw, the developer guides page has a link to monerodocs.org which has expired and is now squatted. 22:25:15 alright so this is super simple. 22:25:15 https://test.monerodevs.org/interacting/monero-wallet-rpc-reference/ 22:26:46 Where do you see the link to monerodocs (so it can be fixed) 22:27:02 https://www.getmonero.org/resources/developer-guides/ 22:27:29 😅 thanks 22:27:39 fix fix.:) 22:27:48 i forgot to say .bbl 22:28:12 https://test.monerodevs.org is a fork for now, soon to be docs.getmonero.org 22:32:40 guides on jupyter hub (?) i made a "cURL before you can walk" for monero-wallet-rpc but didnt mention --tx-notify :( https://github.com/hyahatiph-labs/hlc/tree/main/xmr-dev-guides 22:35:45 success with --tx-notify. :P 22:36:44 https://ccs.getmonero.org/ideas/ 22:40:03 plowsof: you mentioned that --tx-notify can be configured so as to only trigger on mempool? 22:42:18 yes, not sure of the values off the top of my head but its configurable 22:42:39 default is at 0 confs and again at 1 22:45:20 but what's the variable? 22:47:04 or did i dream that the variable exists but it doesnt? https://monero.stackexchange.com/questions/12257/tx-notify-being-triggered-2-times-per-transaction 22:49:15 yeah, does not seem to exist. 22:49:22 not a big deal though. 22:49:33 database look up if youve seen the txid before would be best 22:50:48 yeah, doing exactly that. 22:58:50 accept rpc is terrible and move forward*