17:11:11 "https://github.com/MAGICGrants/..." <- I dont know why I cant give you a 'tada' too :p 17:11:11 So, you say you can predict the real signer with 23% certainty (instead of 9% 1/11)? Is this number also valid for the 50 real txs? Nice job. 17:19:23 This right here is why Seraphis is important 17:20:12 > > <@ack-j:matrix.org> https://github.com/MAGICGrants/Monero-Fund/issues/15#issuecomment-1145354923... (full message at https://libera.ems.host/_matrix/media/r0/download/libera.chat/ce70e209f33ec33f38f99c8344ab6099e5e7559a) 17:31:30 jeffro256: dangerousfreedom The 23% accuracy was using a preliminary dataset of transaction collected in February. I was able to achieve up to 27% out of sample testing accuracy with a gradient boosted classifier two months back. This dataset is known to have flaws with its collection method and that is why I am collecting a new one as we speak, which should be done by July 1st. The dataset and training of the models however was 17:31:31 done with an undersampled subset of the dataset, eliminating the guess newest heuristic. This also has not been tested against the ~50 mainnet transactions yet, hopefully I will have that done by this or next week. Also I agree, even though these are preliminary results they show the importance of increasing the anonymity set, and a sublinear solution like Seraphis is perfect. If the v15 hardfork didnt get pushed back so far I 17:31:31 would have also collected an additional dataset with size 16 ring signatures to quantify the added privacy benefits. 17:43:24 Cool :)