00:01:42 <m-relay> <c​haser:monero.social> sgp_: has this already been paid out to Veridise? https://donate.magicgrants.org/general/projects/veridise-gadgets-circuit
00:04:29 <m-relay> <o​frnxmr:monero.social> I believe so
00:53:08 <m-relay> <s​gp_:monero.social> Yes, they already completed that work
01:09:05 <m-relay> <c​haser:monero.social> interesting, I can't remember discussing that. have they shared the reports on that work?
01:12:33 <m-relay> <s​gp_:monero.social> Not that I'm aware of; they completed the report very recently
01:12:45 <m-relay> <s​gp_:monero.social> It will be shared of course
01:12:59 <m-relay> <s​gp_:monero.social> The findings were very positive
01:13:05 <m-relay> <s​gp_:monero.social> With some suggestions
03:03:27 <m-relay> <a​rticmine:monero.social> https://github.com/seraphis-migration/monero/issues/44
03:04:50 <m-relay> <a​rticmine:monero.social> I believe we have to take a very close look at how these verification time weights interact with the block weight scaling penalty
03:10:15 <m-relay> <a​rticmine:monero.social> I am proposing dispensing with verification time weight penalties and instead just apply the 4x fee thresholds above 8in 8 out / 10000 bytes. Essentially  a 4x higher minimum node relay fee
03:26:28 <m-relay> <a​rticmine:monero.social> would apply to greater than 8 inputs etc
12:43:01 <m-relay> <s​yntheticbird:monero.social> With the ongoing ongoing audit of divisor curves, i suppose we can't expect https://repo.getmonero.org/monero-project/ccs-proposals/-/merge_requests/518 to continue ? Or are there any updates?
12:43:29 <m-relay> <s​yntheticbird:monero.social> s/to continue/to finish its audit soon
15:17:35 <m-relay> <r​ucknium:monero.social> SyntheticBird: AFAIK, that CCS was not to audit any FCMP implementation. It was to audit code that interacts with the present-day mainnet.
15:27:19 <m-relay> <s​yntheticbird:monero.social> oh yes i know, thats not i meant
15:27:28 <m-relay> <s​yntheticbird:monero.social> oh yes i know, thats not what i meant
15:29:21 <m-relay> <s​yntheticbird:monero.social> it's just CypherStack is also taking care of the audit of monero-serai and monero-wallet, but since they are still continuing work on the Curve divisors, i'm wondering if this audit has been halted. I think normally this is not the case, but since both audits has been requested by the same Kayaba, and that there are no updates on monero-serai audit, i was wondering
15:41:54 <m-relay> <r​ucknium:monero.social> Probably different people are working on each one. But let's ask
15:43:08 <m-relay> <r​ucknium:monero.social> Diego Salazar: Anything to report on status of `monero-{serai,wallet}` code audit?