05:10:25 <br-m> <spirobel:kernal.eu> hash based approaches are considered the most promising. it is most likely going to be something in this field, or people just lose interest over the next decade. 
05:11:58 <br-m> <spirobel:kernal.eu> could also be a mixture, most of the mind share goes into those. maybe it matures enough where it genuinely offers value 
07:08:54 <br-m> <jeffro256> > <@yushanren:matrix.org> I did some readings about this topic. FCMP++ is not about PQC, but the proposed PQC algorithm CSIDH is in research. With Quantum computer, it can decrypt private key if public key is leaked. The public key is nowhere to find on chain. However you cannot count on FCMP++ to prevent quantum computers [... too long, see https://mrelay.p2pool.observer/e/n6PthpILNUxNY1JR ]
07:08:54 <br-m> <jeffro256> A QC cannot reveal amounts of RIngCT txs without the Monero address of recipients. Using only on-chain data, the amounts remain hidden. But for 1-in, 2-out txs, knowing one Monero address indirectly reveals the amounts in the transfers of people that they sent to 
07:20:01 <jojobi> Hey! I'm building a new programming platform and want to add a Monero to it
07:44:27 <br-m> <ofrnxmr:xmr.mx> #monero-community-dev:monero.social