10:05:41 <rbrunner> I propose to revisit the choice of the checksum algorithm for Jamtis addresses in the frame of the Seraphis wallet workgroup
10:06:01 <rbrunner> Issue describing this and with a chance to discuss and comment is here: https://github.com/seraphis-migration/wallet3/issues/37
10:07:44 <rbrunner> As I already wrote in the workgroup's Matrix channel: I don't want to encroach on MRL's turf with this, it's just that a consensus here would be very good
10:08:05 <rbrunner> Also paging Tevador
18:33:12 <Rucknium[m]> I've posted the currently disclosable portion of my submission to the OSPEAD review panel: https://github.com/Rucknium/OSPEAD/blob/main/OSPEAD-Fully-Specified-Estimation-Plan-PUBLIC.pdf
18:35:09 <Rucknium[m]> I tried to start with an introduction understandable to laypeople.
18:36:05 <Rucknium[m]> Section 8 "Inter-Temporal Stability of Spent Output Age Distribution for BTC,
18:36:05 <Rucknium[m]> BCH, LTC, and DOGE" is mostly unchanged from when I posted it here a few months ago.
18:37:54 <Rucknium[m]> Feedback welcome :)
18:42:43 <rbrunner> Hmmm, as I don't understand most of the math and stat stuff anyway, I think I will continue to patiently wait for the "How bad is it?" part finally revealed.
21:01:53 <DataHoarder> External user opinion on checksums/polynomials: usage of them as in bech32 (calculate it, check it, but do not produce or suggest corrections) is ok, with optionally suggesting “these characters can be incorrect” without offering the specific replacement character