05:58:14 <ErCiccione> binaryFate could you update the website when you have a chance?
13:43:35 <sgp_[m]> ErCiccione  this is super overreaching imp
13:43:37 <sgp_[m]> https://github.com/monero-project/monero-site/issues/1486#issuecomment-862989243
13:43:41 <sgp_[m]> * ErCiccione  this is super overreaching imo
14:53:36 <ErCiccione> Neither Sunita nor Monero Talk ran for Congress. <- this is a bit a stratch isn't it? My point is that would be better to avoid adding on getmonero the logo of a program run by a political candidate. If nobody else care i'll just add it.
15:23:43 <sgp_[m]> Did you get what I mean about the different logos?
15:23:52 <sgp_[m]> Who actually needs the small and medium ones
15:24:07 <sgp_[m]> And the one without the white background is worse in 99.99% of cases
15:27:32 <ErCiccione> don't know why they were added, but makes sense to give two different versions of the logo in the archive at least. It doesn't hurt us to ship different versions in the archive as well. But sure we can remove them from the page.
15:27:41 <ErCiccione> at least they were adding some color :P
17:29:36 <save_g[m]> Hello im wondering who made the roadmap for monero there are no sources and not very specific estimated times on when those are going to be "finished" https://www.getmonero.org/resources/roadmap/
17:29:36 <save_g[m]> does anyone know where to get more info about this?
17:49:17 <selsta> there is no estimated timeframe
17:49:28 <selsta> some of these things depend on research that is still "in research"
17:50:11 <save_g[m]> good to know thanks
17:50:33 <selsta> triptych blocker is currently multisig, that is being worked on
17:54:49 <sarang> Multisig for Triptych is trickier than you might expect
17:55:24 <sarang> Depends on how technical you want to get!
17:55:49 <save_g[m]> yeah I was just confused because the roadmad on the website is saying 2021 so I thought they already know it will be released in 2021
17:55:50 <sarang> Also worth noting that the Triptych code has not undergone external formal review
17:56:12 <sarang> And while the paper underwent peer review for publication, that's no guarantee of review quality
18:39:10 <save_g[m]> but does anyone know why the website says "2021" for Triptych but "Future" for atomic swaps even though they are on mainnet already
18:40:53 <selsta> It could be that 2021 was the initial estimate.
18:50:53 <ErCiccione> yeah i think so
18:51:04 <ErCiccione> we can change it to "Future"
18:51:20 <save_g[m]> and atomic swaps to finished?
18:51:49 <save_g[m]> or still too early to claim that?
18:52:28 <ErCiccione> i would say too early
19:55:58 <nioc> save_g[m]: the farcaster implementation for atomic swaps is currently being worked on and as I understand it will have more functionality than the commit version
19:56:41 <nioc> Sorry that I can't give you more detail for what that means :)
19:56:44 <selsta> The farcaster implementation is producing a quality software library that can easily be integrated in projects.