18:33:11 Hey, there’s something I’m curious about. I’ve been examining the transactions since v15 fork, and there are a lot of exactly repeated values in the _absolute_ fee, not weight-adjusted. 18:33:11 Took a while to figure out what was going on: they are generated from the form `fee = intercept + k * increment` where all values are integers. Furthermore, there are numerous (intercept, increment) generators. 18:33:11 Below I’ll paste two plots, one with raw data, and one with transactions exhibiting this characteristic from the first two generators I discovered towards the high end of the data: (intercept: 6124000000, increment: 40000000) and (intercept: 31720000000, increment: 13580000000) 18:33:21 So far I’ve identified 6 generators: (6124000000, 40000000), (31720000000, 13580000000), (122560000, 80000), (158600000, 1800000), (226500000, 1800000), (709760000, 320000) 18:33:21 I can’t for the life of me figure out the meaning of these values or any higher order pattern in how the generators are sampled/created/whatever 18:33:21 Any ideas? Is this core wallet behavior? 18:33:21 The two generators in the below plot account for 14,084 transactions. When I count all 6 known generators, it’s 1,377,606 transactions (34%) since v15. 18:33:51 https://usercontent.irccloud-cdn.com/file/L6ZBy5Ku/image.png 18:33:58 https://usercontent.irccloud-cdn.com/file/7J1gAYrv/image.png 18:38:07 I'm brushing up on the current fee algo, maybe this is how wallet2 does it? 18:40:41 Ah here we go, this jives right? https://github.com/monero-project/monero/blob/44ac52f9298f359423d75167f9ffd278384ca91f/src/wallet/wallet2.cpp#L303-L308 18:41:00 🤔 18:41:49 No wait, hmm. I'm not sure 18:48:07 ArticMine @ArticMine:libera.chat: 19:27:20 Have been poking more at the data set, I think this is fine (normal wallet behavior)