01:07:17 what are these effort percentagges? 01:18:08 I'm not looking at it right now, but isn't effort based on how many hashes it took or is taking to find a block against the predicted amount of hashes? 01:19:14 Like a block found at 50% effort is "lucky" and one at 150% is "unlucky". 01:19:50 ah. my effort stats are in the thousand% range. so, tough luck... 01:25:36 This is what I enjoy about you, hyc. You and your Android miners do it just for the pure enjoyment. 01:28:49 it's a different form of video game ;) 01:34:44 What are you using to mine on Android? I was going to build xmrig on Termux, but the main repo on Termux was down last I checked so I couldn't install any packages. 01:35:07 huh, I built on termux just a few days ago 01:35:33 was the repo down? I just thought my install was out of date 01:36:11 403 Forbidden 01:36:11 Err:5 https://dl.bintray.com/grimler/science-packages-24 science Release 01:36:11 403 Forbidden 01:36:11 Err:6 https://main.termux-mirror.ml stable Release 01:36:11 Redirection from https to 'http://ww38.main.termux-mirror.ml/dists/stable/Release' is forbidden 01:36:36 Possible cause: repository is under maintenance or down (wrong sources.list URL?). 01:36:36 E: The repository 'https://main.termux-mirror.ml stable Release' does not have a Release file. 01:38:14 Sorry I didn't realize there were so many line breaks. 01:38:29 When I do 'pkg update' 01:43:07 nioc, thats the nature of using a sidechain of limited depth to record shares for blockreward distribution 01:43:41 thx, imma sure it was done for good reason 01:43:58 otherwise, you'd have a sidechain that grows indefinitely... 01:44:04 just pps or similar would be nice 01:44:44 although.... perhaps you could smoosh in something like cryptonite (the coin) did, with the blockchain that gets dumped into an account type storage thing 01:45:04 account-based tracking, interesting idea 01:45:04 those consensus rules would get wackadoodle real quick i imagine 01:45:37 it may not be worth the trouble 01:45:47 yeah 01:45:56 perhaps. but if i keep on getting all this dust i might go back to playing the lottery 01:46:49 if the sidechain is already at 15MH and you only have 1kH you're going to get effectively 0% of the payout anyway, even if all your shares are tracked 01:47:08 well, then the p2pool becomes a sort of xmr savings account 01:47:15 well, storing hashes really 01:47:33 well, the p2pool-with-account-based-tracking, which we'll call p2poolX 01:47:50 no... needs something with more pizazz 01:48:12 p2poolz 01:48:15 or whatever it is you call it when u name a thing with no real meaning. 01:48:20 I still don’t understand how the p2pool works. Is there an explanation anywhere? 01:48:22 like p2pool-Miami 01:48:30 Yeah I can confirm that 1.5 kH/s has netted exactly 0 XMR lol. 01:48:50 garth, yeah it exists in the bitcointalk forums i know, because thats where i read about it i think 01:49:00 the first concept to grok is merge-mining 01:49:14 thats like the keystone of the whole architecture 01:49:16 “ it's a different form of video game ;)” Love this response 01:49:30 I understand merge mining easily 01:51:00 I love Namecoin for this exact reason. Only coin Satoshi helped begin besides Bitcoin. Interestingly during the BTC BCH split there was a short period where the Namecoin merge mined hashrate was higher than bitcoins. Ha it was the most secure chain in the world 01:51:12 hrm. okay, so your merge-mining monero and the p2pool sidechain. The block you are trying to find the solution to is a monero block that has its coinbase reward spit out to those that are mining on the p2pool sidechain 01:51:38 with those splits proportional to the number of blocks each miner has found on the sidechain 01:52:18 That's actually pretty clear. Good explanation. 01:52:26 danke 01:52:36 I’m going to have to read that explanation a few times. Thanks gingeropolous 01:52:45 bitte 01:52:49 I'll take payment channels for 500 01:53:30 Ginger I created my first wallet in 2016 off a YouTube video you made. I remember laughing because you liked the mnemonic seed in the video because it had the word bacon in it 01:53:39 lol 01:54:19 i've actually not used wallets that i generated because the seeds gave me bad juju 01:54:55 heh, could probably reduce the search space of the bajillions of seeds by filtering out creepy ones 01:55:09 Out of everybody still mining today I bet you’re one of the people who’s been doing it the longest 01:55:29 its the best/worst addiction 01:55:32 Man mining when you started must have been amazing to look back on now 01:56:16 amazing how the old ways of the west are still applicable 01:56:39 meanwhile I'm typing the seed: bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon... Into the GUI to see if gingeropolous left some treasure. 