21:28:16 <r4v3r23[m]> is tx chaining TBD or DOA
21:29:45 <UkoeHB> ?
21:31:27 <r4v3r23[m]> i remember there was talk about tx chaining and gettng around the 10 block limit
21:31:37 <r4v3r23[m]> is that still on the table or was it deemed impossible
21:54:53 <UkoeHB> it is still on the table
22:33:24 <r4v3r23[m]> thx
22:51:28 <UkoeHB> r4v3r23[m]: do you have some use-case in mind?
22:57:56 <r4v3r23[m]> <UkoeHB> "r4v3r23: do you have some use-..." <- UX: abilitiy to spend unconfirmed outputs, especially removing the lock on unconfirmed change 
23:02:52 <UkoeHB> r4v3r23[m]: tx chaining doesn't really solve that, since you can't submit a chained tx until the earlier part of the chain is all in the ledger
23:04:26 <r4v3r23[m]> i was mainly referring to removing the 10-conf spend limit, i thought tx chaining somehow played a role 
23:05:53 <UkoeHB> no, it only lets you give a partial tx to someone else, which spends unconfirmed funds