16:54:16 <selsta> so should we put out a release with https://github.com/monero-project/monero/pull/8733 ? any voices against it?
17:19:41 <UkoeHB> fine with me
17:25:01 <sech1> Not against it, but it should be created against release-v0.18 branch
17:28:13 <sech1> speaking of, need to finally review it
17:39:49 <rbrunner> Against? Nope. Will be interesting to see how we fare with it.
18:02:50 <selsta> will open against release
19:03:28 <selsta> please also approve: https://github.com/monero-project/monero/pull/8784
19:17:10 <selsta> .merge+ 8784 8733 8781 8707
19:17:10 <xmr-pr> Added
19:26:11 <selsta> .merge+ 8775 8779
19:26:11 <xmr-pr> Added
20:12:34 <moneromooo> Why are functional tests now setting --allow-mismatched-daemon-version ? There's no apparent attempt at using disparate versions for testing purposes.
20:13:22 <moneromooo> jberman[m]: comes from a patch of yours
20:31:46 <jberman[m]> In the patch that ensures the wallet is connected with a daemon on the same fork, the wallet reads the compiled hardfork->height set in hardfork.cpp
20:32:16 <jberman[m]> IIRC the functional tests overwrite hard fork heights at runtime on the daemon side, not client, which messes up that patch's logic
20:33:00 <jberman[m]> Also IIRC the simplest solution was to just reuse that existing flag for the wallet to skip that check in tests
20:37:02 <moneromooo> Thanks.
20:45:32 <Guest56> should i use monero-wallet-rpc or the python library?
20:51:33 <plowsof11> if you see 'i' around, tell them to ask in#monero-community-dev:monero.social , they will probably need to provide some more information 
20:52:11 <moneromooo> Assuming you're talking about utils/python-rpc/framework/wallet.py, this talks to a running monero-wallet-rpc process.
20:52:37 <moneromooo> It just replaces manual JSON skullduggery.
20:55:03 <Guest56> any advantages/disadvantages of one over another?
20:56:42 <Guest56> and also i was talking about this https://github.com/monero-ecosystem/monero-python
21:00:05 <Guest56> but i will look into that too
21:01:57 <moneromooo> I don't know about the link you gave, but the advantage of the one in the monero repo is that it's one-one with the monero RPC. So it gives you access to everything.
21:02:11 <moneromooo> I guess a disadvantage is that it's as low level as the RPC API.
21:02:29 <moneromooo> An advantage is that it's tested :)
21:02:38 <moneromooo> But maybe the other one also is.
21:03:34 <Guest56> were you talking about this at first? https://pypi.org/project/python-monerorpc/
21:08:26 <moneromooo> No, unless this is copied from the monero repo.
21:08:41 <moneromooo> I was talking about the files in utils/python-rpc/framework in the monero repo.
21:10:45 <Guest56> i found it but is there a documention for it?
21:11:46 <moneromooo> No.
21:12:48 <moneromooo> You can look at what the console (utils/python-rpc/console) does.
21:12:51 <Guest56> json looks more appealing
21:13:00 <Guest56> at this point
21:13:28 <Guest56> how do i look tho?
21:14:00 <moneromooo> You start with something of a G really. You have letters at the end. Short nick, but not *too* short.
21:15:00 <Guest56> what do you mean
21:15:38 <moneromooo> Reread the sentence along with your question from right before it :)
21:16:00 <plowsof11> a gearch engine 
21:17:34 <Guest56> what letters
21:18:04 <moneromooo> Oh my mistake. I meant numbers :( Guess that made it confusing.
21:18:12 <moneromooo> But ignore that line, it was a joke.
21:18:28 <Guest56> you mean google?
21:18:39 <moneromooo> No -_- nevermind...
21:19:25 <plowsof11> "how do i look tho?" as in , my physical appearance , i just got it 
21:19:32 <moneromooo> ^_^
21:19:47 <Guest56> https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/gearch/ajpolkacopbfgpehhoahbdbphpeapclg?hl=en
21:56:11 <luigi1111w> moneromooo did you see the email about confirmation emails on ccs
21:56:44 <luigi1111w> .merges
21:56:44 -xmr-pr- 8076 8707 8733 8743 8745 8746 8775 8779 8781 8784
21:58:10 <selsta> .merge+ 8785
21:58:10 <xmr-pr> Added
22:00:00 <moneromooo> No. I last looked at emails probably more than a year ago.
22:00:46 <moneromooo> Assuming it's not been disconnected for inactivity...
22:01:43 <luigi1111w> is there any reason the emails on ccs wouldn't be working? I'm not sure who's responsible for that
22:02:19 <moneromooo> I think I'm supposed to be. I'll go look around.
22:07:05 <moneromooo> 5 million users... Spammers been busy...
22:17:23 <luigi1111w> ^__^
22:17:51 <plowsof11> lol
22:18:03 <moneromooo> Might be fixed.
22:18:50 <luigi1111w> plowsof11 will try it for us
22:19:22 <moneromooo> Ah, probably not. Errors are back after a promising start...
22:20:43 <luigi1111w> Monero: A promising start
22:21:07 <moneromooo> One Of These Starts Is The Real One.
22:21:36 <luigi1111w> hi moneromooo how are you
22:21:38 <moneromooo> Well, one email's gone to... someone.
22:21:47 <moneromooo> Hey luigi1111w long time no type
22:21:53 <plowsof11> Please check your email (plowsof+sock⊙pc) to confirm your account
22:22:11 <plowsof11> clicked confirm, seems to work
22:22:13 <moneromooo> That one has gone out, according to logs.
22:23:29 <luigi1111w> my types per day has indeed plummeted
22:23:41 <moneromooo> plowsof11: was this not working before ? I'm asking because only some types of mail might be borked.
22:23:51 <luigi1111w> we have limited tx extra now. What is this world coming to
22:24:15 <plowsof11> thanks moneromooo, its fixed now. before - a bogus lol⊙lc email could be entered and you can begin posting 
22:24:46 <moneromooo> Huh. Well I certainly didn't do anything to fix *that*.
22:24:48 <plowsof11> now its requiring email confirmation 
22:35:42 <plowsof11> recently, the gitlab server had its OS updated.. perhaps the issue was fixed after that, either way, thanks mooo! 
22:36:17 <moneromooo> I just updated it after you said mail was fixed. Might as well.