01:59:25 <kayabanerve[m]> UkoeHB: 👍️
02:17:13 <kayabanerve[m]> rbrunner: I'd say Shamir's Secret Sharing, not multisig, if you want to be pedantic :p Just wrapped up my own reply. The problem statement they made is absolutely not worth the time for anyone to develop...
03:55:41 <jeffro256[m]> <rbrunner> "In case somebody who knows..." <- Perhaps another solution could be a 2/4 publicly verifiable secret sharing scheme where Alice holds 2/4 shares, the lawyer holds 1/4, and Bob holds 1/4. Then public auxiliary information about all shares is passed around initially and each party verifies each share https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Publicly_Verifiable_Secret_Sharing
03:58:17 <jeffro256[m]> 1) Bob and Lawyer would know that their shares are legit and 2) Alice would never have to interact with Lawyer nor Bob 
03:58:53 <jeffro256[m]> *never after the initial splitting