19:48:43 <ooo123ooo1234567> UkoeHB: are there any news about audit progress ?
19:52:02 <ooo123ooo1234567> judging by lack of online activity inference.ag supervisor is really busy with something since 13th June
22:58:41 <r4v3r23[m]> sech1: i noticed this comment on reddit re: 10 block conf
22:59:13 <r4v3r23[m]> "There have been discussions on IRC, and there is a proposed solution: use transaction hashes instead of indices in rings for mempool transactions, because any reorg changes indices. But I didn't hear about any plans to implement it."
23:00:06 <r4v3r23[m]> has this been further explored and still a valid way to get rid of the limit?
23:11:44 <UkoeHB> r4v3r23[m]: it does not solve the problem of decoys getting reorged out maliciously, invalidating regular users' txs. It is also not forward compatible with large ring sizes, which need deterministic references for efficiency.
23:51:08 <ofrnxmr[m]1> UkoeHB: when you have a moment, any insight on the convoy in -dev?