00:22:26 <chad[m]> IIRC, sarang confirmed the break. It is not safe to use Arcturus (at least as originally described).
00:32:56 <sarang> ?
00:33:05 <sarang> Did I miss a related message about Arcturus?
00:34:08 <selsta> <corklander> So to the room: is the recent paper on Arcturus' Dual-Target Discrete Logarithm broken assumption correct? If Arcturus is DOA then it will affect my plans for starting a daemon language upgrade.
00:34:39 <selsta> If I get OPs in this room I can regularly voice everyone in case no one else wants to do it...
00:34:54 <sarang> The cryptographic assumption is indeed broken, making Arcturus unsafe to use in production
00:35:29 <sarang> The preprint has been withdrawn from the IACR archive, but previous versions are still available there (per the archive's policy)
00:37:29 <fluffypony> selsta: fixed
00:37:53 <fluffypony> I didn't see that message either btw, and I have ops
00:37:59 <fluffypony> so not sure if the bridge choked?
00:38:11 <selsta> I copied it from matrix
00:38:20 <fluffypony> yeah must have been a bridge issue
12:10:37 <utxobr[m]> pretty recent (Date of Publication: 09 June 2021) paper on an improvement to a previous proof of reserves on monero: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9449918  have you taken a look / contribute to it? sounds pretty interesting (I didn't finish the read yet, and the math is definitely above my capabilities)
12:17:04 <dEBRUYNE> utxobr[m]: As a side note, did you post your CCS proposal on Reddit for review?
12:49:09 <utxobr[m]> dEBRUYNE: not yet actually, good point on posting on reddit! I want to record a second demo (very likely this weekend) with some experiments I've got in a branch, I think once I publish then I can post it there 👍️ any recommendations? just a plain post pointing at it?
12:49:46 <dEBRUYNE> You can create a thread that includes both the demo and a link to your ccs proposal 
12:53:51 <coinstudent2048[> Hmm... MProve+ paper above looks interesting. I'll take a read (hopefully scihub works 😭 )
12:57:19 <coinstudent2048[>  * Hmm... MProve+ paper above looks interesting. I'll take a read (hopefully <del>scihub works</del> oh very new paper 😭)
13:52:35 <sarang> Oh interesting; I remember seeing the original MProve preprint, but not this updated version
14:07:47 <chad[m]> Does anyone have a non-paywalled link to the MProve+ paper? Idk why IEEE insists on paywalls
14:27:35 <gingeropolous[m]> chad: sometimes you can get around those by using noscript
14:33:40 <coinstudent2048[> I ...actually managed to get a copy thru vpn of my univ I graduated. Please wait...
15:11:41 * coinstudent2048[ posted a file: (564KiB) < https://libera.ems.host/_matrix/media/r0/download/matrix.org/njRNngGqiNKvSGdpTfPYRqGC/09449918%202.pdf >
16:01:01 <spackle[m]> I reached out to Arijit, and he provided the following link. I'll post it here in case anyone wants a more official source: https://arijitdutta67.github.io/homepage/paper/MProvePlus.pdf
16:49:53 <coinstudent2048[> Oops, I didn't thought of that. Deleted my copy.