01:56:46 Do you have a spouse or partner? Do you ever try to explain to them how you’re running up the power bill because you’re obsessed with collecting these random strings? Do they “get” it? 01:57:10 after so many years they get it 01:57:18 Ha awesome 01:57:55 im debating if i should build up with ddr4 or wait for ddr5 01:58:06 oh wow, I actually got a payout today. just refreshed wallet 01:58:16 Nice I should check too 01:58:26 Me and my 3 shares 01:58:29 call be double-o-1 01:59:27 damn, we're gonna click over to 1.8 before yah know it: already_generated_coins = 17984860994613390941 02:00:46 i wonder how that 0.6 is gonna do 02:02:08 I guess I don’t understand how this is trustless. If I find a block solution via my miner, how does an adversary not just submit it to the daemon as a solo miner and collect the block reward and then submit all their non winning shares to the p2pool to double dip? 02:02:35 because the nonce + (block stuff) = solution 02:02:43 Right 02:02:43 if you change the block stuff, you didn't find the solution 02:03:36 but as some point the nature of bitcoins asic chain will have lotsa chains wanting to merge mine 02:04:09 I still don’t get it haha :) 02:04:24 We need an article to be written about this 02:06:51 Man mainnet is really being used a lot. Transactions all day long. I’m so happy to see that. 02:08:59 But we really got to bump up the required ringsize 02:10:58 gingeropolous: tail emission is May 2022 02:11:01 garth are you familiar with the idea of a trap door function? Like MD5 or SHA256, etc? It's called that because it only goes one way. Hashing is a form of trap door function where the two pieces are the block solution you find and the nonce. You change either of those thing even a little, it's no longer the same and therefore invalid. You can't change the block to pay you only because it wouldn't be the same anymore. 02:11:36 might be a year b4 DDR5 outperforms DDR4 02:12:29 wild guess based on past 02:13:44 Yes I am aware of how a SHA256 Hash only goes one way 02:16:14 My point is if the p2pool is feeding the same mempool as the daemon to xmrig, and XMRig is just creating the same hashes solo mining or p2pool mining, then why wouldn’t an adversary double dip? 02:16:23 I don’t understand how this is trustless 02:16:42 the payout address is part of the hash 02:16:56 you can't change it and keep the solution 02:17:46 Yeah that's what I'm trying to say. The block solution you are computing those hashes for includes everyone else in the coinbase so you can't just change it. 02:30:57 So maybe dumb question. If the overall hashrate of p2pool goes up such that we're finding blocks much more often, it's more likely that low hashrate miners will get a payout before their "lucky" shares fall out of the PPLNS window right? 02:32:35 maybe, but the size of your payout shrinks 02:33:45 this doesn't make mining easier for low hashrate miners. or for anyone else. 02:34:22 it only makes it so that with your 1 in 1 million chance, you actually get paid once every million times 02:35:09 No, but it does mean that you don't have to trust a pool operator to pay you 6 months from now when you hit a threshold. 02:35:16 true 02:36:17 Although, it's all the same over time right. Statistically, a low hashrate miner over enough time would have the same income using centralized mining vs p2pool. 02:36:28 right 02:36:28 ? 02:36:51 "long enough time" being the tricky part 02:37:36 So I'd rather wait to be lucky than trust someone I guess. Either way I don't have a payout immediately, but one I know that I'm not getting stiffed. 02:37:36 it just spreads out the curve; the area under the curve doesn't change. 02:38:28 absolutely, this is why cryptocurrency exists - to build systems that don't require trusting someone else 02:39:24 Exactly that's why I'm so excited for p2pool and why RandomX is amazing. 