18:23:30 <apotheon> Does anyone here know enough about Zano to tell me how its privacy capabilities compare with Monero's?
18:40:14 <selsta> apotheon: afaik they work on something similar to Seraphis / Triptych / ...
18:43:49 <apotheon> I don't know much about Seraphis and Triptych.
18:45:01 <selsta>  it will allow for higher ring sizes without increasing transaction size significantly
18:45:04 <selsta> thus better privacy
19:07:41 <apotheon> selsta: gotcha, thanks
19:22:01 <rbrunner> They have a feature that looks interesting: "auditable wallets": https://medium.com/zano-news/zano-auditable-wallets-what-are-they-and-how-do-they-work-dcdb173e824d
19:22:26 <rbrunner> However, many people would probably see this as a solid anti-feature :)
19:23:01 <rbrunner> I think the new address schemes of Seraphis will allow something quite similar, with view-only wallets that also see outgoing transactions
19:24:37 <merope> Seraphis is compatibile with stealth addresses, right? So even if someone has my viewkey, they don't know where I'm sending 
19:28:37 <rbrunner> I think that really depends which particular address / key scheme will get implemented. Some schemes will allow for 2 levels of view keys, one that does not see outgoing txs, one that does
19:28:47 <rbrunner> not
19:29:35 <rbrunner> no, not not :)
19:50:45 <merope> I mean seeing the wallet address of the recipient on-chain (with the view key)
19:51:26 <merope> That's still not gonna be possible, right? Because we'll still have the one-time stealth addresses
20:09:29 <rbrunner> Yes, the receiver of your outgoing transaction stays safe.
20:24:10 <merope> Nice