04:38:12 ArticMine: would you be able to join us at MoneroKon this year to give a talk about these suggestions? 04:38:54 Yes. I will be submitting in the next few hours 04:39:30 ,,,,and the talk will be on the above 04:40:15 Great! 07:45:11 Submission completed 11:17:46 would the long term sanity median also be dynamic? 11:19:55 yay for ring size increase, and the associated penalty-free zone increase. Increasing fees im a bit washy on, but because the algorithm is the way it is, any real usage will cause the fees to eventually drop as the median blocksize increases. 11:21:58 i wonder if the black marbles could be identified... somewhat... based on the time they were created. 11:23:26 so a massive spam attack would involve the attacker creating a lot of transactoins at the same time. as these sit in the txpool, the enotes they consume will age in relation to newer txs that are added. though this would also sweep up normal txs 11:24:26 and im not seeing how binning could make things better, even though i want it to 12:38:25 Yeah, if the Tail Emission changes I'm peacing out haha. 0.6 XMR (roughly) every 2 minutes forever <3 12:42:40 I think the Tail Emission is just fine. I think it is natural to have an Emission rate similar to Gold, especially since Monero is a competing "currency" (a highly marketable good). Having a low rate of dilution is a good thing. The reason security isn't higher is because demand for Monero is low relative to what it could be. If demand for Moneroj goes up so does security budget. 15:37:36 Of course. 15:41:05 It will be able to grow up to approximately 1.5x a year which is the historical rate of growth of Nielsen's Law 15:46:53 There is also a surge factor built in for the long term median.