02:39:38 sigh. my trusty geekbox must've gotten partly fried by a power surge or something. neither USB port works any more 02:39:48 I've been running monerod on it since 2016 02:40:13 and it's about time I replace its microSD card. 128GB card is now 91% full 02:40:20 I can't believe you invented that based on a suggestion in a Reddit thread or am I mistaken? 02:40:48 I had been thinking about it and then dismissed it as pointless. but then that reddit thread showed up with a similar idea 02:40:57 and that was enough motivation to pursue it further 02:41:48 That SD card has to be on it's last legs. 02:42:12 this was that reddit thread https://www.reddit.com/r/Monero/comments/84y3ci/help_new_funky_pow_idea_against_asics_and_for_the/ 02:42:50 I've had microsd die with 1 year of light use just with reads (when I used to carry a lot of media with me before mobile networks could stream well). 02:43:22 yeah frankly i'm surprised it has lasted this long. I've had others die after only 2-3 years in my phones 02:44:55 you can see from my replies on that reddit thread, 3 weeks after the post went up I had a working proof of concept written 02:45:05 fun times... 02:45:23 Yeah and RandomX is amazing engineering and keeps us ASIC resistant. I don't understand why more cryptocurrencies don't embrace something like it. Having all your hashrate in China is dangerous. (Although, I haven't seen how BTC is fairing after the recent ban.) 02:46:00 Yeah the three week thing is one of the things I remembered. 02:46:04 Mad man. 02:47:39 my original idea was just to use gcc itself as the PoW. it's part of the old SPEC benchmark suites already 02:48:22 obviously the concept had to be refined in a lot of ways to get to where we are 02:48:39 The first prototype used JavaScript right? 02:48:47 yeah 02:49:07 Lol. I'm glad the news sites didn't misreport that. 02:49:19 in what way? 02:49:48 "Monero includes JavaScript in it's hashing algorithm, how secure is it?" 02:50:01 People are dumb. 02:50:05 heh 02:50:32 the idea was unsecurable, unfortunately 02:53:15 JavaScript does weirdness with type conversion with unary operations and addition. It's the devil. 02:59:02 Although, it's all the same over time right. Statistically, a low hashrate miner over enough time would have the same income using centralized mining vs p2pool. >>> though this is only true if the network is decentralized. if the network is centralized around large pools directly connected to each other, a solo miners block is likely to be orphaned 03:09:57 another case where statistics meats the brutal meathooks of reality 03:10:06 Although I wasn't talking about solo mining, I'm not sure I follow. If I solo mine a block and submit it to the network how can it be orphaned by miners colluding? They all agree to only accept blocks from the other bad guys? Wouldn't they need specifically modified malicious nodes to do so? 03:10:54 yeah, just like how bitcoin miners needed a specially modified node / stratum server to mine spv-blocks? 03:12:25 miners are greedy by definition. thats sorta how nakamoto consensus works. the greed can be out of check though, hence asics. 03:12:44 I was just talking about pool vs p2pool. Statistically over time should have similar income because essentially they're doing the same kind of PPLNS scheme, just one is paying me immediately. 03:12:54 yeah 03:14:53 But yeah. I do have a basic understanding of the fact miners are greedy, but I think that many know not to bite the hand that feeds them. i.e. yes you can mine in a malicious and non-collaborative way 03:15:10 but it's at the expense of your coins reputation and value 03:16:03 indeed. 03:16:30 and yet, no monero pools have raised their fees 03:16:58 I'm not sure you're being facetious or not, have they not? 03:19:16 I mean mining pools can co-exist with p2pool if they provide value. They can stratum proxy to p2pool even and still track users shares to pay them. Many people will enjoy the simplicity of setup and worker tracking and graphs etc. 03:19:37 So they're not being put out of business per se. 03:30:16 my point is that the mining ecosystem dominated by 2-3 major pools is not an ideal situation, yet none of those pools have raised fees, which would drive miners to smaller, lower fee pools 03:31:15 its not malicious nor is it non-collaborative, but its not.... great either 03:31:27 but regardless, we have p2pool now. 03:31:32 Ah. I follow. 