01:07:44 <xmrack[m]> Is there a way that I can just get the code needed to compile wallet2? Including dependencies and what-not
01:08:30 <xmrack[m]> well not just wallet2. I want to compile the monero-wallet-cli but nothing else.
01:12:17 <selsta> `make -C build/release simplewallet` just builds cli wallet
20:21:05 <greenpillow11[m]> We’re working on a crosschain AMM. Based on that, we’ve got some questions.
20:21:05 <greenpillow11[m]> Our project is based on monero multi-sig wallet. Currently, Monero marked multisig as experimental after a few issues they found out last year, I am not sure whether they are aware of any other issues with multisig. So first, is multi-sig wallet truly secure?
20:21:05 <greenpillow11[m]> Second: Current approach, we are based on tx_proof, which when user deposit to our chain, they need to generate a tx proof, and then claim it from our chain, and our chain will NOT expose any view key, tx key etc. Is this a good approach? Any tips? 
20:48:32 <rbrunner> greenpillow11[m]: In my understand we marked multisig "experimental" because we simply don't know whether it's truly secure.
20:49:02 <rbrunner> To make sure an external review and something called "security proof" would be needed; both are currently lacking.
20:49:29 <rbrunner> I don't rememember now what the last word was how we intend to proceed into the future
20:50:08 <rbrunner> but it may well be that things will only leave experimental state together with the introduction of Seraphis
20:51:17 <rbrunner> Our current "resident multisig specialist" for such questions is MRL researcher UkoeHB
20:52:00 <rbrunner> You may try to contact him on the MRL IRC channel #monero-research-lab if you have detailed questions
20:53:01 <rbrunner> About the second question I can't say anything because I don't know much about AMMs in general, and of course neither about yours in particular
20:53:48 <rbrunner> No need to hand out any secret keys sounds good but I don't know what the pros and cons of doing something with tx proofs are