18:19:40 I wrote a summary and statement piece on MAX_INPUTS (and a few related topics): https://gist.github.com/kayabaNerve/dbbadf1f2b0f4e04732fc5ac559745b7 18:22:47 ArticMine: ofrnxmr Lyza sech1 dave.jp midipoet blurt4949 Rucknium @ anyone else who participated in this discussion recently and cares 18:58:14 Thx for the summary. 19:29:08 kayabanerve: thanks for the info, i appreciate it. I'll have to try and read it a few times to grasp the intracacies. It seems MAX_IN=8 is high enough for the vast majority of users and use-cases. Not really sure i fully understand the MAX_OUT discussions to be honest. 19:38:26 midipoet: If MAX_OUTPUTS == 2 * MAX_INPUTS, I can send you one transaction's worth of outputs which takes you two transaction's worth of inputs to consolidate. 19:38:52 It's an asymmetry between cost incurred to trigger and cost incurred which could be considered a DoS. 19:39:43 I'm not saying it's the end of the world, it's just a poor design decision. 19:41:52 Oh, now i understand it better. thank you for that. 23:30:35 Are we limiting max input to 4/8 for Transaction uniformity ? 23:40:45 > Right now, ~220 inputs can be aggregated in a single transaction 23:41:16 kayabanerve @kayabanerve:matrix.org: this isn't accurate, as we actually limit to ~2/3 of 149kb (100kb) 23:41:36 Aprox 146 inputs 23:48:24 > 97.67% of transactions used less than or exactly 8 inputs. 97.71% of transactions used less than or exactly 8 outputs. 23:48:25 Rucknium: this goes back to 2019. I thought more recent number indicated ~30% of tx were 16 out