00:05:01 <m-relay> <k​ayabanerve:matrix.org> dave.jp: No, for technical limitations.
00:05:01 <m-relay> <k​ayabanerve:matrix.org> ofrnxmr: I thought it was 100 KB but I double checked the code and only immediately saw the 149400 number. If it's worse IRL, it's worse, and doesn't really change my comments. It means you only get 16 FCMPs if 1 proof per input though.
00:07:40 <m-relay> <d​ave.jp:matrix.org> kayabanerve: what are these technical limitations? In layman terms? Fcmp is not efficient enough? Has there been any discussion done with stakeholders like exchanges and merchants which would be the most affected by such a drastic change?
00:19:48 <m-relay> <k​ayabanerve:matrix.org> dave.jp: Read my post.
00:29:47 <m-relay> <d​ave.jp:matrix.org> Above my pay grade, from what I could understand it’s computational issue along with tx uniformity; i guess we will see how it performs on testnet and then finalise this max inputs?
00:30:01 <m-relay> <o​frnxmr:monero.social> Yeah, its actually a functional 100kb, 66% or 2/3 of 220inouts (146 inputs). I don't know why its limited to 66% though