14:42:17 Hey team! My name is Mike, I'm marketer of Quickex - online cryptoexchange. We already provide one of the best rates on Trocador and OrangeFren and would like to be listed in Merchants category on your website. 14:45:52 Hi Mike, 14:45:53 everyone seems to be in vacation today for an unknown reason. The website is being revamped and is still in design phase atm. You're the first one to ask directly for a marketing collaboration. We can't guarantee you anything as we haven't formalized this topic yet. At my understanding there will be people against listing centralized exchanges in the website. But this is something 14:45:55 we can definitely discuss next meeting (I think in two weeks) 14:45:57 cc: Diego Salazar 14:50:00 We are not centralized exchange. Quickex is no kyc crypto exchange. So would be pleasure to discuss any questions you have regarding our service 14:51:43 From the community point of view, a centralized exchange is any exchange (fiat or crypto) that isn't decentralized in the p2p sense. I did understand you were a crypto exchange. i'm sorry if I confused you 14:54:02 Got you. Anyway, hope that our current listings, presence on Monerica.com and activity in telegram Monero community give some loyalty 14:55:23 Quickex has a pr on -site 14:55:30 quickex: i'm nahuhh 14:56:20 I suggest people _read the prs_ 14:56:41 Nobody is on vacation 14:56:43 plowsof hardened and myself work everyday 14:57:17 https://github.com/monero-project/monero-site/pull/2318 14:57:34 There haven't been any merges or deployments since you opened the pr 14:57:44 the sentence means there is low activity compared to other day bro. no need to take it to the word 14:58:46 yes sir, thats our account as well for devs. I can log in from it in order not to confuse you 14:59:54 No problem. I'm just letting you kniw that we havent forgotten about you. We just havent prioritized adding merchants until we have some community sentiment 15:00:08 I personally tried your exchange (via trocador) and all went well 15:00:24 same, went well 15:01:26 honestly super glad to hear that! Working hard on increasing trust and loyalty to our service 15:11:02 [Offtopic]: ofrnxmr I think your xmr.mx user need to get into #monero-support:monero.social . I don't have the power to invite you. 15:42:29 plowof-hardned? where is that fork? 15:43:36 Nsfw 15:44:10 damn nsfw is everywhere these days 15:44:23 poor plow-hrdn 15:47:09 we should add a criteria at the bottom of this page https://www.getmonero.org/community/merchants/ 15:49:11 so people can know if they are elligable to be added 15:49:21 exchanges* 15:50:06 agree, should be discussed next meeting 15:52:51 should also add a warning on https://www.getmonero.org/resources/tools/ for "Address Generators" 15:53:21 appreciate the warning from https://monerotech.info/ 15:53:23 >This is a server-based app: If you enter your own "hot" seeds or secret keys anywhere the server could, in principle, spy on you or even steal all your coins. Any new seeds and keys are calculated on the server as well, not locally in your browser. 15:54:28 We dont even list getmonero.org/generator 15:56:10 great 15:56:17 can download it as an offline file 15:56:31 >Based on code from MyMonero 15:56:35 lol 16:02:22 is https://moneroj.net/ accessible? 16:03:41 no 16:03:58 https://matrix.monero.social/_matrix/media/v1/download/matrix.org/FUwcvYvTMNjgrjsjbAsvJsTi 16:04:00 looks dead, should be removed from https://www.getmonero.org/resources/tools/ 16:04:38 Morpheus: 16:05:04 Theyve been under ddos with trocador 16:05:05 might not be dead 16:05:20 oh k :( 16:06:26 what about https://monerohash.com/nodes-distribution.html, working? 16:06:47 I'm using a VPN, check-host showing it works 16:07:11 blocks VPN/Tor? 16:09:51 website needs to get deployed as some revmovals are arleadt approved PRs from months ago 16:19:21 Hey guys 16:19:35 I think it's a njalla problem, I noticed earlier today as well 16:20:04 I tried to ssh into moneroj but failed 16:20:12 I'll try rebooting 16:20:34 tried https://incognet.io/? 16:21:11 Yeah I know incognet, I was just avoiding having to set up a new server haha 16:21:35 I'll debug today to see, but it might just be a njalla problem really 16:21:41 They are not very good 16:25:49 Crunchbits 16:55:29 Working again 18:44:27 Diego Salazar can we have a forum ? 18:44:52 forum.getmonero.org is beyond outdated 18:45:05 and no one wants to use lemmy 18:45:21 forum.monero.space 18:46:32 Just not yet. Impending v0.18.3.4 blog post by selsta. Best to wait till then, that way all merged PRs *and* point release blog post go live at the same time. 18:47:13 having some issue currently with macOS GUI which is delaying the release 18:47:39 thx you sar 18:48:53 Theres nothing stopping us from deploying twice aside from whether or not we want to ask bF to deploy twice 18:50:02 I just want a single website with links from all the part of the community. Because Reddit really f*cked us good by banning everyone 18:50:18 now r/monero is a zombie town 18:52:35 We can see up a discourse or flarum? 