03:23:44 <white_yeti> Does anyone knows if the author(s) of this project https://github.com/creating2morrow/neveko hangs in here?
06:44:24 <ArticMine> The tail emission is mentioned in this post https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.0 Note: the figure of 0.3 XMR per block refers to when Monero had 1 min blocks. It was changed to 0.6 XMR when Monero hard forked to 2 min blocks to maintain the inegrity of the money supply / social covenant. The very early versions of the post had less than 1%, and yes the idea was that Monero would at most have an inflation rate than the historical 
06:44:24 <ArticMine> inflation rate of gold. 
06:46:53 <ArticMine> Here is a history of this post https://web.archive.org/web/20140615000000*/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.0
06:49:12 <ArticMine> Essentially the allowance for the tail emission was "lock in" via a social covenant in the early posts, as less than 1% It was subsequently added to the code. I believe in 2014 or 2015. I recall actually insisting on this
06:50:59 <ArticMine> The rest is history. 
06:54:32 <ArticMine> Also very relevant is that smmoth developed the theory that an equilibrium between the tail emission and lost coins will actually to a stable money supply. There is an excellent article by Peter Todd on this subject https://petertodd.org/2022/surprisingly-tail-emission-is-not-inflationary
06:55:25 <ArticMine> Correction: smooth
06:59:14 <ArticMine> By the way the entire security model rests on the tail emission. If it were not for the tail emission Monero would fail to 51% attacks and spam attacks. This being said many back in 2014 myself included did not realize the critical importance of the tail emission. We were after all Bitcoiners some of use even former Bitcoin maxis.
07:02:00 <ArticMine> I gave up on Bitcoin in 2015.
07:03:47 <ArticMine> When Roger Ver was censored over scaling.
07:05:08 <ArticMine> That confirmed my suspicion that the technical problems were insurmountable and consensus was likely impossible
07:07:24 <ArticMine> Censorship in my view was a symptom of insurmountable technical problems.
10:10:22 <m-relay> <k​4r4b3y:karapara.net> ArticMine, I am interested in learning about the dynamic blocksize dynamics
10:11:29 <m-relay> <e​ndor00:matrix.org> k4r4b3y: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=btauHXDIM8M
10:12:06 <m-relay> <e​ndor00:matrix.org> From the man himself
10:29:12 <m-relay> <k​4r4b3y:karapara.net> Specifically, how the mechanics around the miner earnings, the blocksize growth, and the transaction fee dynamics.
10:29:13 <m-relay> <k​4r4b3y:karapara.net> Where can I read on these topics. Preferably, in a non math-heavy format, as I am a novice in my understanding currently.
10:29:13 <m-relay> <k​4r4b3y:karapara.net> I listened to this talk back when it was released. However I got lost as the presentation went on about the maths. I would prefer some blog-post-like, verbal explanation of the dynamics first. And then, I can dive into the maths if mecessary.
10:29:14 <m-relay> <k​4r4b3y:karapara.net> Well my messages aren't being sent i guess.. Test
16:48:26 <UkoeHB> k4r4b3y: zero to monero v2 section 7.3. It's a little outdated but still quite accurate.
16:48:53 <m-relay> <k​4r4b3y:karapara.net> Alright. I will see it. Thank you.