02:09:41 ccs wallet incident blog post up for review https://github.com/monero-project/monero-site/pull/2208 08:00:21 let's wait for an input from core 10:01:52 I think it makes sense to publish as is. We had already spent some time finding info and discussing that post. 13:17:57 plowsof are you around to fix those two minor issue in the pr? 13:18:19 after that's done we can merge and deploy straight away. This should be out as soon as possible 13:18:36 especially because media will be on this soon if they are not already 13:19:04 if plowsof is not around i would just merge and deploy. 13:33:38 hi 13:34:04 checking 13:39:12 plowsof. I see the edits, only needs to be squashed and then it's ready imo 13:39:21 should be ready for squashing now ErC 13:39:29 ok thanks! apologies, i was asleep 13:40:07 no worries no problem 13:40:48 squashed x 13:49:04 I'm having a moment where i'm not completely sure we should post that message as a blog post. It assumes people already know terminology like ccs and mentions fluffypony's arrest, which could be confusing and give a wrong impression. Maybe would be better to write a shorter blog post with an explanation in simpler words of what happened and clarify that this doesn't imply a proble 13:49:04 m in Monero itself? 13:49:52 it's just a thought i'm having right now and i would be fine to go with the post as it is. But this is a very sensitive matter and we should definitely be sure we are as clear as possible without possibility of misunderstanding and confusion 13:50:06 yeah I know, I thought the same 13:50:26 we would link to the github issue from the blog post, but i'm not sure about posting that entire text 13:50:30 maybe it's better to write something and say there was an incident, and here's the GitHub issue 13:50:33 that details it 13:50:48 yeah 13:51:21 somethin happened, everything is fine, we're actively working on a solution , heres the details kinda things? 13:56:55 yeah a clear simple communication from core that points to the github issue for details. 15:13:48 i've pushed the shorter version 15:14:28 i have added "The General Fund (which remains intact) will be used to cover this loss. Contributors with [in-progress](https://ccs.getmonero.org/work-in-progress/) CCS proposals will remain uneffected. " 15:14:55 this statement needs to be confirmed and or edited by core 15:17:36 preview http://127.0.0.1:4000/2023/11/03/ccs-wallet-incident.html 15:18:33 lol localhost https://deploy-preview-2208--barolo-time-757cf9.netlify.app/2023/11/03/ccs-wallet-incident 15:25:58 Fluffypony are you working on a statement from core? 15:26:47 If not we can come up with something like plowsof suggested (but in that case i would suggest some changes) 15:32:21 my only requirement is for the clarification on work in progress proposals being unaffected, very important 16:22:17 oh apologies - I've not been working on anything, other than just bouncing the idea around here 16:46:55 what about: 16:47:06 Today, during a routine transfer, we noticed the '[Community Crowdfunding System](https://ccs.getmonero.org/)' (CCS) main Wallet was drained of 2,675.73 XMR (the entire balance) on September 1, 2023. The hot wallet, used for payments to contributors, is untouched; its balance is ~244 XMR. We have thus far not been able to ascertain the source of the breach. An internal investigati 16:47:06 on is ongoing and further details will be released once we have them. 16:47:07 The General Fund (which remains intact) will be used to cover this loss. Contributors with [in-progress](https://ccs.getmonero.org/work-in-progress/) CCS proposals will remain unaffected. 16:47:07 Further details and discussion can be found on this [issue on GitHub](https://github.com/monero-project/meta/issues/916). 16:47:22 plowsof ^ added a couple of details and changed a couple of lines 16:49:12 thanks 16:50:44 it's just a suggestion tho 16:50:54 don't know what core thinks about it 16:50:57 fluffypony? 16:54:28 "today we noticed" would have been 28th september 16:55:08 otherwise seems perfect 16:55:25 ah ok let's drop it then 17:07:41 looks good to me, thanks for doing this! 17:15:47 final review ErC 17:17:25 i would leave the link to the css website plowsof. So people know what we are talkingabout 17:18:18 beside that i'd just squash and get it merged 17:48:22 yep (link was dropped during copying, will add) 17:51:51 looks good 18:14:58 binaryfate blog post ready to be merged and deployed: https://github.com/monero-project/monero-site/pull/2208