04:26:20 <gingeropolous> my hr doesn't seem as great as when i was pre v1.2
04:28:22 <nioc> How much of a difference?  Mine is at least as good
04:29:43 <nioc> Did you try turning the comp off and on again?
04:30:16 <nioc> Actually helped me a small amount after updating 
04:36:51 <crypto_grampy[m]> <gingeropolous> "my hr doesn't seem as great as..." <- Same
06:44:00 <mightysnowman[m]> what is comp
06:44:09 <mightysnowman[m]> I have simlar issue
06:59:20 <abberant[m]> <mightysnowman[m]> "what is comp" <- computer 
06:59:31 <mightysnowman[m]> oh okay
06:59:39 <mightysnowman[m]> why noone says pc instead, shorter
07:00:17 <abberant[m]> cause its not always a personal computer, I suppose a server or mining rig wouldnt fall under that category 
07:00:21 <abberant[m]> otherwise youre right
08:55:32 <\x> hyc: that turris omnia is way overkill damn
08:55:53 <\x> I wonder if its the time to actually get 1GbE software NAT on arm
08:58:03 <\x> also yeah both qualcomm and mediatek's next gen WiSoCs will have arm64 on them
08:59:54 <\x> their current wisocs are ipq4019 (4x 717MHz A7) and mt7621a, 2c/4t mips
12:22:58 <hyc> I've got 1 Gbit fibre connected to my house. can't imagine it will upgrade to 2.5Gbit any time soon though. so yeah my current 1Gbit turris omnia router is good enough
12:24:48 <pauliouk> I remember the day when I first got 512kbit cable, thinking I'd never need anything more than this, I was able to listen to mp3's as they downloaded...
12:32:01 <hyc> I remember 56k modems advertising video conferencing support. wtf, video at 56k?
12:32:22 <hyc> hm. I had no payouts since Oct 11. just got 2 today tho.
12:40:01 <pauliouk> I'd have expected you to have more hashrate hyc... got to be some old tech laying around you can set away mining
12:40:30 <pauliouk> I'm getting around 0.15XMR per month at the moment
12:40:32 <hyc> i took a couple tvboxes offline cause I was investigating firmware upgrades
12:41:13 <pauliouk> I wish I could rely on the idea of purchasing another similar rig would mean I'd double my monthly income mining, but heh most likely not the case
12:41:48 <hyc> I'm considering guying a new macbook pro and selling my current one
12:41:55 <hyc> s/guying/buying
12:42:23 <hyc> curious to see if the new chips have as many errors as the old one
12:43:09 <\x> hyc: issue currently is gigabit sw nat
12:43:27 <\x> hwnat no issues, lots of openwrt-able devices can do that
12:43:56 <\x> software nat perf sucks on most arm/mips socs, so you really cant do gigabit sqm
12:44:12 <hyc> yeah. I see a lot of discussion of that
12:44:35 <hyc> probably not relevant to majority of SOHO users
12:44:42 <\x> I think the theres some chinese soc integrators that did it, but sw nat performance still only like 600 Mbit
12:44:51 <\x> tried to do it*
12:44:56 <hyc> my fibre service is pppoe, never see pppd eating any CPU
12:46:17 <\x> i think this one is the fastest you can get currently with arm
12:46:18 <\x> https://forum.openwrt.org/t/nanopi-r2s-is-a-great-openwrt-device/65374
12:46:26 <\x> 4 core Rockchip SOC (RK3328)
12:46:35 <\x> >SQM enabled ingress up to 465 Mbps, egress up to 750 Mbps
12:47:59 <\x> I also heard last time that theres some push to port OPNSense to these devices
12:48:12 <\x> that pfsense fork
12:49:02 <pauliouk> so there's crypto that's PoW, crypto thats PoS, crypto thats mined by having lots of HDD space, is there a crypto that is mined with bandwidth yet? :P
12:49:32 <hyc> probably ;)
12:50:02 <hyc> hmm. proof of bandwidth - sending tons of traffic, making the network unusable for anyone else. sounds lovely.
12:50:17 <hyc> aka DDoS
12:50:37 <sudo_ki[m]> Hey all, are there any known issues with 1.2?
