02:54:25 <3 devs 07:26:44 selsta erciccione did you happen to remember the lupdate command we spoke some time ago? 07:27:12 Or maybe you have pointers on how can I figure it out? Thanks 08:57:13 netrik182: I'll check tomorrow in my irc logs, but if it's not in the logs then I don't have it 09:11:11 Ty 09:11:15 netrik182: the only one i can find is `lupdate qml.qrc -ts translations/monero-core.ts -no-obsolete && lupdate qml.qrc -ts translations/monero-core_*.ts -no-obsolete` 09:13:01 actually, i think that's the correct one, because the old one worked with the `.pro` file, that it's not used anymore 13:07:56 Right, at monerologs.net I found one that used .pro so this one is surely different 13:08:10 I can't test right now but will do it later 17:54:39 ErCiccione: that looks correct 21:55:53 moneromooo: any idea re https://github.com/monero-project/monero/issues/8142 ? 22:00:03 It's done on a timer IIRC (kinda). 22:00:31 IIRC, when adding a new block, it goes through the checks if last check was > some threshold. 22:01:00 I see the reporter did not mention any period for that behaviour. 22:03:23 20 seconds to go through all is scary slow though, so maybe 20 seconds is the period, and the first and last messages are not part of the same set. 22:04:16 The code shows the delay for the file based checkpoints is 10 minutes. 22:06:04 The only reason I can think of for rapid repeats is if there's an exception after checking, which skips seting the "last check" time. But you'd have a stack trace in your log, unless you built without libuwind. 22:09:58 I added a comment.