16:19:01 <m-relay_> <j​pk68:matrix.org> Would someone mind submitting this to #4573?
16:19:02 <m-relay_> <j​pk68:matrix.org> https://paste.debian.net/plainh/b68d7733
16:54:41 <m-relay_> <j​pk68:matrix.org> Another small one: https://paste.debian.net/plainh/d4d596d7
17:52:14 <m-relay_> <j​pk68:matrix.org> selsta: Sorry for the ping, I was just wondering if you would be willing
17:52:38 <m-relay_> <j​pk68:matrix.org> or someone else you know of :)
17:54:20 <selsta> it would probably be best if someone takes over the whole PR since the person in 4573 doesn't want to continue anymore
17:54:45 <m-relay_> <j​pk68:matrix.org> I would, but unfortunately GitHub kind of hates me
17:54:51 <m-relay_> <j​pk68:matrix.org> and my account is still (falsely) suspended
17:55:45 <selsta> did you mean with submitting adding a comment with the patch links, or pasting the patches itself into a comment?
17:56:07 <m-relay_> <j​pk68:matrix.org> Anything works
17:57:49 <m-relay_> <j​pk68:matrix.org> The CI stuff is kind of beyond me, but I think I can make some decent progress on the rest of the PR
18:00:46 <selsta> CI stuff is just getting it to build on all OS
18:01:26 <m-relay_> <j​pk68:matrix.org> Yes, I know, I'm just not sure I'm super qualified to fix that
18:01:57 <selsta> added a comment
18:02:20 <m-relay_> <j​pk68:matrix.org> Thanks :)
18:58:15 <whatsayjose1980-> selsta if you want i can take over
18:59:08 <selsta> whatsayjose1980-: I misread the comment in 4573, seems they are still working on it just not interested in fixing CI at the moment
18:59:09 <m-relay_> <j​pk68:matrix.org> w​hatsayjose1980-: Are you the guy that submitted this PR yesterday?
18:59:11 <m-relay_> <j​pk68:matrix.org> https://github.com/monero-project/monero/pull/10370
18:59:46 <whatsayjose1980-> yes
19:00:12 <m-relay_> <j​pk68:matrix.org> Interesting...
19:00:13 <whatsayjose1980-> selsta ok
19:02:33 <whatsayjose1980-> m-relay_ interesting as in?
19:04:15 <m-relay_> <j​pk68:matrix.org> Uhh, it was an interesting PR
19:07:53 <whatsayjose1980-> m-relay_ as in?
19:08:09 <whatsayjose1980-> i am working on something for a private vested group
19:08:28 <whatsayjose1980-> large swathes of conversion
19:10:38 <whatsayjose1980-> without the essence mbweb yet private
19:29:15 <plowsof> ok
19:29:54 <whatsayjose1980-> @plowof sorry for bothering you yesterday mate
19:30:12 <plowsof> it was the highlight of my week, thank you
19:30:23 <whatsayjose1980-> plowsof :)
19:30:45 <whatsayjose1980-> but i didnt change anything tbh
19:30:55 <whatsayjose1980-> they were as they were
19:32:46 <whatsayjose1980-> thanks mate
19:32:53 <whatsayjose1980-> logging out now
19:33:14 <plowsof> nice to talk to you, have a wonderful evening 
19:33:26 <whatsayjose1980-> mine is half past night
19:33:51 <whatsayjose1980-> cheers mate enjoy tthe eve, night is young for you
21:05:51 <m-relay_> <j​pk68:matrix.org> A few more fixes: https://paste.debian.net/plainh/e6f39911
21:52:25 <m-relay_> <o​frnxmr:xmr.mx> Shared
21:52:48 <m-relay_> <j​pk68:matrix.org> There may be more coming ;)
22:06:36 <m-relay_> <o​frnxmr:xmr.mx> Finish and sell all at once?
22:07:07 <m-relay_> <j​pk68:matrix.org> Maybe, I guess
22:07:23 <m-relay_> <j​pk68:matrix.org> The problem is, if two people are working on it, the other person might do work I already finished
22:07:31 <m-relay_> <j​pk68:matrix.org> or vice versa
22:07:34 <m-relay_> <o​frnxmr:xmr.mx> I doubt the pr is going to be merged eith its 50+ commits not squashed
22:07:41 <m-relay_> <o​frnxmr:xmr.mx> So fix conflicts :P
22:08:01 <m-relay_> <j​pk68:matrix.org> Fair point, but still, it would waste time
22:08:17 <m-relay_> <j​pk68:matrix.org> This should have been done, like, yesterday
22:08:30 <m-relay_> <o​frnxmr:xmr.mx> The pr or the migration to qt6?
22:08:56 <m-relay_> <j​pk68:matrix.org> Qt6 migration. I don't mean to point fingers or anything
22:09:07 <m-relay_> <j​pk68:matrix.org> Qt5 was deprecated like a year ago
22:09:10 <m-relay_> <o​frnxmr:xmr.mx> I dont know anything about qt but is this pr even the right way to go about it?
