14:15:28 <xFFFC0000> Do we have something to run a heavy-benchmark? I was thinking about a benchmark that would create N wallets (hundrads), generate M addresses for each wallet (thousands), and run T transactions (millions). All on a single machine, and on --regtest.
14:17:59 <moneromooo> tests/functional_tests
14:19:01 <xFFFC0000> moneromooo: I did take a look at it. But didn't appear to me they are putting as much as pressure. For example look at this: https://github.com/monero-project/monero/blob/059028a30a8ae9752338a7897329fe8012a310d5/tests/functional_tests/speed.py#L74
14:19:50 <xFFFC0000> and it is a single wallet. I might be missing something though since today was a first time I was playing with functional_tests
14:26:59 <moneromooo> You are meant to add the tests you want :)
14:27:55 <moneromooo> But these drive many monerod and monero-wallet-rpc. That's what you asked. Add a dos.py file, and do what you want
14:28:19 <xFFFC0000> This one is much better: https://github.com/monero-project/monero/blob/master/tests/functional_tests/transactions_flow_test.cpp#L168  But I can do better. We can do (N * M * T) 
14:30:28 <xFFFC0000> s/I/we/
14:39:25 <xFFFC0000> I will work on something like that. Will send PR in few days. 
16:24:08 <m-relay> <e​mpowerelixir:matrix.org> hi everyone, i've been trying to sync testnet to the cli wallet, but it never starts, any idea why?
16:24:08 <m-relay> <e​mpowerelixir:matrix.org> running on linux mint
16:25:12 <m-relay> <e​mpowerelixir:matrix.org> is it possible that there just aren't any peers?
17:01:55 <jeffro256> If you run the "status" command, what does it return?
17:06:17 <m-relay> <e​mpowerelixir:matrix.org> height 1/1 (100%) on testnet, not mining net hash 0 H/s, v1, 0(out)+0(in) connections
17:06:23 <m-relay> <e​mpowerelixir:matrix.org> tried running overnight, no change
17:10:04 <m-relay> <e​mpowerelixir:matrix.org> oops just realized that wasn't a reply to me lol
17:11:59 <rbrunner> It probably was. Testnet seems healthy, seednodes are up: https://tools.rino.io/xmr-seed-nodes/testnet
17:12:32 <rbrunner> I would guess your OS simply, or your router, or whatever, simply does not allow monerod to reach out
17:22:15 <m-relay> <e​mpowerelixir:matrix.org> hmmm
18:49:05 <m-relay> <d​etherminal:matrix.org> Who hosts the seednodes?
19:00:55 <moneromooo> I have one.
19:01:36 <moneromooo> Pretty sure pony, binaryfate and gingeropolous have one of those too.
19:02:06 <moneromooo> The git log should tell you more.
19:03:47 <ofrnxmr> Plowsof can tell you
19:04:09 <ofrnxmr> He has a script that checks em too
19:38:00 <plowsof> A smiley face for everyone running a seed node https://github.com/plowsof/check-monero-seed-nodes
19:39:01 <plowsof> But yes, the git log
19:40:47 <plowsof> Jeffro256/selsta/lza_menace off the top of my head (me too)
19:47:34 <m-relay> <j​effro256:monero.social> I don't run a seed nose
22:19:40 <selsta> .merge + 9136
22:19:48 <selsta> .merge+ 9136
22:19:48 <xmr-pr> Added
23:36:52 <m-relay> <p​reland:matrix.org> Potentially dumb question: just how many things would break if the block difficulty and the tail emission were cut in half?
23:36:52 <m-relay> <p​reland:matrix.org> In theory, this would also cut confirmation times in half, but at what cost? I’m aware that would increase the rate of blockchain size growth, though I don’t know by how much. I’m also not sure what the security implications of it would be (I guess it would be easier to 51%)
23:53:44 <m-relay> <d​etherminal:matrix.org> it would potentially increase fees