12:50:39 <\x> that turris omnia 2022 though, i wonder about that 16GB ram option
12:50:43 <pauliouk> Distributed Mining Service more like :)
12:50:46 <\x> like why 16GB
12:53:08 <hyc> why not 16GB? it would make a great home server
12:53:17 <\x> well yeah
12:53:19 <hyc> RAM for fileserver caching, etc
12:53:25 <\x> seeing that you can lxc/docker on these too
12:53:33 <\x> thats a nice reason for it
12:53:46 <\x> maybe im just salty that my router only has 512MB :p
12:53:58 <hyc> I've got a pair of 4TB SSDs in my rockpro64 being served over NFS
12:54:12 <hyc> would do something similar with that router
12:54:18 <\x> though the only extra thing i run on it is bw monitoring and unbound in recursive mode
12:55:00 <\x> oh, like as a NAS? you dont need 16GB for it, but yeah if you want to run monerod and maybe other things, it would be handy
12:55:18 <hyc> yep
12:55:45 <\x> i currently run this on mine
12:55:46 <\x> https://i.imgur.com/qWnRwsX.jpg
12:55:47 <hyc> and yeah, could leave 2 cpu cores mining
12:55:52 <\x> https://i.imgur.com/yYb2RqB.jpg
12:56:00 <\x> https://i.imgur.com/swgv2zc.jpeg
12:56:29 <hyc> what box is that?
12:56:34 <\x> R619AC
12:56:41 <\x> G-DOCK 2.0
12:56:53 <\x> https://www.acwifi.net/8547.html
12:56:55 <\x> hyc ^^
12:57:05 <hyc> a lot of empty space in that case
12:57:09 <\x> yup
12:57:14 <\x> a lot of room for modding
12:57:19 <\x> free mini pcie slot
12:57:31 <\x> https://i.imgur.com/vLpcrCN.jpg
12:57:43 <\x> fucked up the bootloader on my first try
12:57:49 <hyc> my turris omnia came with two upper shells for the case, one competely enclosed and one with slots exposed
12:58:31 <\x> https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/3691
12:59:01 <\x> hyc: this is something though
12:59:02 <\x> https://imgur.com/a/OY958ZP
12:59:15 <\x> funny how the cpu responds to overclocking, it scales so well
12:59:45 <\x> though yeah this is traffic from eth to internal cpu as iperf server is running on the router itself
13:03:08 <DataHoarder> > <sudo_ki[m]> Hey all, are there any known issues with 1.2?
13:03:11 <DataHoarder> not that I know of
13:04:42 <hyc> haven't seen any issues here either. just stopped running 1.1, started 1.2, went on same as before
13:05:32 <DataHoarder> in fact, 1.2 fixes a few issues on 1.1 :)
13:12:50 <sudo_ki[m]> I must just be unlucky in that case, thanks for the replies :) 
13:18:08 <pauliouk> luck is a hard thing to come by ;)
17:49:05 * shadowfax-87[m] posted a file: (16KiB) < https://libera.ems.host/_matrix/media/r0/download/matrix.org/PODonmhgqvYmvAqnsAWnqjOv/monerod.log >
17:49:32 <shadowfax-87[m]> After completely syncing the monero blockchain yesterday I'm having trouble connecting to the monero daemon after I reboot the ubuntu server 20.04 in which the monerod and the p2pool binaries are running. If I run the monerod status command a error messaging saying that I cannot connect to the daemon at 127.0.0.1:18081 appears. Can anyone help? Above I attached my monerod log file.
17:53:57 <selsta> is monerod running?
17:59:33 <shadowfax-87[m]> <selsta> "is monerod running?" <- Apparently yes I have check with htop. 
17:59:55 <selsta> is it in restricted mode?
18:00:02 <selsta> ok no, status should work in restricted no
18:00:21 <shadowfax-87[m]> I am running the monerod as a systemctl service.
18:01:05 <selsta> try stopping it and then start monerod from command line
18:01:09 <selsta> to see if any errors show up
18:02:04 <sethsimmons> Are you sure port 18081 is the RPC port in your config?
18:02:08 <DataHoarder> Also check you use ZMQ, otherwise might be an issue with firewall/user separation 
18:03:12 <sethsimmons> Looks like you have unrestricted at `127.0.0.1:18081` and restricted at `0.0.0.0:18089`
18:05:25 <shadowfax-87[m]> sethsimmons: Yes I have follow your guide and use the suggested configuration files. Anyway congrats for you job!
18:12:47 <sethsimmons> <shadowfax-87[m]> "Yes I have follow your guide and..." <- Does `curl http://127.0.0.1:18089/get_info` and/or `curl http://127.0.0.1:18081/get_info` work?
18:13:21 <shadowfax-87[m]> sethsimmons: One minute I will try it.
18:16:16 <shadowfax-87[m]> sethsimmons: The second one works. The one at port 18081.
18:51:31 <shadowfax-87[m]> I have tryed to start monerod directly from the command line, same error couldnt connect to daemon 127.0.0.1:18081
18:56:43 <sethsimmons> Sounds like a jail or firewall issue, but that's odd as it's localhost. Can you share your systemd script?
18:58:14 * shadowfax-87[m] posted a file: monerod.service (1KiB) < https://libera.ems.host/_matrix/media/r0/download/matrix.org/MKSLveVsWRWbACdLauPvWhPu >
18:58:40 <shadowfax-87[m]> sethsimmons: file monerod.service attached above.
