07:40:44 <sech1> jeffro256 chatgpt 5.5 codex (xhigh) didn't like something in make_pool_supplement_from_block_entry: https://github.com/SChernykh/ringct-bulletproofs-plus-review-claude/blob/main/RINGCT_SECURITY_REVIEW_gpt_5.5_xhigh.md#m-03-pruned-synchronization-drops-the-authenticated-prunable-hash
08:46:13 <tobtoht> .merges
08:46:13 <xmr-pr> 9251 10512 10543
14:16:54 <br-m> <jpk68:matrix.org> jeffro256: FWIW it looks like a Trezor dev responded to the open issue about Safe 7 support, maybe you would be able to get in contact that way?
14:16:55 <br-m> <jpk68:matrix.org> https://github.com/monero-project/monero/issues/10368#issuecomment-4649461953
18:27:11 <br-m> <handpickencounter:matrix.org> Will the FCMP++ upgrade make Monero's privacy zero-information (information theoretically secure; proof against CRQC) just how TornadoCash and zcash and a generic centralized blind signature scheme are right now (CRQC allows coin forging but not privacy violation)?
18:36:51 <jeffro256> Please ask in #monero-research-lounge 
18:38:43 <jeffro256> @jpk68: yeah perhaps. Personally, I think that the private company which would benefit from users being able to use Monero on their devices should be the ones funding the development of said support, but I would like to see it, and I would be willing to work on it if Trezor paid me 
18:40:07 <br-m> <jpk68:matrix.org> I'd have to agree with you there... unfortunately at this rate we might not have too much of a choice :(
18:40:59 <br-m> <jpk68:matrix.org> Trezor clearly doesn't see Monero support (or dev-friendliness in general) as a priority
18:57:36 <br-m> <kiersten5821:matrix.org> @handpickencounter:matrix.org: i think both tc and zcash historical tx are capable of having their privacy broken by crqc
19:06:14 <br-m> <ofrnxmr:xmr.mx> jeffro256: @kiersten5821:matrix.org  ^