00:38:32 I'm in support of scripting that doesn't meaningfully decrease privacy. scripting is probably needed for side-stepping issues with the 10-block lock and relatively slow finality, and it allows for a broad range of applications (imagine a programmable layer 2 that has its state changes validated by the monero blockchain and XMR can be bridged to/from it, but other than that, it doe 00:38:32 sn't affect the main chain). there may be ways to have our cake and eat it too, kayaba kicked off a discussion about this a month ago: https://github.com/monero-project/research-lab/issues/116 00:39:18 scripting is a bit of a meaningless term imo.. not a good one.. we already have a subset of scripting 00:39:33 and turing completeness is just some ideal 00:39:51 whereas there are real problems that augmentations to our current "scripting" needs 00:48:44 what is that subset? the only ones I know are certain scriptless scripts described by a handful of research papers. I haven't seen any of them implemented.