03:31:37 time for parades 03:32:16 But does p2pool solve it? What if people prefer pool mining and the big pools don't go away? 03:32:29 but yah know, no one gives a rats ass about decentralization these days anyhoo 03:33:17 naw, it doesn't solve it 03:33:59 heh. though it would be interesting if p2pool somehow makes the whole wowner-style forced solomining somehow poolable 03:34:09 wowner. wownero-style 03:34:10 A lot of people do. I do. Atomic swaps, p2pool, and ASIC resistance are the triple threat, the killer feature. I feel like I'm taking crazy pills when I talk to people. 03:34:26 *care about decentralization 03:34:44 i know we do. but i feel like we're crazy 03:35:40 Bitcoin maximalists praising acceptance into traditional centralized spaces... Madness. 03:38:09 the payout address is part of the hash. Ahhh on that helps 03:38:21 *ok that helps 03:38:33 We arent going to replace centralized finance ever, USD and banks will always exist, but Monero will still be a free and decentralized option. 03:39:20 How does the hash work if the payout address has 1000 people on the p2pool? Does hashing take longer since it has to include all this data? 03:41:26 It makes the transaction slightly larger on the blockchain, but I don't know how computationally expensive it is to generate the block template with the extra coinbase outputs or to hash it. 03:46:03 But, gingeropolous, my question is, do you think the majority of miners will switch to p2pool once it's live or will there still be some large pools? Bitcoin p2pool exists and it's not a substantial part of their hashrate. 03:48:18 Ah, I reread what you said about it not solving it. 07:39:07 Morning, I have migrated 2 of my machines from xmrvsbeast over to P2Pool. All set up fine on Ubuntu and happily finding shares. Ran a pull this morning for the latest version and all seems happy 07:58:59 Welcome! 10:32:41 Any idea why "Your hashrate (pool-side)" would be 0 H/s even though StratumServer is reporting a few good KH/s? 10:46:04 you need to find a pool share 10:51:21 I presume that happens in time? 10:52:57 it depends on your hashrate 10:53:34 difficulty is 227M now, so more than a day with low 2 kh/s hashrate 10:54:35 Ah right, that's fine. I was more concerned that something wasn't setup right. 10:58:05 if StratumServer shows more or less correct hashrate, it's fine 10:58:44 It does, thanks :) 11:10:52 this keeps my network port pretty busy, the light on my switch constantly flickering with traffic 11:16:31 it's probably monerod traffic 11:17:47 this is my node: https://paste.debian.net/hidden/cadb3729/ 11:57:21 Is there any way to see the pool stats? When P2Pool last found a block etc? I can see the SideChain status as 11:57:22 Main chain height = 2440534 11:57:22 Main chain hashrate = 2.648 GH/s 11:57:22 Side chain height = 1339 11:57:22 Side chain hashrate = 10.000 KH/s 11:57:22 Your hashrate (pool-side) = 9.999 KH/s 11:57:22 PPLNS window = 1339 blocks (+0 uncles, 0 orphans) 11:57:23 Your shares = 1339 blocks (+0 uncles, 0 orphans) 11:57:23 Block reward share (est) = 0.880915690211 XMR 11:57:56 Wow nice work mandelbug 12:02:42 About a whole block reward for just over half the sharechain blocks ? 12:03:03 Oh wait. The share chain is clipped... 12:03:11 You're on your own maybe ? 12:06:17 maybe, still trying to work it all out, the rest of my status reads as. 12:06:18 StratumServer status 12:06:18 Hashrate (15m est) = 5.993 KH/s 12:06:18 Hashrate (1h est) = 6.250 KH/s 12:06:18 Hashrate (24h est) = 7.799 KH/s 12:06:18 Total hashes = 137132153 12:06:18 Shares found = 1371 12:06:19 Average effort = 100.001% 12:06:19 Current effort = 0.000% 12:06:20 Connections = 1 (1 incoming) 12:06:20 P2PServer status 12:06:21 Connections = 0 (0 incoming) 12:06:21 Peer list size = 0 12:06:22 I am guessing that the Uncles refers to found blocks which would then result in a payout? 12:07:44 Uncles is weird creepy terminology for close orphans, which are close enough that they're paid for at a discount. 12:08:01 Anyway, you're not on the main share chain. You're mining on your own. 12:08:09 Ahhh OK 12:08:32 You're probably on the main monero chain though, so if you find a block you'll have it all to yourself 12:09:34 How do I get on to the main share chain? I have the addpeers 65.21.227.114 option added to the p2pool command 12:10:34 Recompile the new version and make sure your config.json has the new pool name. 12:10:41 mandelbug https://p2pool.io/ 12:13:33 what's your exact command line? 12:14:53 ./p2pool --host 127.0.0.1 --rpc-port 18081 --zmq-port 18083 --wallet <

