16:12:17 guyssssss 16:12:20 hey chat 16:12:42 Hi 16:12:44 so how could one setup an exchange like platform with deposits and withdraws in miner on 16:12:45 monero* 16:13:02 Wrong room, probably 16:13:10 because you can only send a few transactions at a time with monero 16:13:22 idk what room to ask 16:13:27 Monero 16:13:38 okay thank you 17:26:50 i would like to delist BTC ↔ fiat exchanges from the site 17:27:40 especially hodlhodl, they charge 1% fee + premiums for swapping 17:27:41 there are ones ?* 17:28:07 ah yeah 17:28:38 make sense to delist hodl hodl. fwiw I would keep Bisq as Bisq2 is planning on adding native XMR/BTC swap. Could also add Haveno since last version is officially supporting mainnet 17:34:02 current bisq 2 is so useless imo, they don't have any escrow, its just messaging app 17:34:14 that lets you post your offers 17:39:33 ah ok 17:39:41 well then replace the two by Haveno 17:39:49 well then replace the two by Haveno-reto 17:47:11 Hodl hodl should be replaces with haveno, not reto 17:47:28 And unstoppableswaps should be added to the list 17:49:22 bisq has xmr<>btc, same as unstoppableswaps. Shouldnt delist bisq for "only supporting btc<>xmr" considering unstoppable only supports btc<>xmr 17:51:01 If we list "reto" we awt precendent for listing every splinter network that pops up. We can list "haveno" and add a "networks" section and list reto in the networks section of haveno 17:51:27 I'm not even sure hodlhodl supports xmr _at all_ 17:52:05 they dont, just offer makers do 17:52:16 https://hodlhodl.com/offers/sell?filters%5Bcurrency_code%5D=XMR&pagination%5Boffset%5D=0 17:53:09 "Buying your BTC with MONERO ✅ 17:53:11 HODL HODL DECIDED TO REMOVE MONERO AS PAYMENT METHOD, BUT WE WILL STILL TRADE WITH IT. 17:53:13 " 17:53:20 https://hodlhodl.com/offers/JtvWWgUYKqWDrg3o 18:29:19 strange, so according to that, hodl hodl does not support monero but these rogue sellers are offering it anyway? 18:30:56 haveno-reto won't be on getmonero lol 18:31:43 https://haveno.exchange/ announced that it was ready for mainnet, so we can wait ~1 year now 18:32:11 any reason? 18:32:28 https://haveno.exchange/blog/ready-for-mainnet/ 18:32:32 !remind me 1 year 18:33:05 haveno exchange " We do not endorse any networks at this time.", no further comments required 18:42:02 haveno can go @ https://github.com/monero-project/monero-site/pull/2091 18:42:11 " strange, so according to that, hodl hodl does not support monero but these rogue sellers are offering it anyway? " sounds like it 18:43:07 I dont think haveno fits "build on monero" because its not really 18:43:10 png->avifs xD 18:43:19 Its build on bisq and uses multisig 18:44:03 Ans townforge too, thats more of a fork, like wownero 18:44:33 Its not using monero's blockchain or consensus mechanism (partially POS now) 18:44:40 justifications for such a page given here https://github.com/monero-project/monero-site/issues/1641 18:45:22 I think 18:45:23 s/hodlhodl/haveno + add unstoppableswaps 18:45:27 rude to say townforge is "slightly edited version of Monero," after al the work mooo put in 18:45:47 Erc's reasoning is flawed 18:46:35 primo > rpcpay = one of these is a service that uses rpc pay, one is rpc pay 18:47:19 Townforge is a genesis fork, with different rules and different consensus, haveno is an exchang that runs on its own network, based on bisq 18:48:25 there are 100 different projects that can be listed with this group, including haven, salvium, localmonero, btcpayserver, moneropay, kuno 18:49:03 Monero-lws, openmonero, mymonero 18:49:16 Monujo 18:50:16 basically anything that uses monero in any way 🙃 18:50:53 " rude to say townforge is "slightly edited version of Monero," after al the work mooo put in " << agreed. Its its own beast 18:51:19 well, haveno without monero would cease to exist as the trades depend on multisig+monero tech 18:51:31 wownero is a "slightly edited version of monero" 18:51:52 > *slightly* 18:52:01 Haveno is an exchange that uses monero functions for trading