19:44:28 <plowsof> getting monero-gui verified* on flathub yes/no https://github.com/monero-project/monero-site/issues/2200
19:55:37 <m-relay> <1​23bob123:matrix.org> https://discourse.flathub.org/t/how-do-you-get-a-flathub-submission-verified/3714
19:55:38 <m-relay> <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Looks like realise on developer?
20:00:21 <m-relay> <p​lowsof:matrix.org> Dan 🤐  alderman (Is not the man & Braxman Tomsparks Advocate ): thanks for searching, the 'how' part has all been handled for us, now its just a matter of ' but verified makes people think they never have to confirm hashes! or it will convey some other message '
20:04:24 <m-relay> <1​23bob123:matrix.org> Gives the illusion of being “offical”
20:05:42 <m-relay> <1​23bob123:matrix.org> But if the key is on getmonero site, they have the option of removing it, if flathub repo goes cold
20:06:49 <m-relay> <p​lowsof:matrix.org> the maintenance ccs is coming up to a year https://ccs.getmonero.org/proposals/maintaining-flatpak-package.html
20:08:30 <m-relay> <p​lowsof:matrix.org> monero core repo on github will push to flathub infra. flathub infra can still be haxed (as any infra can) but the hashes on the github workflow run can be matched
20:13:18 <m-relay> <1​23bob123:matrix.org> So you dont what people to be complacent?
20:20:59 <plowsof> https://klausenbusk.github.io/flathub-stats/#ref=org.getmonero.Monero&interval=infinity&downloadType=installs%2Bupdates
21:13:33 <m-relay> <o​frnxmr:agoradesk.com> I think if flatpak politics are too much trouble, that at some point we look into replicatinf the featherwallet build
21:14:17 <m-relay> <o​frnxmr:agoradesk.com> Or streamlining the feather build, so other wallets such as gui, cake, stack.. monerod, gupax, whatever, can all use flatpaks without flathub
21:45:43 <m-relay> <1​23bob123:matrix.org> what about hosting own repo?