18:59:29 <sethsimmons> And your conf? Can also just copy-paste and use markdown to turn it into a codeblock with ``` before and after the code on newlines.
18:59:42 <sethsimmons> echo "Like this!"
18:59:52 <sethsimmons>  * ```bash... (full message at https://libera.ems.host/_matrix/media/r0/download/libera.chat/f55cc56027a28cbdc87676e5364c44eeac7e9499)
19:00:00 <sethsimmons>  * ```bash
19:00:01 <sethsimmons> echo "Like this!"
19:00:01 <sethsimmons> ```
19:00:26 * shadowfax-87[m] posted a file: (1KiB) < https://libera.ems.host/_matrix/media/r0/download/matrix.org/cKnxVsDubeWCMfUJpHLIvgCA/monerod.conf >
19:05:05 <sethsimmons> Remove `confirm-external-bind=1` and restart, see if that corrects the issue. You shouldn't need to have that line, I'll check my guide and see about updating it.
19:14:22 <shadowfax-87[m]> Didn't work, and another error message "Problem fetching info-- rpc_request" 
19:21:03 <shadowfax-87[m]> But again I have run the daemon from the command line without the pid-file and the detach argument the daemon have started but after a while it was killed.
19:24:00 <jaska087> have you tried --non-interactive ?
19:59:31 <shadowfax-87[m]> <jaska087> "have you tried --non-interactive..." <- Same issue. The daemon starts ok but it is killed after a while.
20:02:57 <shadowfax-87[m]> When I checked if the daemon is running with the systemctl status monerod the following warning shows up:
20:02:57 <shadowfax-87[m]> ConfigurationDirectory 'monero' already exists but the mode is different. (File system: 755 ConfigurationDirectoryMode: 710)
21:58:10 <crypto_grampy[m]> Seth For Privacy: i wonder if adding some kind of healthcheck to the p2pool container would be useful... i haven't dug into it much, but it's definitely a bit finicky and requires an occasional reboot
21:58:27 <crypto_grampy[m]> s/container/image/
21:58:41 <crypto_grampy[m]> probably has something to do with starting before/at the same time as monerod
22:01:04 <hyc> are they both in the same container? can't you put a sleep/delay in before starting p2pool?
22:01:21 <crypto_grampy[m]> yeah sleep would be fine as well
22:02:04 <hyc> if you want to be really clever you could write a shell script to query monero rpc in a loop and wait for the status to come back "synchronized"
22:02:18 <crypto_grampy[m]> i like that idea a lot
22:02:39 <DataHoarder> See my Docker-compose setup crypto_grampy[m] 
22:02:43 <DataHoarder> it already does that
22:03:38 <sech1> hyc https://github.com/SChernykh/p2pool/blob/master/src/p2pool.cpp#L699
22:06:44 <hyc> aha, cool
22:07:29 <sech1> as long as RPC port is up, p2pool will take care of it
22:07:37 <sech1> it only fails if it really starts before monerod
22:07:57 <sech1> *before RPC port is connectable
22:08:02 <hyc> in that case a short sleep after launching monerod should be sufficient
22:23:26 <sech1> hyc this change fixes startup when monerod is not available: https://github.com/SChernykh/p2pool/commit/966b499e5cc65adb722e66a28a3a2bc72b109ef8
22:23:39 <sech1> it shut down because of ZMQ, now it will keep trying
22:25:38 <hyc> hm, what's this m_finished.load() condition that breaks it out of the loop?
22:25:55 <sech1> it's when you run "exit" command
22:26:03 <hyc> cool
22:26:04 <sech1> m_finished is an atomic bool
22:26:18 <sech1> load() just reads its value
22:35:21 <crypto_grampy[m]> tfw my pipes freeze because p2pool didn't restart correctly
22:36:01 <crypto_grampy[m]> if !p2pool, run cinebench
22:39:19 <DataHoarder> crypto_grampy[m]: in my case input xmrig-proxy in front, in case no jobs come from p2pool it falls to another instance elsewhere 
22:39:26 <DataHoarder> if that fails too, it does pool
22:39:58 <crypto_grampy[m]> i like that
22:42:53 <moneromooo> Grmbl. Why has xmrig become so annoying ? It used to work with TF without any patch, now it needs lots of fixes to work because it assumes a lot more stuff -_-
22:45:56 <hyc> TF?
22:46:15 <nioc> townforge 
22:46:44 <hyc> ah right
22:52:40 <sethsimmons> <crypto_grampy[m]> "Seth For Privacy: i wonder if..." <- Yeah I need to do similar to DataHoarder, just haven't had time lately 😥
22:52:40 <sethsimmons> It does need a healthcheck, but sounds like the coming changes should remedy the common failure when starting p2pool and monerod at the same time.
22:53:04 <sethsimmons> Anyone is welcome to PR a health check 😅