14:09:16 <gingeropolous> i wonder if the image on slide 19 can be actually created. 
14:09:28 <gingeropolous> i know what they present is a cartoon to demonstrate fundamental differences
14:10:06 <gingeropolous> however, i would surmise that the actual curve for a decoy approach flattens out at some point.
14:10:55 <gingeropolous> i.e., the amount of "privacy", if that is a quantifiable term, is probably no different between 1024 decoys and 1024*n decoys
14:12:15 <gingeropolous> i wonder where i picked up the word surmise
14:17:50 <UkoeHB> The graph is a plot of tx size vs anonymity set size
14:17:54 <UkoeHB> not privacy
14:24:47 <gingeropolous> i sees a privacy arrow on the x axis
14:27:29 <UkoeHB> it's just saying privacy generally increases as anonymity set size increases
14:33:27 <gingeropolous> right. my point was, it might be interesting to actually try and analyze that. if "measuring privacy" is possible.
14:35:06 <gingeropolous> because, if so, we could possibly find a number for the maximum-benefit-gained-from-ringsize-increases number, and say with mathemagical confidence that there's no good reason to increase ringsize beyond n
14:38:30 <UkoeHB> I doubt anything less than 'all the outputs' can be considered good enough.