04:19:01 I'll be clear I don't support anything within that issue. With my most recent note, with some academia, it would be incredibly feasible yet I don't support the complexity of introducing the change at this time. There are future paths for functional improvements noted, as I appreciate documentation, yet none of it is mapped up and I do consider the work being currently done at capa city. I do not wish to add to it. 04:19:42 *the private timelocks part would be incredibly feasible, sorry, I keep forgetting to distinguish that 04:54:03 Rucknium https://gist.github.com/kayabaNerve/6173fa623ac0f6a9cd4269c16f3ffd48 https://gist.github.com/kayabaNerve/175a00de6edd3a64458dacb4f5e481e0 04:55:18 Feel free to place those wherever necessary for the next MRL meeting 05:03:53 I also apologize for how disorganized/rushed the last one was. 17:17:59 We have to be careful with the assumption that the 210 billion set size is overkill. We cannot assume that the current regulatory shackles on Monero that have been in place since at least 2018 due to the lobbying by the BS companies will remain in place forever 17:24:28 Sure at 1 TPS it would take about 5900 years to reach 210 bullion transactions, but at the current VSA average transaction rate of 6500 TPS this limit would be reached in under 1 year. 17:31:36 All it could take is a reversal of one or more of the convicts in say Bitcoin Fog, Tornado Cash, etc ., demonstrating the fraud that BS really is for the shackles to be broken and the resulting demand on the Monero blockchain could be sudden and very large 17:35:17 In other words we have to be ready to handle the surge in transactions if the US DOJ for example gets beaten badly in court. 17:39:39 Yes I am aware that the set limit will adjust automatically when needed and also that the transaction weights will remain the same.