> --stratum 0.0.0.0:3333 --p2p 0.0.0.0:37890 --addpeers 65.21.227.114:37890 12:15:43 37889 12:15:44 Config.json reads as 12:15:45 "name": "mainnet test 2", 12:15:45 "password": "", 12:15:45 "block_time": 10, 12:15:45 "min_diff": 100000, 12:15:45 "pplns_window": 2160, 12:15:45 "uncle_penalty": 20 12:16:07 change 37890 to 37889 12:16:33 in both places in your command line 12:17:00 Thank you, 12:17:11 I copied it from the readme yesterday 12:17:31 it's syncing now 12:17:44 hey! Will the p2pool api support reading how many shares have been submited by users connected to p2pool instance? 12:22:45 no 12:22:52 I'm going to assume that ERROR 2021-09-02 11:28:38.5132 RandomX_Hasher couldn't allocate RandomX VM is just a limitation on the VPS I'm using? 12:23:10 https://p2pool.io/api/pool/stats has "totalHashes" though 12:24:20 You need VPS with 4 GB memory preferable. Or you could try to add "--light-mode" to p2pool command line 12:25:26 has 8GB 12:27:11 did you enable huge pages there? 12:28:15 used the command on the github page 12:28:37 sudo sysctl vm.nr_hugepages=3072 12:28:40 that command? 12:28:44 am only running p2pool and monerod on the vps 12:28:46 yes 12:29:09 you could get to that error only if you don't have enough huge pages 12:29:16 try to increase this number to 4096 maybe 12:29:23 ok 12:31:28 you could also run "cat /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages" to check that it actually worked 12:38:24 looks like it didn't take it when I first did it, reboot and try again seems to be fine now with the original 3072 12:46:51 sech1: A few errors in my log file after 12 hours of pool use: https://paste.debian.net/1210072 12:47:46 Maybe this is caused by monerod just falling behind temporarily? 12:49:42 yes 12:49:47 Woooo got my first few outputs into my wallet! Total revenue from 12 hours of mining at 25 kh is 0.00242 13:07:20 Is that with default difficulty Garth? or did you set a custom diff? 13:43:10 Default diff 13:43:14 I don’t think setting diff affects earnings 13:52:31 heh. these direct from coinbase p2pool payouts will skew the whole "we shouldn't use coinbase outputs as mixins" thing 13:54:43 but i was able to send p2pool payouts using cakewallet. those are with the recently updated p2pool 13:55:14 dev fund is getting my sweet $3 14:19:07 When was your cakewallet updated? Did it see all your payouts? 14:24:10 So, does moving these somewhat unique coinbase outputs reduce privacy somehow overall? 14:41:29 gingeropolous both cake wallet and monerujo don't see my p2pool payouts, they need an update 14:50:48 ok so not the only one that cake wallet doesn't see my payout 14:51:19 couldn't get my cake wallet app to accept any new nodes either 14:57:07 only CLI wallet v0.17.2.3 can see them 15:03:38 welp, it worked for me 15:03:42 sech1, ^ 15:04:51 i have cakewallet 4.2.5 apparently 15:06:23 QuickBASIC, re: coinbase and privacy - perhaps. there used to be a big thing, sgp_ can speak to it, about how including coinbase outputs as decoys was kind of a waste of a decoy, because the only people that control coinbase outputs are miners, and there are only a few true miners on the network, because pools suck balls 15:07:08 one idea floated was that someone spending a coinbase tx should only mix with other coinbases as decoys 15:07:46 more or less, the concern sorta has just been backburnered for lack of a good solution or i dunno really 15:11:00 Was backburnered because coinbase outputs are a minority of outputs now 15:14:57 My stratum server stats are weird 15:15:03 ashrate (15m est) = 0 H/s 15:15:03 Hashrate (1h est) = 0 H/s 15:15:05 Hashrate (24h est) = 3.101 KH/s 15:15:34 I know I'm getting jobs on the miners, but this always says 0 for 15m and 1h 15:17:51 QBASIC, yeah its because they are not finding shares 15:17:56 i had similar thing occur 15:18:06 i dunno if the stratum eventually lowered the diff or what 15:25:09 My diff is showing up as 306M on my miners, not finding anything, was going to leave it to see if anything would happen with lowering the diff etc 15:25:39 Okay, but why is the 24h so high... Oh b/c I have found some shares in that larger window? 