00:43:26 Sounds like a kde issue 00:46:23 I took a quick look yesterday and saw some similar reports of flatpaks on kde requiring workarounds to have an icon. Didnt read too much into it though 01:05:18 I would be great but not necessarily 11:32:53 According to my preliminary analysis, the share of non-spam txs using the 3rd fee tier (320 nanoneros per byte) increased from 4.5% on March 11 to 35.3% on March 12. So far, March 13 looks the same (35.6%). 11:35:37 I thought the fix was supposed to bump auto fees from the 1st tier to the 2nd. But the PR says it will bump to priority `2`, which is 3rd tier because it looks like it is indexed from 0. 11:36:32 Anyway, miners are probably happy. The first tier is 20 nanoneros per byte. Going to the 3rd tier raises fee per tx by 10x. 11:40:52 rucknium: it reduces the priority by 1 later in the code 11:41:01 1 = priority 0, 2 = priority 1 11:43:39 This is why I try to avoid reading wallet2.cpp directly :P 11:43:53 but i'm confused now 11:44:06 why did the third tier increase so much? 11:44:14 So PR 9220 might not have caused the change in the data I see 11:44:50 I don't know. Could be a service, another wallet implementation, etc 11:46:20 I'm also trying to code quickly and I haven't double checked everything. Could be a problem in my analysis code. 11:48:22 320 nXMR per byte is not one of the auto levels 11:48:34 Auto chooses between 20 and 80 12:09:44 sech1: Are you seeing the same thing in the fee data? I'm just doubting my numbers. It looks like mean fee about doubled on March 12: https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/monero-transactionfees.html#3m 13:07:57 If some users started using 80 instead of 20, it checks out 13:33:07 This block has 121 txs paying 320 nanoneros/byte according to my count: https://xmrchain.net/block/3103997 13:33:31 I think this could be a change in the spam behavior. 13:42:18 i just confirmed auto-fee setting the correct tier 13:42:36 jumps between first and second tier, around 4x difference 13:43:58 Thanks, selsta. Fee tiers by blocks today: https://paste.debian.net/hidden/cedfac12/ 13:44:59 i don't see why the spammer would use the third tier 13:45:05 It looks like spam behavior. 320 nanoneros/byte is high until block 3104043. That's why I was doubting my data: I didn't see a lot of these 320 fee txs in the very recent blocks. 13:45:55 Not necessarily a spammer, but someone who produces a lot of txs on chain and can switch fee tier at will. 13:46:15 Maybe Kraken or someone like that. 13:48:53 https://xmrchain.net/search?value=3103829 a block of 100% txs with 320+ fee. Total fees in block 0.146910 wow 13:49:34 It's those 1in/2out txs again, but at a higher fee. 13:51:54 if their goal is to create outputs to deanon it wouldn't make sense to pay 10x fees 13:53:13 Well, you can own an even higher share of outputs if your txs displace real user txs in a block. 14:27:12 Real txs get mined eventually so it doesn't matter in the long run 14:28:11 I saw a sudden increase of 320 nanonero/byte tx on March 7. The share of those txs was 13.5% on that day. I didn't know what it was. Now it looks related to what we are seeing yesterday and today. 14:32:36 recent blocks I'm seeing >90% min fee txs 14:33:37 just looked at full blocks, not all of them are currently full 14:34:26 The 320 fee volume stopped at block 3104043