05:17:56 <br-m> <entropyhoover:matrix.org> May I know why the simple mode only connects to one node only? Is there any reason for not using multiple nodes for fetching data in parallel?
08:08:47 <tobtoht> .merges
08:08:47 <xmr-pr> 10820 10865 10872 10886 10887 10934 10964 11054 11074 11108 11121 11122 11123 11125
08:21:07 <br-m> <rbrunner7> @entropyhoover:matrix.org: I think the main reason why wallet sync does not fetch data from several daemons in parallel is that nobody has implemented that, and I think it could also turn out to be quite complex to do correctly and watertight.
16:53:35 <br-m> <tobtoht> StageX images are x86_64 only. I think there are plans to add ARM64. > <@vtnerd> @tobtoht:monero.social: isnt stagex x86-64 only though? Or is that changing soon? I had a patch to make lws stagex compliant but stopped because of that
16:53:49 <br-m> <tobtoht> Monero release builds are cross-compiled and participants in the reproducible builds process are expected to use a x86_64 machine, so this isn't an issue.
16:55:45 <br-m> <tobtoht> It was possible to cross-compile from different architectures to a common target and get identical hashes using Guix before Rust was added.
17:01:00 <br-m> <tobtoht> One for monerod also exists in the main repo: https://github.com/monero-project/monero/blob/master/Dockerfile > <@vtnerd> Also I have a docker build that is stagex compliant here : https://github.com/monero-lws/containers
18:46:27 <selsta> .merge+ 11137 11136 11133 11132 11129 11128
18:46:27 <xmr-pr> Added
20:20:17 <br-m> <jpk68:matrix.org> #8754 can now be closed (superseded by #11136)
20:26:36 <tobtoht> .merges
20:26:36 <xmr-pr> 10820 10865 10872 10886 10887 10934 10964 11054 11074 11108 11121 11122 11123 11125 11128 11129 11132 11133 11136 11137
20:35:38 <tobtoht> .merges
20:35:39 <xmr-pr> 10820 10865 10872 10886 10887 10934 10964 11054 11074 11108 11121 11122 11123 11125