18:53:22 🔮 it will be dead 18:53:37 Isn't that what hungouts in gm do? 18:53:48 flarum works good with grapheneos 18:53:52 so i would say flarum 18:54:28 whats *hungouts in gm* 18:56:20 doesn't follow monero theme 18:56:26 librejo follows it 18:56:56 discourse 18:57:24 Discourse work great for everyone, better UI/UX plugins, themeing 18:57:56 privacyguides, techlore, all linux distros forums 18:57:57 BRUV. 18:57:59 most* 18:58:12 Do you know how to read? https://www.getmonero.org/community/hangouts/ 18:59:59 <3​21bob321:monero.social> Its where you hang people out to dry 19:00:11 acronyms 19:00:25 gm = good morning 19:00:38 <3​21bob321:monero.social> Sick of forums… 19:00:57 No lol. Gm get monero. Context. 19:01:00 r/monero bonk 19:01:06 like tob feather 19:01:26 Don't reinvent the wheel, sign up on forum.monero.space and build the network effect yourself. 19:02:26 who runs it? probably will last and functional better that gm guys 19:02:33 than* 19:03:23 xmrscott 19:03:55 lol 19:14:39 <3​21bob321:monero.social> Yeah…..nah 19:39:30 we had a forum back in the day, great for spam 19:40:13 oh we have a problem with macOS? how am I not surprised ? 19:41:12 <3​21bob321:monero.social> No surprise face? 20:34:02 nioCat: solved it already 20:34:49 some required tool I was using got decomissioned by Apple so I had to figure out how to use the replacement 20:35:01 someone please review for typos or other mistakes https://github.com/monero-project/monero-site/pull/2354/files 20:39:33 Just went through it quickly, initial glance looks all good. Marked as ready. 20:39:55 Didn't see any typoes or broken links. Useful if a couple others proofread too. 20:48:39 Lgtm 20:53:47 good to merge: 2342, 2321, 2333 20:53:49 confirm 2331 with bf 20:53:51 hardenedsteel: can you approve 2327 if all good 20:53:53 2326 should be good too 20:57:12 2335 20:57:49 2352 20:59:01 2347 20:59:47 do we care about saying contributors are largely unfunded when (apart from luigi) they all have open ccs' https://github.com/monero-project/monero-site/pull/2354/files#r1723971062 21:00:59 i mean either we keep it or we remove it for all 21:01:11 i don't want to adapt it for each release depending on who contributed 21:01:21 I just grabbed a sip of tea when i read that part 21:02:03 2342 (replace cake with monero.com), and 2318 (quickex) should be fine as well @plowsof 21:05:36 tf2 meme? 21:05:53 we can make it a seperate issue to create some universal statement if people have a problem with it (i dont have the stats to show that the majority of releases now have contributers that _are_ largely funded) 21:06:10 no reason to make the blog wait 21:07:22 will that blog force website deploy? 21:07:26 or just wait in the queue 21:07:33 Kermit 21:07:35 Yes 21:08:24 thanks selsta for saving us 21:09:30 unless of course everyone says this is perfect and it replaces the statement in every blog within the next 60 seconds "This release was made possible by the efforts of 8 contributors who dedicated their time and skills, whether funded through the Community Crowdfunding System (CCS) or through voluntary contributions" 21:10:09 why even mention CCS? 21:10:16 'you can be paid to contirbute??? BRB' 21:10:20 tsmt 21:10:33 Because it currently says "unpaid" 21:10:54 better to just remove the paid/u oaid altogether next time 21:10:59 Inclusivity 21:11:13 Volunteers are are appreciated as paid contributors 21:11:17 very progressive 😎 21:11:19 very progressive 😎 21:12:10 probably don't want to deter anyone contrivuting because they just want to fix some bug or improve something without applying at monero glassdoor 21:12:40 they could be funded through platform, so its a tricky one to have to mention the known/unknown platforms 21:12:59 Yeah. I'm all for removing the line altogether next time (even retroactively) 21:13:01 agree with this 21:14:05 `This release was the direct result of 8 people who worked, largely unpaid and altruistically, to put out 39 commits containing 535 new lines of code. We'd like to thank them very much for their time and effort. In no particular order they are:` to `This release was the direct result of 8 people who put out 39 commits containing 535 new lines of code. We'd like to thank them very 21:14:07 much for their time and effort. In no particular order they are:` 21:14:27 let's change it next time 21:14:37 already sent everything to bF 21:14:46 lol 21:14:59 Perfect 21:15:25 don't want to overwhelm