04:11:29 <m-relay> <v​tnerd:monero.social> selsta: tracked down woodser issue. Just needed new flag for private rpc connections
04:12:01 <m-relay> <v​tnerd:monero.social> Next up is the windows+boost thing? Is that still a concern
04:55:09 <m-relay> <o​frnxmr:xmr.mx> Its fixed by https://github.com/monero-project/monero/pull/9807 but
04:55:33 <m-relay> <o​frnxmr:xmr.mx> .
04:56:00 <m-relay> <o​frnxmr:xmr.mx> And "We only support Debian 10 (Boost 1.67) until June 30 (EOL + 1 year), so if the workaround isn't possible / doesn't happen it's not that big of a deal imo."
09:11:20 <selsta> vtnerd: we work around it by 9807 for release like ofrnxmr said, but ideally we would fix it in code
09:11:34 <selsta> but that's not a priority right now for this release
11:06:53 <m-relay> <g​ingeropolous:monero.social> woodser, i can;t get my testnet past v2. how many blocks do you have to give each version? and what do you use for that "time since epoch" field?
11:12:11 <m-relay> <s​yntheticbird:monero.social> That's it? woodser issue down? NEW RELEASE INCOMING?
11:14:15 <m-relay> <g​ingeropolous:monero.social> figured out the epoch thing
11:59:25 <m-relay> <w​oodser:monero.social> I use only 10 blocks between versions: https://github.com/haveno-dex/monero/commit/80d0e45acd88239394ba566d14c18c2660648b8d
14:50:24 <m-relay> <a​shven:matrix.org> Hi everyone
14:51:01 <m-relay> <a​shven:matrix.org> I am interested in knowing have any discussion went so far regarding Clover over Dandelion ++
14:51:32 <m-relay> <a​shven:matrix.org> If so why Monero keeping dandelion ++ over simpler tech like Clover?
14:52:34 <m-relay> <a​shven:matrix.org> It seems Clover has optimal precision and more resistance to active adversaries so why?
15:32:02 <moneromooo> While I have no idea what Clover is beyond what you imply, a substantial obstacle to adding stuff is the lack of someone that does it.
15:33:17 <moneromooo> If you're interesting in this being done, file a bug on github with the request, and arguments. Maybe someone will decide to add it.
15:33:27 <moneromooo> In the meantime, discussion can be had there to see pros/cons.
16:18:33 <m-relay> <a​shven:matrix.org> I am interested actually but it requires consensus to change the protocol of the node I needed first to know why denadlion ++ over Clover I was hoping if somone would Enlighten me because maybe I am wrong of Clover being better than dandelion++
16:19:11 <m-relay> <a​shven:matrix.org> We have only one node implementation also as far as know
16:20:49 <m-relay> <m​arithemari:matrix.org> There's a rewrite in rust called cuprate being developed. It's still in the early stages of it's development but it's something.
16:27:01 <m-relay> <r​brunner7:monero.social> Rucknium, present mostly over in https://matrix.to/#/#monero-research-lab:monero.social, probably knows about Clover and how it compares to Dandelion++.
16:27:31 <m-relay> <o​frnxmr:xmr.mx> Monero Research Lounge  for more casual