15:25:56 yeah, and they were high diff shares i bet 15:26:07 gingeropolous I also tested cakewallet 4.2.5. There's a small chance that your wallets ended up first in the list for each payout 15:26:10 yeah, my miners are receiving 305M diff jobs 15:27:30 mandelbug you can set custom diff on your miners 15:27:53 but i guess thats the current diff of sidechain? 15:28:01 Oh that's the same reason block explorers are showing only one coinbase? 15:28:31 hrm, may need to ping mwO12 15:29:11 github instructions have the command line to set custom diff 15:29:15 ./xmrig -u x+10000 -o 127.0.0.1:3333 for diff 10000 15:30:10 right, but why does the diff get set so high? 15:30:25 because it's sidechain diff 15:30:37 either that or you set custom diff manually 15:37:00 roight roight 16:16:22 Does v0.17.2.3 support p2pool natively now, or still need custom binaries? 16:19:07 you still need custom binaries 16:19:26 p2pool changes were too large to get included quickly 16:20:45 0.17.2.3 only has wallet fix for p2pool 16:43:31 any bug fixes/major changes since yesterday? need to recompile p2pool? 16:46:54 No 17:05:04 thank you sech1, I will leave it running for a bit and see if anything pops up, if not will try and set a difficulty 17:16:12 "you still need custom binaries" <- Thanks! 17:16:22 Will be testing this week, have the custom daemon syncing now. 17:22:53 My kid added his gaming pc to my stratum. I'm going to have to raise his allowance. 17:23:14 By 0.00035 xmr lol. 17:31:57 lol 18:29:00 Is it necessary to be connected to the p2pserver? 18:29:33 No. 18:29:53 In theory anyway. If you do not, you'll be on your own. You get fewer blocks, but the whole block. 18:34:00 Interesting, if I didn't forward a port for the p2pserver, I was being told my monerod was out of sync. 18:40:04 2021-09-02 18:39:03.8680 StratumServer sent new job to 5/5 clients 18:40:13 I only have 3 miners... I wonder why this would happen? 18:40:28 It's NAT'd and port isn't open in firewall. 18:40:35 Connecting via local subnet. 18:41:23 Once of the miners is using a Windows Scheduled Task and stopping and starting xmrig when idle, so it's possible that it's connected and disconnected several times. I wonder if it's counting those multiple times. 18:42:22 Any way to list miners that are connected via stratum? 18:44:25 Off topic is there a way to login to IRC with the same nick from multiple clients. I'm jumping between my work machine, phone, and laptop. 18:48:22 Yes, though not at the same time. You can also use a bouncer to multiplex your clients. Like znc. 18:50:24 Okay, thanks moo. 18:54:23 So, it seems like p2pool is not getting info from monerod :( 18:55:07 Although monerod is up to date, p2pool thinks I'm behind 18:56:34 1) monerod must be custom build from my branch 2) ./monerod --zmq-pub tcp://127.0.0.1:18083 18:58:06 I think I have all of those things 18:58:12 * those things covered 18:59:33 how many blocks behind? 19:00:37 sech1 any plan to add a way to list connected workers? 19:01:26 list how? IP addresses? 19:01:38 It pulls the right data from monerod when it initialises, but it doesn't update, so as blocks are found it increases how far behind I am 19:02:09 it sounds like zmq doesn't work 19:02:33 what version does monerod show at startup? Monero 'Oxygen Orion' (v0.17.2.3-1c9c3b770)? 19:03:41 Exactly 19:05:06 I am running p2pool and monerod from different accounts, I'm not sure that should matter though :S 19:05:17 if it's correct version, it should work. Do you run monerod and p2pool on the same machine? 19:05:40 Same machine, different users 19:06:26 list how? IP addresses? 19:06:26 At the bare minimum so if I'm like hyc and have a shelf full of cell phones mining I can tell which one is disconnected 19:06:44 I get 'failed to check for nmap support' on the restricted account 19:07:02 Or more seriously yeah to tell which miners are connected without checking each one. 19:08:00 "lsof -p PID | grep TCP" and look for something like "localhost.localdomain:58364->localhost.localdomain:18083 (ESTABLISHED)" in the output 19:08:10 where PID is PID of p2pool 21:07:10 Ah ty. 21:37:47 Another few errors in my p2pool: https://paste.debian.net/1210160 21:38:00 Well, warnings 21:39:30 “Banned for 600 seconds”, is that like Gone in 60 Seconds with Nicholas Cage? 21:43:52 And blonde Angelina Jolie. Blonde Angelina Jolie is the best Angelina Jolie