02:18:53 <luigi1111w> ok
05:49:51 <hyc> this is my build of release-v0.18 https://paste.debian.net/1270930/
08:18:39 <sech1> hyc1 but it's not tagged yet, your hashes won't match
09:54:21 <hyc1> yeah, but other folks could build the release branch while waiting for the tag
12:20:31 <selsta> anyone here familiar with SELinux? what should I suggest here? https://github.com/monero-project/monero-gui/issues/4119
12:20:39 <selsta> seems Qt uses JIT which gets blocked
16:25:13 <Monegro> Someone on Twitter had an idea I thought was great.
16:25:50 <Monegro> If we keep tx_extra, what about charging significantly extra fees for using it? (assuming it remains optional)
16:37:45 <xmrack[m]> Pretty sure that has been proposed before
16:38:09 <xmrack[m]> Also wrong channel
16:39:41 <moneromooo> Many times, and this is a suitable channel (though it'll just result in rehashing stuff again probably).
16:40:09 <moneromooo> I don't remember anyone really being for this though.
17:11:24 <fluffypony> Monegro: doesn't solve the uniformity issues
18:03:07 <Monegro> Definitely doesn't solve uniformity. Not trying to rehash anything, just something I didn't hear mentioned yesterday (for the hypothetical case tx_extra was kept).
18:05:12 <UkoeHB> Monegro: if you increase the tx extra fee too much then people will start using steganography. You can only really increase the fee until the cost of tx extra is equivalent to the cost of steganography.
20:26:48 <Rucknium[m]> Monegro: It was mentioned in the GitHub issue thread: https://github.com/monero-project/monero/issues/6668
21:48:52 <moneromooo> Or a bit more, so that people favour steganography.
21:49:40 <moneromooo> I'm not sure why I thought the effective ring size reduction was so bad at the time. It doesn't seem like a huge barrier right now...