monero, same as localmonero 18:52:05 haven (a fork) without monero would cease to exist , but that is a fork and proposed conditions where "no forks" . btcpayserver does not use monero as such, its just a supported coin 18:52:18 Any wallet can be considered in the same breath 18:52:37 " haven (a fork) without monero would cease to exist , but that is a fork and proposed conditions where "no forks" . btcpayserver does not use monero as such, its just a supported coin " townforge is a fork 18:53:00 Btcpayserver and haveno both use monero-wallet-rpc to send and receive transactionsb 18:53:18 remove monero from btcpayserver and what do you have? 18:53:34 remove monero from bsx, same thing 18:53:39 Xmrbazaar, localmonero, haveno, rino (rip) all use monero multisig 18:54:18 They are just wallet interfaces that depend on certain functionality to send monero transactions. 18:55:04 multisig isnt some magic backend feature, its just a wallet transaction 18:56:25 Haveno uses haveno network to relay messages, not multisig. Multsig is just for escrow. Using multisig doesnt put you in some magic new category 19:00:01 any service that focuses on monero (like kuno) would fit the category, even though its just a UI that lets you interact with for monero features. rino js another good example of a product that supports monero (but isnt built on monero). 19:00:30 The best example of a "built on monero" work be townforge _if_ it used monero blockchain, or haveno _if_ it used monero for communications 19:02:55 Imo, primo might be the only valid option, since its a ddos system that utilizes the monero blockchain in a non-standard method. Forcing users to perform POW to prevent ddos, using monero's difficulty to pay for the ddos 19:03:33 maybe EquiX? 19:03:47 build on randomx hm 19:04:01 Its different than randomx iirc 19:04:29 we need to revive primo 19:04:43 we all know they wont endorse forever and why 19:04:57 Why? 19:05:28 I also dont know why it took them like 6 months to (re)announce mainnet 19:05:35 lol 19:06:16 Oh wait. They must have announced to remind ppl about kraken? 19:07:54 Haveno not speaking the name if any network is funny tbh. as id feds will think haveno disnt know about reto, while accepting patches from and providing guidance to them 19:08:11 As if* feds 19:08:42 "youre honor.. i've never heard of reto in my life" 19:11:16 I swear I wouldn't have built this tool if i knew "reto" would make use of it 19:12:31 unstable 19:12:58 they literally announced it 6months ago 19:13:00 and this is the only official announcement 19:13:34 No this is not the only official announcement 19:13:54 from haveno.exchange, yes 19:14:02 I asked woodser in his room 19:14:10 haveno.exchange website was dead 19:14:19 every github release includes a changelog about it can be used on mainnet 19:14:21 how 19:14:42 Running Haveno 19:14:43 ...Haveno can be used on Monero's main network by using a third party Haveno network. We do not officially endorse any networks at this time. Alternatively, you can start your own network. 19:15:30 Thanks hardened 19:15:45 Haveno software had many bugs that needed to be ironed out, before seriously recommending it 19:16:04 Haveno software had many bugs that needed to be ironed out before seriously recommending it 19:16:29 https://github.com/haveno-dex/haveno/releases/tag/1.0.5 19:17:23 Went to from beta to v1.0.0 7 months ago 19:18:19 Dont play word games. It was officially released and announced as released 6+ months ago. 19:18:19 it was recommended against usage when it was v0.xx 19:18:55 As of v1.0.5 it was literally _instructed_ as to how to run your own network. 19:20:12 Being _told_ to run a network is the opposite of a "YMMV" non-recommendation 19:21:42 this is what woodser said, not me 19:23:05 woodser also released haveno 7 months ago 19:24:23 Nobody ever recommended _against_ using haveno. Except for the banmonero.com guy 19:29:59 I was answering your question 19:30:03 . 19:30:13 I was simply answering your question