02:40:04 <Elijah[m]> does anyone know why the get_transfer json RPC method of the monero-wallet-rpc  does not return pending transactions even when pending=True? 
08:05:33 <string111[m]> Is there any different way of interacting with the Montero node  programmatically without RPC? Like some C++ or C libs, shared memory, Unix sockets etc.?
10:35:47 <Halver[m]> <Elijah[m]> "does anyone know why the..." <- ... maybe something to do with the `restricted-rpc` parameter ?
11:10:19 <pipeling[m]> <string111[m]> "Is there any different way of..." <- https://github.com/monero-ecosystem/monero-cpp
11:13:19 <sech1> moneromooo selsta what about hard fork schedule? https://github.com/monero-project/meta/issues/630#issuecomment-1013027880
11:25:20 <dEBRUYNE> We also need to contact Ledger and Trezor to see if they have sufficient time to upgrade their code
11:30:56 <sech1> AFAIK view tags are then only change related to the transaction format and it's a small change if they choose to just ignore them in the first versions supporting them
11:31:15 <sech1> *the only
11:31:34 <sech1> and ring size increase of course, but this should also be easy
11:37:15 <rbrunner> The whole multisig complex is also still waiting
11:39:33 <sech1> the point of the schedule is to merge everything, tag and then start testing/fixing thing in the next 30 days, right? And be ready by Feb 15th
11:39:57 <sech1> not tag, make a new branch
11:40:43 <rbrunner> Branch sounds better :)
11:43:42 <rbrunner> I have also something waiting (#8076) that I would love to get into this branch, but the review is not finished ...
11:43:49 <selsta> sech1: I wrote about it in #monero-research-lab, we have lost time with the multisig issues (that aren't resolved yet), ans bp+ isn't approved yet
11:45:21 <sech1> maybe the schedule needs to be changed then
11:46:14 <rbrunner> Yeah, branching tomorrow is a bit optimistic :)
11:48:02 <selsta> that multisig stuff is mostly resolved at least, UkoeHB has to PR the complete patch
11:49:23 <selsta> regarding bp+ I'll ping vtnerd again :)
11:55:16 <rbrunner> Does anybody have the GitHub PR search string ready to list all PRs that are not yet approved and where a review is missing and where maybe I could help?
11:57:54 <selsta> rbrunner: https://github.com/monero-project/meta/issues/630#issue-1058711566
11:58:09 <selsta> The ones listed here are the major ones
11:59:09 <rbrunner> Ok, thanks, but I was also thinking quite in general. Would be nice to have a good search string ready to periodically make a quick check whether some review is within the reach of my knowledge
11:59:56 <rbrunner> But somehow I was not successful. "review:none" gave me PRs that are already approved, so not very useful somehow ... or maybe I misunderstood
12:06:39 <rbrunner> Is there still a command here to check which PRs are already scheduled for the next merge?
12:06:41 <rbrunner> .merges
12:06:41 -xmr-pr- 8041 8044 8101
12:06:56 <rbrunner> That was it, right
12:24:44 <Humsher[m]> I was wondering if anyone could tell me. Is there a way to bind monerod/p2p to the interface name, instead of the IP address. The --p2p-bind-ip flag gives me an error if I try to use the interface name. If that's not possible I'd like to make that suggestion 🙂
12:26:37 <moneromooo> Not AFAIK. But I suspect the code would be OS dependent (if lucky, only windows would be annoying though).
12:46:07 <Humsher[m]> I can probably knock up a bash script to do it somehow now that I think of it.
13:05:19 <Elijah[m]> <Halver[m]> "... maybe something to do with..." <- I don't supply that cli option to Monero-wallet-rpc. 
13:39:31 <nioc> cdc.gov
13:39:46 <nioc> whoops
13:45:15 <Inge> BUSTED!
16:49:15 <retsiger[m]> Hi all, i often read that Monero has the 3rd largest developer community. Do you know of any sources for that statement?
16:55:58 <hyc> check coingecko, many other blockchain statistics sites
16:56:09 <hyc> not a relevant question for this channel
19:49:35 <Guest68> ok