22:09:14 <m-relay_> <o​frnxmr:xmr.mx> Seems rather messy
22:09:30 <m-relay_> <o​frnxmr:xmr.mx> Youd think this can be done a lot cleaner(?)
22:09:35 <m-relay_> <j​pk68:matrix.org> How else would you do it? The new Qt version is full of a huge number of breaking changes
22:09:39 <m-relay_> <j​pk68:matrix.org> How so?
22:09:44 <m-relay_> <o​frnxmr:xmr.mx> ^
22:10:05 <m-relay_> <o​frnxmr:xmr.mx> Twas a question
22:10:24 <m-relay_> <j​pk68:matrix.org> My bad :)
22:10:43 <m-relay_> <o​frnxmr:xmr.mx> I just see 144 files changes and think "this aint getting reviewed "
22:12:03 <plowsof> Make feather wallet look like the gui? :P
22:13:49 <m-relay_> <o​frnxmr:xmr.mx> And i see stuff like this and wonder "tf?"
22:13:50 <m-relay_> <o​frnxmr:xmr.mx> ```
22:13:52 <m-relay_> <o​frnxmr:xmr.mx>       run: DEV_MODE=ON make release -j3
22:13:54 <m-relay_> <o​frnxmr:xmr.mx>       run: DEV_MODE=ON make release -j"$(sysctl -n hw.ncpu)"
22:13:56 <m-relay_> <o​frnxmr:xmr.mx> ```
22:13:58 <m-relay_> <o​frnxmr:xmr.mx> A few lines lower
22:14:00 <m-relay_> <o​frnxmr:xmr.mx> ```
22:14:02 <m-relay_> <o​frnxmr:xmr.mx>       run: DEV_MODE=ON make release -j3 
22:14:04 <m-relay_> <o​frnxmr:xmr.mx>        run: y make release -j"$(nproc)"
22:14:06 <m-relay_> <o​frnxmr:xmr.mx> ```
22:14:08 <m-relay_> <o​frnxmr:xmr.mx> Like why inconsist
22:14:10 <m-relay_> <o​frnxmr:xmr.mx> Ent
22:14:28 <m-relay_> <j​pk68:matrix.org> Yeah, not sure
22:14:30 <m-relay_> <o​frnxmr:xmr.mx> And       `run: y make release -j"$(nproc)"` is a typo?
22:14:32 <m-relay_> <j​pk68:matrix.org> https://matrix.monero.social/_matrix/media/v1/download/matrix.org/zUlMvHQzzcUfgjCIfXprPKGO
22:14:42 <m-relay_> <j​pk68:matrix.org> Left is Qt6, right is current release
22:14:52 <m-relay_> <j​pk68:matrix.org> Still some work to do with shadows and stuff
22:15:08 <m-relay_> <j​pk68:matrix.org> and the whole balance card thing is just not there (?)
22:15:50 <m-relay_> <o​frnxmr:xmr.mx> #startfresh
22:15:56 <m-relay_> <j​pk68:matrix.org> We might be in for a slight unintentional redesign :)
22:17:08 <m-relay_> <o​frnxmr:xmr.mx> The CI changes dont seem to all be coherent
22:17:35 <m-relay_> <j​pk68:matrix.org> OP did say that they couldn't really fix it
22:17:37 <m-relay_> <j​pk68:matrix.org> https://github.com/monero-project/monero-gui/pull/4573#issuecomment-4081857258
22:17:42 <m-relay_> <o​frnxmr:xmr.mx> So i guess my question is mainly, is the rest of the pr somethimg we shoukd be buikding off of?
22:18:10 <m-relay_> <o​frnxmr:xmr.mx> The ci isnt juat annoying to fix, it looks like it was broken
22:18:27 <m-relay_> <o​frnxmr:xmr.mx> Revert all changes to it, and do it properly :D
22:19:08 <m-relay_> <j​pk68:matrix.org> I guess I can always rebase to my fork on Codeberg, and then submit from there or something
22:19:15 <m-relay_> <o​frnxmr:xmr.mx> A couple sane changes a bunch lf random unnecessary ones dont inspire confidence for the rest of the pr
22:19:39 <m-relay_> <o​frnxmr:xmr.mx> Its easy for ie me to clobe for codeberg fork and pish the branch to my github
22:19:53 <m-relay_> <j​pk68:matrix.org> Might be rude to take credit for it though, since I will have done maybe 10 out of the 54 commits
22:19:57 <m-relay_> <j​pk68:matrix.org> Thanks :)
22:21:27 <plowsof> Still(wondering): what llm does those commit titles 
22:22:28 <plowsof> OP said they cant be bothered to fix it right now, but their git  is hidden so i cant see their work 
22:39:56 <m-relay_> <j​pk68:matrix.org> plowsof: Not everything is vibecoded... maybe some of us are just NPCs :)
22:42:44 <m-relay_> <j​pk68:matrix.org> ofrnxmr Got another one for you
22:42:45 <m-relay_> <j​pk68:matrix.org> https://paste.debian.net/plainh/858d7974
23:06:22 <selsta> I would ideally like Qt 5 and 6 support simultaneously but not sure if that's possible