00:47:38 <m-relay> <o​frnxmr:xmr.mx> [@rucknium:monero.social](https://matrix.to/#/@rucknium:monero.social)  is it possible to store less records?
00:49:51 <m-relay> <o​frnxmr:xmr.mx> like, only the most recent one
00:51:33 <m-relay> <o​frnxmr:xmr.mx> The 525 checkpoint was invalidated by a reorg before it broadcast
01:05:07 <m-relay> <r​ucknium:monero.social> Yes. I can reduce it from 10 to 1.
01:11:15 <m-relay> <o​frnxmr:xmr.mx> Somehow spintered into 3 chains
01:13:55 <m-relay> <o​frnxmr:xmr.mx> https://testnetnode4.moneroconsensus.info/ stopped due to checkpoints (i'm mining to it now, to try to surpass the following)
01:13:57 <m-relay> <o​frnxmr:xmr.mx> https://testnetnode3.moneroconsensus.info/ shows 2 chains. One of them is the old/organic hashpower  split off from the checkpoints. One of of them is my attacking chain, now in the lead
01:13:59 <m-relay> <o​frnxmr:xmr.mx> then i locally have a checkpointed node at height 534, somehow
01:16:52 <m-relay> <o​frnxmr:xmr.mx> The 534 node has 18 peers
02:59:58 <m-relay> <g​ingeropolous:monero.social> selsta, based on the bill i got so far, its possibly to bring the cost down by a factor of 8 perhaps. But its spot instances, so its not a guaranteed thing.
03:10:40 <m-relay> <g​ingeropolous:monero.social> from the top four rigs on MRR, they can somehow offer between 40 and 50 MH/s for $171 / hour
03:17:31 <m-relay> <g​ingeropolous:monero.social> or $3.70 per megahash-hour