02:09:43 <m-relay> <m​808:matrix.org> Is it expected that `monero-wallet-cli` with the `--generate-from-view-key` flag isn't able to parse a testnet address (no problem with a mainnet address) (Returning `Error: failed to parse address`) when asking for the Standard address, even with the `--testnet` flag ?
07:20:40 <sech1> No, it should work with testnet addresses. You probably found a bug.
09:26:32 <j7771122> hello, everyone, I wanna create my own token at monero network. What is solution?
09:36:48 <sech1> You can't
10:02:52 <j7771122> why? this network does not provide custom token like ERC20, BRC20?
10:04:06 <sech1> Thank God it does not
10:04:52 <m-relay> <e​ndor00:matrix.org> Turns out, you don't actually need a token for most things
10:08:41 <m-relay> <1​23bob123:matrix.org> hmm
10:16:11 <j7771122> I need really my token. then what is solution?
10:18:20 <sech1> ERC20, BRC20?
10:23:49 <m-relay> <1​23bob123:matrix.org> What about json web token
12:11:42 <gingeropolous> 7345 needs a review... from my perspective, all the changes are in network code
21:26:40 <m-relay> <j​effro256:monero.social> moneromooo: what is the point of the merge mining slots ?
21:27:08 <m-relay> <j​effro256:monero.social> Why not order lexographicaly?
21:52:09 <sech1> jeffro256 if you order lexicographically, then you to send all merge mined chain IDs together with the merkle proof to prove that you don't mined double spends/alternative chains
21:52:16 <sech1> *you need to send
21:53:02 <sech1> this was initially developed in namecoin in 2011: https://forum.namecoin.org/viewtopic.php?p=1617#p1617
21:54:06 <sech1> yes, you can just order lexicographically, but it will make proof to be O(N) bytes instead of O(logN)
23:59:07 <m-relay> <j​effro256:monero.social> Ah that makes a lot of sense, thanks for that