03:45:03 <mj-xmr[m]> https://paste.debian.net/1239153/
03:45:20 <mj-xmr[m]> My sha256 sums.
03:46:43 <mj-xmr[m]> <jeffro256[m]> "mj-xmr[m] Can you see my..." <- Yes. I'm just in EU timezone.
03:49:20 <jeffro256[m]> mj-xmr I put comments like 3-4 days ago but I think I put it in a pending review on accident and didnt submit it
03:49:29 <jeffro256[m]> my bad
03:49:35 <mj-xmr[m]> Aaaah. Classic :)
04:04:26 <mj-xmr[m]> <sethforprivacy[m]> "Seems good! https://github.com/..." <- Yep :)
04:35:25 <JayendraMadara[m> HEYY people good morning... (full message at https://libera.ems.host/_matrix/media/r0/download/libera.chat/f825b2226b87c5a8ceecf5f0b88163b562e89409)
04:36:01 <selsta> JayendraMadara[m: please ask in r/moneromining on reddit, this channel here is for monero development and not mining
04:36:10 <selsta> you will get a better answer there
04:36:26 <JayendraMadara[m> thank youuuu
04:45:45 <mj-xmr[m]> Here's an easier alternative that fixes the stale submodules problem:
04:45:45 <mj-xmr[m]> https://github.com/monero-project/monero/pull/8296
12:16:18 <hyc> not sure why you think submodules are still a problem. it only happened to me because my repo had a bunch of local changes in it, including an explicitly checked out submodule
12:19:28 <hyc> most people will be building from a clean tree
16:36:00 <UkoeHB> Anyone know much about block ciphers (especially blowfish)? I am wondering about the implications of ciphering the same block multiple times, i.e. in order to have a cipher text that isn't a multiple of the block size.
16:36:40 <UkoeHB> my use case (second half): https://gist.github.com/tevador/50160d160d24cfc6c52ae02eb3d17024?permalink_comment_id=4144862#gistcomment-4144862
16:50:39 <mj-xmr[m]> <hyc> "not sure why you think submodule..." <- It happened to me as well. Most people were us :)
16:51:29 <mj-xmr[m]> I think a command of setting up environment shouldn't astonish people.
16:51:34 <mj-xmr[m]> Thanks for approving anyway.
17:26:16 <moneromooo> It must be fine, since this is quite likely to happen with disk encryption, where file headers are often the same. With different nonces obviously.
17:26:36 <moneromooo> (and with a good mode)\
18:57:56 <UkoeHB> Anyone have a recommended AES implementation? I think AES would be better than blowfish for 128-bit jamtis address indices.
18:59:22 <moneromooo> If it is for coding for monero, I suggest the one in the monero tree, with the argument that if it's broken, it already breaks monero.
19:01:55 <UkoeHB> moneromooo: is it a full implementation? I see this `aesb.c`, but it doesn't seem complete (encrypt and decrypt)
19:02:43 <moneromooo> Good point. It might be encrypt only. If so, you could look for the matching decrypt on the internet, it's likely the original includes both.
19:15:28 <hyc> aesb.c just has a couple steps, yeah, not full algo
19:16:10 <hyc> you want oaes_lib.c
19:17:09 <hyc> oaes_encrypt, oaes_decrypt
19:18:50 <UkoeHB> sweeet thanks hyc 
19:21:37 <moneromooo> Just check whether you end up in a code path that uses rand, IIRC that code uses it, though we don't hit that path.