00:01:28 <selsta> yea, that definitely doesn't look correct
00:02:05 <selsta> some are .po and some are .pot
00:02:18 <selsta> but just `.` looks wrong
00:04:54 <QuickBASIC> Yeah it's broken my workflow because git can't sync it to NTFS and so git thinks they're deleted and I can't unstage the change because they don't exist.
01:36:12 <QuickBASIC> If I just reset hard on the commit before it I can actually use git again. Will that break anything later when I PR?
06:51:02 <ErCiccione> yeah i must have commit them by mistake. I'm gonna remove them
06:56:12 <ErCiccione> QuickBASIC: you can base your PR on https://github.com/monero-project/monero-site/pull/1859
07:46:47 <ErCiccione> <ErCiccione> "luigi1111 please merge 1835" <- actually hold on. We might need to edit a couple more things
08:05:17 <ErCiccione> ^ disregard. I misunderstood. Can be merged
15:13:00 <QuickBASIC> ErCiccione sorry to be a bother, but the reason all three moneropedia entries were submitted as a single commit was because I wanted to include links referencing each entry in the others. Maybe I'm daft, but how would I make three separate commits?
15:14:37 <QuickBASIC> Add one entry without links to other, commit, add entry without links to other, commit, add entry with links and edit other entries to add links, commit? Seems messy if I'm going to have to refactor the grammar during review.
15:16:03 <QuickBASIC> My git-fu is like toddler level.
15:19:57 <selsta> should be fine to keep it as one commit IMO
15:21:05 <QuickBASIC> Yeah selsta, Its fine either way, I'm just asking for clarification on his review comment.
16:06:53 <QuickBASIC> Reviewed 1859. This makes it really difficult for Windows contributors to base their work on the most updated version of the site. (See my comment for explanation of why this is https://github.com/monero-project/monero-site/pull/1859#pullrequestreview-769602221)  Is there any reason that this can't be merged relatively quickly?
16:19:53 <selsta> luigi1111: ^
16:34:20 <luigi1111> soon 
16:55:25 <QuickBASIC> ™