the pigeon carrying message to bf 21:15:40 Pigeons is a different person 😝 21:16:28 yep for another time, not last minute thing. thanks selsta 21:18:46 why next time? 21:19:30 Because bf is about to merge and deploy 21:19:31 have to come to a consensus on what to do. i should have raised the issue sooner 21:19:46 pretend i didnt mention it 21:19:49 Its like Christmas 21:21:03 And next time is good consensus. Hopefully we'll have quicker merges and deployments now 21:42:56 im not interested in replacing cake with monero dot com 21:44:10 why not note both 21:44:26 just add monero.com aside cake wallet 21:44:43 that PR didnt go well 21:45:12 https://github.com/monero-project/monero-site/pull/2007 21:45:14 oh 21:46:19 in the thread i offer a dumb suggestion of keeping cake but changing the URL to monero dot com lol 21:47:35 ok 2007 ended up badly. can we retry this time ? 21:48:06 are we going to start going through the list of wallets and replacing them with a monero only (or close to) version? why? some users want less apps 21:48:15 stack wallet has a stack duo for example https://github.com/monero-project/monero-site/pull/2081 21:48:47 thats fair 21:51:20 (the list of wallets is small enough to actually go through them and do that lol) 21:53:35 im not interested in replacing cake with monero dot com << the idea here is that came is a multiwallet, monero.com is a monero wallet. We are still linking to cakewallet.com in the pr 21:54:14 in the thread i offer a dumb suggestion of keeping cake but changing the URL to monero dot com lol << lololol plowsof is the opposite 😆 21:55:04 oh i see 21:55:17 where am i 21:56:32 do they list monero dot com wallet here though https://cakewallet.com/ 21:56:50 yes 21:57:08 And cakewallet.com isnt behind cloudflare captcha 21:57:43 Cakewallet.com also has link to fdroid repo 21:58:18 stackwallet duo yes or no? 21:58:36 Duo isnt maintained to the lvl of stack 21:58:44 Duo is also still a muktiwallet 21:59:40 So idk if id bother recommending duo over stack. If stack made a monero-only version, yes. They have epiccash-only and firo-only wallets, duo is btc+xmr 21:59:56 so stack dont care about the almost monero only wallet in their line :-o 22:00:49 Yeah. Lol. Ppl complain a lot about duo not getting updates. I think its up to date now, but for a while it went without a release 22:01:18 poor rehrar 22:01:39 ok so an outsider could say we're working for cake and pumping both their business ventures (the original cake and their new* monero dot com wallet) 22:01:50 also someting to consider 22:02:20 nah, more that we consider cake a shitcoin wallet now 22:03:02 i use cake too... just not for xmr 22:03:48 multicoin wallets are less secure imo 22:03:52 I think the *we* in *we consider* is inaccurate 22:04:20 not just talking about myself 22:04:44 lot of people still respect and use cake wallet for xmr and other 22:04:49 A shitcoin wallet = the coins they support and the focus of the wallet 22:05:13 it is both a "punishment" and a "reward" to cake 22:05:22 depends on the wallet implementation, but generally yes there is more attack surface 22:05:36 nothing WRONG with it, but we asked for a monero-only wallet 22:05:50 I have cake, monero.com, stack wallet, mysu, anonero and xmruw installed 22:06:14 i dont use cake for xmr 22:07:36 i use cake for ccs and generalfund view keys* 22:07:39 i admit my cake wallet knowledge is probably a year + old 22:08:07 has something major happened ( added way more coins? sentiment changed?) 22:08:36 Nano, tron, solana, polygon, eth 22:09:54 If stack made a monero-only wallet (that was kept up to date), id want tk replace stack wallet with the monero-only version 22:10:07 there is no merge list so dont worry about getting things into the release deploy 22:10:28 firo, for example, doesnt recommend stack. They recommend campfire (or whatever its called) 22:10:37 interesting 22:11:20 edge wallet sips tea 22:11:20 https://github.com/firoorg/campfire/releases/tag/v2.0.1 22:11:29 >_> <_< 22:12:02 Edge wallet needs tk be removed 22:12:05 ok thanks this is all new info 22:12:11 ships trackers 22:12:52 https://github.com/cypherstack/stack_duo <<2 months since update on master 22:13:10 I want to ask the question here just in case someone knows but who tf manage automoderator on r/monero. This bot is still spreading proprietary spyware wallets 22:13:36 its been years now 22:13:47 we can raise the concern to debruyne 22:13:48 Its a conspiracy 22:14:35 https://github.com/cypherstack/epic-mobile 22:17:23 Tldr: stack wallet is better than stack duo due to support. 22:17:25 monero.com and cake share the same repo and are updated simultaneously. All else being equal, I'd personally prefer prioritize "pure" monero wallets over multiwallets