19:21:42 <m-relay> <c​haserene:matrix.org> I hear you. I'm (obviously) aware that the number of inputs is not a wallet-specific parameter, but a function of the enote set and the value of the transaction. I don't think the privacy gain of mandating at least 2 inputs can be easily fit into your framework, because it's not a non-standard wallet behavior. I guess if you approached it counterfactually, i.e. suppose that 2-in t<clipped message>
19:21:42 <m-relay> <c​haserene:matrix.org> xs are the standard, and 1-in txs are privacy defects, you could quantize it.
19:26:21 <m-relay> <c​haserene:matrix.org> *suppose that 2-or-more-in txs
19:27:10 <m-relay> <c​haserene:matrix.org> yes, that casts a doubt on the worthiness of requiring at least two inputs